Preview

Summary Of Athlete's New Day By Paul Marx

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
210 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Athlete's New Day By Paul Marx
Should college athletes be paid to play for their schools? In his article, “Athlete’s New Day,” Paul Marx argues that they should be, and that they will be soon due to the failing policies of the National Collegiate Athletics Association. Issues such as lawsuits over the sales of names and images of players and failure to compensate for long-term injuries sustained by players are beginning to wear down on the NCAA. With a protest movement growing, and attention turning to how professional the amateur college sports are, Marx sees changes coming right around the next bend.

Marx sees the development of a pay to play system as a chain reaction starting at a student level with on campus protests. College Presidents will begin to side with their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The ideals of amateurism and the capitalist benefits that the NCAA reels in annually do not mix and are in fact hypocritical. Television deals and sponsorships are only growing. The three weeks of the NCAA Basketball Tournament, known as “March Madness,” generate over $770 million in TV rights deals alone as reported by USA Today. College football moves to a playoff system for the 2014 season. ESPN is in the process of securing the playoff TV rights, and many expect the network will eventually have to pay somewhere in the neighborhood of 500 million for them. So while the NCAA is signing multiyear, multimillion dollar deals it’s only giving out 1 year renewable scholarships to their athletes playing in these highly profitable games.” The rules have been set up in such way to avoid a public understanding that athletes are already paid. It’s just a matter of whether they are paid their value” said Staurowsky, who in 1998 co-authored the book” College athletes for hire: The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA’s Amateur Myth” with Allen L.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “The athlete as agent of change,” by Lonnie Bunch and David Skorton, many athletes are using the national anthem to influence people. Many people dislike this however, I am fine with it. I see it as them trying to get across a point about a problem in the world, such as racism. Maybe they just think of the American flag do to all the problems in the world. For example it states,“He, too, saw the flag in a different light due to the racism he faced every day. As he wrote in his 1972 autobiography, "I cannot stand and sing the anthem. I cannot salute the flag; I know that I am a black man in a white world." As you can tell from the evidence provided the reason Jackie saw the flag in a different way was because of the color of…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The biggest question circulating in college sports right now is the controversial topic that ask, “Should college athletes be paid?” In August, a federal judge decided that players in top college football and men’s basketball programs- the big-money sports- are entitled to receive payment if their “names, images, and likenesses” are used in video games or TV broadcasts, according to Veronica Majerol, author of the article “Should College Athletes Be Paid”. It is a subject that has been around for a long period of time, and is now receiving light on the matter. The problem with this is where would the funds come from? Also, paying athletes would take away the fact that they play for the love of the…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The opinion piece, “The Athlete as Agent of Change,” by Lonnie Bunch and David Skorton discusses how athletes use their platform to address injustice. “Sport has always been a way used to challenge convention.”(Bunch and Skorton, paragraph 3). Athletes have the power and ability to change an idea or convince people of their ideas. The position they are in allows them to use their fame to promote their beliefs and causes they support. I believe that athletes should use their fame to promote a political agenda. One reason why athletes should use their fame to promote a political agenda is because athletes’ platforms allow them to easily persuade or sway the fans and audience to the idea they support. “Sport is a powerful way to do so because…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article, titled “Should college athletes be paid?” was written by Allen Sack and published on March 7, 2008 in the Christian Science Monitor. Allen Sack is a professor at University of New Haven. He attended college at University of Notre Dame, where he was on the 1966 National Championship football team. He has a published book, many journal articles and has given multiple presentations on the management of sport industries. Allen Sack’s main points when he wrote this article was either give college athletes all the benefits of pro athletes, or place them on an amateur status. His article focuses on how the organization, NCAA, has changed throughout the years as a…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On average, annually D1 Colleges are earning 50 million dollars across all sports in the schools. All of the D1 schools are making a great deal of money off these stellar athletes and they are receiving very minimal in return. On the other hand, if D1 colleges decide to pay their athletes how could this affect the other programs in the school? This is where the discourse begins on whether we should pay the college athletes, or is a scholarship more than content for the student. As a result of this dispute it can cause humongous outrages from angry parents and fans of certain teams.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pay for Play

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Ever since the National Collegiate Athletic Association was formed in 1905, their role in regulating intercollegiate athletics has involved many different tasks. These tasks include making athletics safe in order to prevent injury, marketing athletic events, regulating and changing rules in order to make college sports more fun for the fans, and enforcing the key principle of college sports: amateurism. Amateurism in college athletics means that athletes are unpaid. As a result, the NCAA has had to deal with deciding how to handle issuing and assigning monetary value of scholarships and grants. However, the NCAA has not had to manage the debate over college athletes getting paid to play. In a day where more and more college athletes are leaving college early to enter the professional leagues it is time to ask a question: Should division-I college athletes get paid? The question is based on the assumption that there is a place for college athletics within a university. The NCAA should be looked at economically because the universities within it generate profits through their athletic departments and operate as businesses by assessing costs, revenues, etc. With that assumption established, because of the market inefficiency and exploitative characteristics of the NCAA, division-I college athletes should get paid in a free-market environment. Division-I college athletes recognize that they are exploited and receiving a scholarship worth less than their market value, so they have no incentive to not cheat and accept illegal payments.…

