Preview

Summary Of 12 Angry Men Act 1 Scene 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
938 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of 12 Angry Men Act 1 Scene 1
Summary The opening scene begins with a man sprinting out of a bar, followed shortly after by a half-dressed woman. The man is then scene calling 911 and reporting a rape, while the woman hails down a random truck and gets in. In the next scene we learn of the main character Sarah Tobias (Jodie Foster) as she reports to the medical staff at the hospital that she has been raped. They conduct an evidence collection, and shortly after Tobias is introduced to Kathryn Murphy (Kelly McGillis) who is her District Attorney. Also introduced is Detective Dunkin (Terry Mulligan), and both he and Murphy inform Tobias that they need to return to the bar in order to identify the attackers.
Once inside Tobias identifies her three attackers, whom are taken into custody. In the next scene Murphy is scene driving Tobias home, during which, the two get to know each other. Tobias retreats to her home for the night where she is met by her emotionally dead boyfriend whom seems to be of no
…show more content…
New witnesses are found and enough evidence is gathered to take three new men (all bystanders who encouraged the rape) to trial. In the beginning of the trial, Tobias gives her statement reliving the horrible night in great detail. Murphy questions her and a strong statement is made to the jury of what these men are capable of. The defense tries to question her, but makes little progress in doing so. A new dilemma is reached when the man who made the 911 call deliberates on whether he wants to testify or not. One the attackers turns out to be his friend, making it difficult for him to do the right thing. In the end he testifies to what truly happened that night, the film shows it in a gruesome flashback of the gang rape that took place that night. The jury finds the three new men all guilty, this also adds an additional five-year sentence to the the original threes nine-month

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Juror 3 is a strong, forceful man who refuses to alter his vote. Being very opinionated, he looks at the evidence “you sat right there in court and heard the same things, I did” (14) and doesn’t think beyond the facts. Still haunted by his own son, he verbally assaults the other jurors with mighty tone that knowing that a kid like his son is going to be locked up. Juror 3 and his son had some troubles with their relationship in the past. Juror 3 comes right out and says that he was going to make a man out of his son or bust him trying. Which in the end his son slaps his father across the face finally beating him back for the first time and fled town; since that day they haven’t spoken or seen each other. Since juror 3 feels that his son was not the way he was supposed to turn out, his feelings of his son were building up inside of him and were faced towards the case of the convicted.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the movie twelve angry man, after the twelve jurors listened to the facts in the trail, the judge gives her instructions to them. The judge told them that the man could face the death penalty if he found guilty. The 12 man gather in a stifling hot room to have a concluding about the case. They start arguing and adding their own experience, culture, and understanding of people's motives as a way of reconsidering the facts. Although all the jurors had listened to the same stated facts and they were in the same situation, each one of them interprets the facts differently. This reflects the differences in people and the different ways that we view the same things.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also accustomed to forcing his wishes and views upon others (1). Therefore, during the developing of the voting, Juror Three try to force people to admit his prejudice continuously. If people do not agree his view and vote for not guilty, he is angry and interrupt other Jurors’ discussion. Even though other jurors support appropriate assumption and evidence to prove the murder is not guilty, Juror Three do not believe and keep his prejudice which has logical fallacies. For example, when Juror Nine change his vote in the second voting for not guilty, and want to explain the reason why he change his mind, Juror Three answers, “No, we wouldn’t like to know why”(12). When Juror Eight try to measure how long the old man can walk in 15 minutes, and walk as slowly as the old man who uses canes. However, Juror Three says, “You made it sound like a long walk. It’s not,” (19) and when Juror Eleven thinks Juror Eight’s behavior can be an important point. Juror Three declares, “It’s a ridiculous waste of time”…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men, is about a jury’s decision making process in a murder trial. The facts in this play become blinded by the prejudices that some Juror’s possess. A prejudice jury became formed due to a biased testimony and the facts became clouded as generalisations were formed by the Juror’s. Some Juror’s bigotry can be based on their past experiences and discrimination didn’t only happen to the defendant, but it was also experienced by Juror’s themselves…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tower Documentary

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The film starts with a journalist reporting from the scene while driving toward the campus. “This is a warning to the citizens of Austin. Stay away from the University area. There is a sniper on the University Tower firing at will”. After which the film shifts to tell the stories of the first victims of the shooting. Claire Wilson, about 8 months pregnant, and her boyfriend, Tom Eckman are leaving the Student Union after getting coffee and as they are…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose, did not choose the setting by accident. The surrounding setting in the novel had a lot of purpose, intention, and dedication to it. Setting in any novel plays an extremely important role in defining characters, plot, and themes. Every piece of setting in Twelve Angry Men plays an integral role. In Twelve Angry Men, the weather and the jury room play a defining role in the setting.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial takes place on the ‘hottest day of the year’. This inevitable heat sets the stage for the aggression that arises in the most of the men hence the title ‘12 Angry Men’. Aggression can be described as any form of behavior that is intended to injure someone physically or psychologically. This suggest that aggression like any other behavior is provoked by many internal as well as external factors. Heat produces an uncomfortable arousal that may facilitate aggression. This is further defined in the revised frustration- aggression hypothesis (Dobbs et.al., 1939), which states that factors like heat contribute to the building up of negative feelings that produce aggression. Aggression can also be explained in terms of internal factors. The biological factors that contribute…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men, a teenaged boy is indicted of committing premeditated murder, the most serious felony tried in the United States justice system. While initially it appears the boy is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, after careful deliberation from the jury, additional evidence surfaces, showing the boy may not be guilty. Additional evidence found led the jurors to impeach the witness’s accounts, due to inconstancies in their testimonies. For these reasons and others I believe the boy was not guilty. For example, one of the most convincing pieces of evidence from the prosecution is an eyewitness account from a woman who saw the boy murder his father from the windows of a passing el train. However, the jurors discover the women’s…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People can change based on the personalities contained in a group. For example, if the personalities in a group are positive and supportive, then each person’s self-esteem is boosted up and he or she will speak his or her mind. However, if the personalities in a group are aggressive or assertive, then each person might be less willing to speak his or her mind and go along with the group. Not only that, but a typical person wouldn’t stand up for something alone. He/she would instead go with the majority of people. In a group of 100 people, each person with his/her opinion, at least 30 % of those 100 would stand up against everyone else.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Influence

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juror Three’s past negatively influences him to vote guilty despite all the evidence pointing to an acquittal. In Act One, Juror Three talks about his bitterness towards “tough kids”. He goes on and on…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Analysis

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In analyzing 12 Angry Men the first theory that came to mind is the Universal Theory of Leadership. The theory is defined as the belief that certain personal characteristics and skills contribute to leadership effectiveness in many situations. This shows true with Juror #8. Juror #8 was the architect who emerged as a real effective leader. The architect showed self-confidence and assertiveness. He convinced the jury that once all thought the young man was guilty to believing he was innocent due to the lack of proof and questionable assumptions. He showed himself as respectable, knowledgeable, and authentic. The architect rose question as to whether or not the circumstances could be possible by re-enacting the situation. He challenged the process completely by doing this. He was also a leader of integrity because he was loyal to rational principles, practiced what he preached, and did this regardless of the social pressure from fellow jurors’. With these characteristic traits the architect proves to be an charismatic and effective leader.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Response

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The setting of 12 Angry Men is a jury deliberation room where the jurors are and required to decide the guilt or innocence of an 18 year old that is accused of committing first-degree murder by stabbing his father with a switchblade knife. Witnesses were presented to give evidence of hearing a quarrel; hearing a threat to kill, and have seeing the boy run away. Another witness swore to having seen the boy stabbing his father from a window across from where the murder occurred. Eleven jurors were convinced the boy was guilty and deserved the death penalty. One raised questions he felt had not been asked or had not been pursued by the defense.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve angry men is a 1957 American Film that originated from a play of Reginald Rose and has been directed to a film by Sidney Lumet. The movie is not just about the outcome of the trial of a Puerto Rican youth who has been accused of murdering his father, but also shows how the beliefs and attitudes of the twelve jurors lead to his acquittal. Aside from that, this movie also shows Leadership traits that can help every individual on developing their leadership capabilities. The story started when the twelve jurors were put together in a sweltering deliberation room somewhere in America where they have been asked for their verdicts whether to put the child on chair or not. Eleven of them unanimously voted that the youth is guilty and must be…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays