Preview

Summary: Contrasting Caligula, Nero, And Vespasian

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1565 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: Contrasting Caligula, Nero, And Vespasian
Andrew Jyegal
Dr. Thomas Lawrence
HIST 405Y: Suetonius Paper
September 28, 2014 Contrasting Caligula, Nero, & Vespasian Suetonius is well known for his major historical work entitled The Twelve Caesars in which he analyzes the lives of twelve Roman emperors starting with Julius Caesar and ending with Domitian. The Twelve Caesars is considered to be an accurate and reliable primary source; however, it is a little bit biased in the sense that Suetonius is not always impartial in his assessments of the Roman emperors. It seems that Suetonius gives very good treatment to those emperors that he likes and very harsh treatment to those emperors that he dislikes, which says quite a lot about his integrity as a historian. For example, as is mentioned
…show more content…
Nero is the epitome of a bad emperor, whereas Vespasian is a great example of a good emperor. It seems obvious that Suetonius really likes Vespasian and dislikes Nero. Suetonius probably really likes Vespasian and rates him highly because he is the founder of a dynasty. Suetonius writes Vespasian 's biography in a magnificent way, does not mention bad things he did or his bad qualities (except him killing that one stoic critic and his bad quality of avarice), while he writes the biography of Nero in a very negative way. What is funny, however, is that Suetonius, forgot to mention one significantly good thing Nero did during his reign. Suetonius should have mentioned the fact that Nero tried his best to put out the great fire and to save as many people as he could and discuss his relief efforts after the fire. He did not. In the negative aspects of his reign section, he does not talk about Nero 's great persecution of Christians, which is a significantly bad aspect of his reign. He should talk about Nero crucifying and burning Christians alive at the stake in his garden. He should mention the fact that Nero ordered Christians to be thrown to dogs and lions. He should mention the fact that Nero used Christians as human torches. Why did he leave that part …show more content…
They are polar opposites. But, Nero was not always a bad emperor. In fact, in his early reign, Nero was a good ruler and he did many positive things. He intended to be a virtuous ruler. He never missed an opportunity of being generous or merciful or of showing what a good companion he was (Nero, 10). He lowered heavy taxes, gave 400 sesterces to the people, raised the annual salaries of distinguished, yet impoverished senators to 500,000 sesterces in some cases, and he gave free monthly issue of grain to praetorian cohorts (Nero,10). To gain popularity with the people, he provided them with a lot of entertainment-youth games, chariot races in the circus, stage plays (Nero, 11). He even frequently participated in singing and acting contests held in public theaters, which senators strongly disapproved of since singing and acting were considered to be disgraceful professions for people of low status in Roman society. It is interesting that he even staged a naval warfare on an artificial lake of sea water which had sea monsters swimming in it (Nero, 12). Also, during his reign, he suppressed a great number of public abuses through the imposition of heavy penalties (Nero, 16). Nero did do some good things in his early reign, but he is principally known as an icon of evil tyrant who committed countless terrible, wicked acts. He raped the Vestal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During the first few years of Nero’s reign, Agrippina held much influence over her son and political affairs. Because Nero was 17 at the time he became Emperor, and not yet old enough to rule,…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Titus Flavius Vespasian was well known for restoring peace and stability to an empire in disarray following the death of Nero in A.D. 68. In the process he established the Flavian dynasty as the legitimate successor to the imperial throne.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman emperor Caligula was one of the crulest rulers around. He would enjoy torturing people.He became emperor by smothering the last emperor (Tiberius) and the empire fell into his hands. He ruled for 5 years before being murdered. Before he bécame a amperes he was a politician.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    was born December 15th, 37AD and died June 9th, 68AD. Commonly identified as Nero, he ruled…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is noted that Julius Caesar killed Pompey in order to gain power over him, overthrowing his position and therefore achieving total authority over Rome in his place. It is here, that Julius Caesar is proven to appear to be somewhat ambitious. This ambition would lead way to persuade many of his senators to doubt his sincerity and question his true intentions for Rome. Meanwhile, as the plebeians spoke highly of him and adored him so, few started to catch onto his uncertain and rather concerning…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caligula’s brief reign as princeps stripped away the illusion of the Augustan restoration of the republic and exposed the truth of the principate being nothing less than autocratic rule. His reign saw some significant historical changes in the imperial system. He ensured that upon his immediate accession his reign would not model that of his predecessor, a step that secured his popularity. His dutiful display of recovering his mother and brother’s ashes not only served out the purpose of securing the populace’s favour, but also his right to rule. However, Caligula’s behaviour spiralled out of control months later, contributing to the deterioration of his relationship with the senate and the Praetorian Guard, his embarkation of expansionism and change in provincial administration and causing some financial strain resulting from his lavish expenditure.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustus’ dynasty included the unpopular Tiberius (14-37 A.D.), the bloodthirsty and unstable Caligula (37-41) and Claudius (41-54), who was best remembered for his army’s conquest of Britain. The line ended with Nero (54-68), whose excesses drained the Roman treasury and led to his downfall and eventual suicide. Four emperors took the throne in the tumultuous year after Nero’s death; the fourth, Vespasian (69-79), and his successors, Titus and Domitian, were known as the Flavians; they attempted to temper the excesses of the Roman court, restore Senate authority and promote public welfare. Titus (79-81) earned his people’s devotion with his handling of recovery efforts after the infamous eruption of Vesuvius, which destroyed the towns of Herculaneum and Pompeii.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Plutarch on the other hand is the principal source for the events surrounding Anthony, Cleopatra and Octavian, without his written history about Cleopatra, we in our modern world would know very little about her. The Egyptians’ were very bad at recording their history which is in complete contrast to the romans who hired scribes to write everything about them and their history?…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The myths were passed down for generations and even to this day many people believe that he started the Great Fire of Rome. Based on historical facts, during this time period, there was not any fiddles. Also myths were spread about on how he tried to deny he started the fire and blame it on Christians, which he actually blamed it on the Egyptian cult, Isis. People started these rumors on Nero because of all the murders he ordered on people. Although Nero did order someone to murder his mother, wife, and step-brother, the fire in Rome could not be started by him. It is reasonable to believe Nero started the fire because he went through with numerous murders, but he could not have started a fire if he was not present during it. Also it is believed Nero paid people to start the fire, but if he did then why would he make efforts to shelter those who survived the…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before doing so we must analyse the reliability of our main primary sources; Tacitus, Julius Caesar and Cassius Dio. All three sources were well educated but each have individual disadvantages. Tacitus was writing about his father-in-law which means there is probably a bias towards him in an attempt to impress him. Caesar was writing about himself which suggests that he would have made his achievements seem greater. Cassius Dio wrote about the events of the Roman invasion 200 years after they occurred. This means he is only as reliable as his sources.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He tells his audience that Justinian is a ruthless leader, “who was far too ready to listen to false accusations and quick to inflict punishment”. Through Procopius’ biased opinion of Justinian, we see not the great Emperor, but an almost demonic character, one that comes from peasant parents of barbarian descent. However, Procopius describes Justinian as “extremely simple with no more sense than a donkey, ready to follow anyone who pulls its rein, waving its ears all the time”. Definitely not the kind of character you would expect to find as an elite of the Byzantine Empire, let alone it’s Emperor. He continues on to tell his audience that if you added up all the calamities which had happened to the Romans for all time, and you weighed them against those with which Justinian was responsible, you would find that “a greater slaughter of human beings was brought about by this one man than took place in all the preceding centuries”. Procopius wanted his audience to know that Justinian was a corrupt tyrant. He committed many horrible evil deeds against humankind, from sweeping away established customs, looting households of wealthy people, to the murder of “thousands of thousands of…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While initially seen as a fair ruler this can be most contributed to the level heads and knowledge given from those who primarily advised the young ruler, and as his advisers left him to his own resources we can see the slow decline and shift in Emperor Nero’s priorities and desires. His perceived lack of caring for the support of the Roman people that eventually promulgated his down fall and resulted in his death. In other words best intentions are often laid barren and to waste when focus is…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Graves. R (trans) (1979 [1957]) Gaius Tranquillius: The Twelve Casers, revised with an intro. By M. Grant, Harmondsworth, Penguin, pp. 218-20, 222-7, 246-7) (primary source 2.5 Suetonius, Nero’s entertainments)…

    • 2364 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Emperor Nero was a sick human being who seriously lacked humility. He thought of himself as a god and would perform inhumane deeds such as stealing from sacred temples or killing innocent Christian people. Nero roughly killed about one hundred thousand Christians for no good reason whatsoever. He would use them to light up his parties or he would throw them into the gladiator pit, facing them against ferocious animals or deadly ruthless warriors. Nero's serious lack of humility caused him to perform poorly as a leader. If Nero had shown more humility throughout his time as leader, he would most likely have been not only a better person, but also a better leader. A good leader needs to display virtue in order to lead his people to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All good things come to an end. Rome was a seamlessly powerful empire, but just like any powerful civilization, it was bound to come to a halt eventually. After centuries of peace and prosperity and being the center of the world at the time, the empire was doomed to fall. It took many years of bloody wars, government reforms, and economic power to reach its peak; therefore, it would take many more years of wars and deterioration of the economy to a dwindling civilization. This phenomenal empire declined for many factors such as religious, political, health, and technological factors. Most of the factors came from within the city, which led to internal decay. Many foolish decisions and revisions caused the heart and soul of Rome to crumble.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics