Should D1 College Athletes Get Paid?
Should D1 College Athletes Get Paid?
INTRODUCTION
On average, annually D1 Colleges are earning 50 million dollars across all sports in the schools. All of the D1 schools are making a great deal of money off these stellar athletes and they are receiving very minimal in return. On the other hand, if D1 colleges decide to pay their athletes how could this affect the other programs in the school? This is where the discourse begins on whether we should pay the college athletes, or is a scholarship more than content for the student. As a result of this dispute it can cause humongous outrages from angry parents and fans of certain teams.
PROS
We already give these kids free school, but is that really enough? They devote all of their time to a sport of choice and it would be impractical to fit in a job to help pay for food, gas, clothing, etc. These stellar athletes are depending on their parents as a source of income because they do not …show more content…
Honestly, the the pros outweigh the cons on whether or not we should pay these college athletes, they spend all their time at the college and make money for them, they deserved to be payed something, time that could be spent with friends and family, and they’re instead spending their time in the gym or on the field. The amount of income would be based on the sport, gender, skill level, and school income. A list would be made by a committee of people to rank players from the top to bottom. They would rank the top players at that school and take a percentage of the school income from that sport. That way small D1 schools aren’t forced to go bankrupt. At a major D1 college the most they could get would be $10,000. This money would not be for them becoming rich. This money would go towards paying everyday things that we would buy. Almost like a bonus at a work company. Then the rest would get a small percentage of the total income. This is why I think we should pay college
INTRODUCTION
On average, annually D1 Colleges are earning 50 million dollars across all sports in the schools. All of the D1 schools are making a great deal of money off these stellar athletes and they are receiving very minimal in return. On the other hand, if D1 colleges decide to pay their athletes how could this affect the other programs in the school? This is where the discourse begins on whether we should pay the college athletes, or is a scholarship more than content for the student. As a result of this dispute it can cause humongous outrages from angry parents and fans of certain teams.
PROS
We already give these kids free school, but is that really enough? They devote all of their time to a sport of choice and it would be impractical to fit in a job to help pay for food, gas, clothing, etc. These stellar athletes are depending on their parents as a source of income because they do not …show more content…
Honestly, the the pros outweigh the cons on whether or not we should pay these college athletes, they spend all their time at the college and make money for them, they deserved to be payed something, time that could be spent with friends and family, and they’re instead spending their time in the gym or on the field. The amount of income would be based on the sport, gender, skill level, and school income. A list would be made by a committee of people to rank players from the top to bottom. They would rank the top players at that school and take a percentage of the school income from that sport. That way small D1 schools aren’t forced to go bankrupt. At a major D1 college the most they could get would be $10,000. This money would not be for them becoming rich. This money would go towards paying everyday things that we would buy. Almost like a bonus at a work company. Then the rest would get a small percentage of the total income. This is why I think we should pay college