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cronk’s article offers his professional perspective on the unjust treatment and regulations by the NCAA and why they must compensate student-athletes for their work and image. Cronk’s article quotes many NCAA guidelines and principles in order to provide the audience with reasons why the NCAA can’t pay student-athletes. The main focus of Cronk’s article…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “7 Common Sense Reasons Why College Athletes Should Be Paid,” the author, Maurice Peebles conducts an interview with Jay Bilas to get his input on whether college athletes should be paid. He shares how the NCAA is a multi-billon dollar business that limits athletes in particular on earning money. Also, he gives examples of different perspectives that people can relate to in different industries of how this situation would apply to them. Furthermore, he explains that college athletes would benefit more from being paid and it would require them to get a better education by not allowing them to leave college early to go onto the professional stage. The school’s are benefitting much more than the players are because the players are the reason why all of this money is coming in, the schools are just being represented and then paid. The scholarships given do not equal to what some college athletes are worth, because some out there could easily…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The notion of paying college athletes has been an ongoing and controversial debate for student-athletes, coaches, schools, media and most certainly the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Many would argue that playing major college sports is more like a job versus an extracurricular activity. As with the majority of many student athletes, some attend college with the aspiration of becoming professional players thereby college is seen as a means to end. Although student-athletes already receive compensation via full and partial scholarships to participate at the college level, passionate conversations will continue to be a topic of debate because of the enormous revenue generated by college sports.…

    • 3400 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million,” (Mitchell & Edelman). The money collected by the NCAA, goes towards the sports and the programs, not the players themselves, however, the NCAA says that “Student-athletes are at the heart of the NCAA’s mission,” (NCAA). “Some athletes and their supporters believe that college athletes deserve some type of financial payment for their services and contributions to their institutions, an opinion that has lead to player-initiated lawsuits, court cases, and strikes,” (Garcia).…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In recent years, colleges throughout the nation have come across plenty of controversy concerning the idea of whether or not athletes should be paid to play sports in college. To this day the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) deems this a violation of their rules, and that is no matter what the amateur status of the players who make college athletics a billion-dollar business is not going to change (“Associated Press”, 2013). Even though the issue is constantly being debated and to some the answer remains "up in the air" still to this day (Dabad, n.d.), I think the answer is quite simple on why college athletes shouldn’t be paid.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas universities like Texas State are recognized through their sport rankings and their star athletes’ performance on the field. The role athletes play in the production of profit from merchandise, ticket sales, and advertising has created the question: Should athletes get paid? Based out of “Student athletes deserve payment in multimillion-dollar industry”, published in the University Star, as the main text describes the reasons why athletes should be paid. The editorial staff argues about the profit the NCAA makes, how athletic scholarships work, and how some athletes come from low income families with the hopes of building better lives for themselves and their families. Readers can use “Student athletes deserve a piece of the pie, too”…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Are college athlete’s players or employees? The idea of paying a college athlete appears to be outrageous to some. The thought of giving someone money for something they have chosen to do may not appear to be fair. The greatest concern is where to draw the line. Should the decision be based on the amount of money and fame the program generates? Why should athletes be treated special and receive compensation for their contribution to the school? One major factor is that athletes make numerous sacrifices beyond that of a nonathletic student. Many athletes can’t seek employment to help offset the expenses of college because they are on the field or court for the majority of their day. Their time and effort is devoted to that of the school, thus potentially sacrificing their education. In many cases, athletes don’t receive funding for college, which means that not only are they paying financially, but physically to compete. The school takes in money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, just to name a few. If the athletes are fortunate enough to receive a scholarship, usually that is the only benefit. This in turn leads to taking out loans and having to look for other scholarships or sources of compensation, but this doesn’t stop them from being involved in the teams’ activities. The real question is why shouldn’t an athlete in college be paid to play? College athletes are the real moneymakers for the school, and they should be paid to play.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Playing a college sport is like a full time job, except the lack of financial benefits. College football and men’s basketball generate revenue of more than $6 billion every year, yet no money goes toward paying the people that make the sports possible (Bagaria). College sports would be non-existent without the devoted athletes who work hard and spend countless hours each and every day. Whether practicing, training, or playing in games, these athletes are involved in their sport all seven days of the week. College athletes put in almost the same amount of work as professional players do, but instead of making millions, rather they are receiving no financial benefits (Bagaria). College athletes deserve to be paid because they sacrifice so much for their team and deserve compensation. Secondly, college athletes not only deserve money because of their devotion, they also need it for their everyday life. During their athletic season, they do not receive any sort of payment for their efforts which would aide them financially and in everyday life (Bagaria). Most scholarships cover cost of housing and textbooks, but leave out basics such as food. Logically athletes need food, but their time and energy is spent on a “job” as an athlete…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays