Preview

Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
870 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes
Paying College Athletes: A Distraction from Academics
Why should kids be paid for doing a professionals job? The debate on whether or not to pay college athletes is a debate that has been argued for quite some time. Due to the lack of positive results, and a surplus of negatives, this should not take place. There is no way to muster up a fair system to pay the athletes while keeping everyone happy. Also, paying players will distract them from their academics due to them knowing that they can make money playing sports. Lastly, the athletes already have an opportunity for money with scholarships. Therefore, in order to keep college athletes happy and focused on school while still giving them an opportunity to receive scholarships, the students should not be paid for their athletic performances.
The fact that there is no fair way to determine how much money each athlete should receive is the main damper on this topic. Due to some sports being more popular than others, and certain positions demanding more skill, there is no fair way to pay the players. College
…show more content…
There is no reason to provide them steady paying salaries when the students are already paying less for school due to a scholarship. Also, if you do decide to eliminate athletic scholarships, can you keep academic ones? Academic scholarships are extremely important because they reward you for excelling in what school is all about, education. Academic scholarships don’t just impact athletes. Many students who don’t play sports will lose the opportunity to receive scholarships and that is simply unjust. Scholarships result in families having to pay less or nothing for their child to attend college. This relieves stress and paperwork for parents. As a result, universities should simply stick to scholarships; they keep school about academics and relieve the stress of managing extra paperwork and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If colleges were to pay athletes there would be no fair way to distribute the money. Athletes perform their sport at different levels of ability and for various lengths of time. In addition, not every player is able to compete in a game. Problems would arise about the athlete not playing which would not allow for him/her to receive the money they deserve. The first issue about this problem is that some people believe that athletes should be paid based on an open market system. This idea of an open market system would allow for supply and demand to come into play. In addition, a school would be able to pay their scouted athlete based on the money that comes in because of their ability. However, The payment would vary depending on the market along with the deals that each athlete has with the school. The second issue is about the colleges because not every college can afford the players they want to recruit. In 2013 the NCAA had an investigation on the economic stability of Division 1 sport programs. This study showed that out of 288 Division 1 schools only 23 were running their programs in a profitable way. This means that only those 23 schools had the money to pay a college athlete. In our society, any business not profiting from anything is likely not hiring, and there is no idea…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finally, the argument that college athletes are a large source of revenue for their colleges and their programs, but do not receive any compensation in return. According to Maxwell Strachan, senior editor focused on entertainment and sports for the Huffington Post, stated, “NCAA pulled in $989 million in its 2014 fiscal year, according to an audited financial statement cited by USA Today” (Stratchen). The NCAA informed the media that ninety-two percent of their revenue came from championships sponsors, ticket sales, and merchandise. These college athletes are the bases to all of those successes, but still never receive any of this revenue. When traveling for big tournaments the NCAA, pays for their rooms, food, and transportation, this is just…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Honestly, the the pros outweigh the cons on whether or not we should pay these college athletes, they spend all their time at the college and make money for them, they deserved to be payed something, time that could be spent with friends and family, and they’re instead spending their time in the gym or on the field. The amount of income would be based on the sport, gender, skill level, and school income. A list would be made by a committee of people to rank players from the top to bottom. They would rank the top players at that school and take a percentage of the school income from that sport. That way small D1 schools aren’t forced to go bankrupt. At a major D1 college the most they could get would be $10,000. This money would not be for them becoming rich. This money would go towards paying everyday things that we would buy. Almost like a bonus at a work company. Then the rest would get a small percentage of the total income. This is why I think we should pay college…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether college athletes should get paid to play college sports is still to be determined. Some people say that college athletes should get paid because everybody else such as the coaches, the NCAA, and the college are all getting paid. Also some people say they shouldn’t get paid because the students didn’t go to college to get paid they went to get a degree. The pros of paying college athletes is college athletes would be able to provide for their family, and they would be able to pay for hospital cost just in case of a serious injury. The cons of paying college athletes is some students that play sports for their colleges will think that they…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    58% of people agree that college students should get paid for playing sports, what do you think? College Football Athletes should get paid for playing football for there college. The athletes are ones who are playing the sports. Paying the college athletes will teach them economic responsibility. The college is making money for the college athletes playing football. Some colleges will not be able to pay the same amount ot some students. Should college athletes get paid for playing football?…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How will colleges distribute salaries? College athletes attract revenue for colleges throughout the process of tournaments, while not receiving a single penny. Students should focus more on school and less on sports, “student” comes before “athlete” and a college becomes a learning environment. They should not acquire a salary -- due to the fact that they have received a scholarship decreasing the expenses or are even left with no debts, have the chance to sign a contract with a professional team as scouters are constantly looking at the NCAA and are a school to earn an education that will set them up for life when sports can’t due to an injury. Schools main priority is to teach, the definition of university is “an educational institution…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College sports is a huge Multi-Million dollar business. Being such means Millions of dollars are spent every year updating stadiums, training facilities and other areas, all for the “amateur” athletes. But what makes someone an amuture and a pro? Is it money? It’s definitely not training because the argument is there that College players train just as much or harder than the Pros. So I will assume it is the the money that makes a difference. Money is overflowing in areas like Football, and Basketball and although the athletes benefit in one way, said athletes still deserve to be paid for what they do.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever heard of a business that made billions of dollars, yet did not pay their employees? Seems pretty remarkable doesn’t it? Well this business is known as the NCAA. According to an article in the New York Times, the NCAA made $770 million from just the three-week Men’s Basketball Tournament, but how much did the athletes who participated in said tournament receive? If you said zero then you would be correct. The athletes that poured their blood, sweat and tears into practice everyday and into the 30 plus game regular season did not see a dime. It is hard to fathom how an industry of this size can make so much money, yet not allow the athletes that help them make that money see any dividends.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The number one reason why college athletes should be paid is because they deserve it. College student athletes are working hard anywhere between 30 to 40 hours a week to be successful and excellent. On average every college athletic season ranks in between ten and 150 million dollars in revenue and zero dollars are rewarded to the athletes. Recently there was about an 11 billion dollar deal made between the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the television station, CBS. The deal revolved around a popular event in men’s college basketball, March Madness. The deal was that from 2011 to 2024, CBS would be the station to air the three weekend long event, and again, zero dollars go to the athletes making the event possible. March Madness doesn’t exist without the athletes and they receive none of the billions of dollars the event makes. Andrew Luck was a starting quarterback for Stanford University and a Heisman Trophy candidate. Fans came to the Stanford football games just to see him play. People purchased the jersey emblazoned with his name and number from the Stanford gift shop and he made absolutely no profit from this. Everything went to Nike and the University itself. Andrew Luck is just one example among the many college student…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It’s Time for College Athletes to Get Paid”, an article written by AJ Enno, examines college athletics are a key source of income, and they attract students to their colleges. The article states, universities depend on their athletes to produce and maintain the popularity of their school's name. He acknowledges college athletes are supposed to be the best of the best on that level, so this is why they should get paid. Enno also states, college athletes make enough money for universities that it would not hurt to give some back. So while the coaches get paid more than the President of the United States does, players sit back and have to be content with the sweat off their back as payment. He identifies, without the players coaches would not get paid as much as they do, and nobody goes to see a college game to see the coach in action, they go to see the players. Enno discusses, these athletes are practicing one half of the day and going to school the second half; there is no extra time for them to hold a job. It’s sad that people play video games with these players’ in the games, but they can’t collect any type of paycheck from game publishers; but the NCAA does. “It’s Time for College Athletes to Get Paid”, concludes that college sports will always be a big money maker for big time universities and colleges and they should take better care of their athletes by paying them for their…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should student athletes get paid? This question has long been debated for quite some time in various institutions and organizations. With the upcoming focus on the NCAA, especially in our own division of the Big East, the question on how players should be compensated is brought up. It is no secret that student athletes are compensated in various ways, whether it is through scholarships or complimentary housing, but questions of paying the student athletes a surplus in addition to tuition costs has been raised. This idea seems appealing to private universities with generous funding because it allows them to attract the top players to their school. I believe that student athletes should not be paid any additional money than that which covers their tuition costs.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another counter argument is that paying these student-athletes would take away the title “college athlete” and makes them into a “professional athlete”. Although this does pose a great argument, the fact of the matter is that these student-athletes are not getting what they deserve as they devote the same amount of time a full-time worker applies to their job. In order to call them a “professional” is if they were making a full salary, these students do not need a full salary, they just need a little extra to help them get buy and to insure safety if they lose their scholarship. Ryan Riddle, former professional American Arena football defensive end who was drafted by the Oakland Raiders, discusses the difference between college and professional…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Student athletes should be compensated for their work, as they are the sole reason for the Athletic Program’s surplus in revenue. These athletes are working for the schools and are doing a service to the college that seems to go unnoticed. Colleges are using these athletes to boost their respective reputations and bring in revenue while not compensating these athletes for their work. Everywhere else athletes are paid, so why shouldn’t college students too? Some critics may argue that these student-athletes are amateurs, and if paid then are becoming professional athletes. The minor league for baseball could be considered an amateur sport, although they do receive pay according to the team’s revenue.…

    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paying College Athletes

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Paying college athletes has been a controversy for over a century, dating back to what is considered to be the first intercollegiate competition. Fact is college athletes want to get paid beyond a scholarship. Yes, scholarships pay for the student’s tuition, books, classes, living expenses, etc., but they have no money to buy clothes, pay for parking, food, etc. Expecting the players to get paid millions of dollars is obviously unrealistic, but paying them as if it was a full time job, at least minimum wage is adequate enough. For the 15 highest paid coaches in Division 1, together they bring in around $100,000,000 every year.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Others might say that college athletes shouldn’t be paid because scholarships cover everything for school. Although, the scholarships often forget to cover everything. They cover most, but often do not fully cover meal plans, which can leave even a full-scholarship athlete in a mountain of debt. They might also say that not paying college athletes is the proper thing to do because it isn’t like they are on a professional sports team. I would say otherwise. College sport are not technically considered ‘professional’, but they should be. Awesome players, working together on an awesome team, against other awesome players, working together on another awesome team. Combine that with the fact that their sports are on TV, and it sounds professional to me, and probably to a lot of other people…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays