In the book, Acting Out Culture: Readings for Critical Inquiry by James S. Miller includes several different pieces of writing from a variety of authors. The two pieces of readings “Preparing Minds for Markets”, and “Blue-Collar Brilliance” in both that show the way different cultural stereotypes can influence how our society defines intelligence. “Blue-Collar Brilliance” by Mark Rose, focuses on the view that intelligence cannot be measured by the amount of schooling a person has completed. In the essay “Preparing Minds for Markets” by Jonathan Kozol, writes about a school’s unpleasing curriculum in the classroom. Back then education was the key to success, but today it is different.…
In “Hidden Intellectualism” Gerald Graff explains his view on intellectualism and how the education system only limits intellectualism to book smarts. Graff also enlightens the misunderstanding on society with “street smarts.” He explains that everyone including “street smart have potential and they are overlooked.…
White-collar jobs are on the rise in today’s world. They are not as dirty or as labor intensive as blue-collar jobs. It is not that white-collar jobs are not needed; it is just that blue-collar jobs make the world work like it should. The author wrote “The zombie apocalypse is a white-collar nightmare: a world with no need for the skills we have developed. Lawyers, journalists, investment bankers—they are liabilities, not leaders, in the zombie-infested world. (The exception to this rule, of course, is doctors.)” (Bosch). While white-collar workers claim to make a more decent living, their lack of skills is immense when compared to your local auto mechanic.…
People are divided, if it is by age, races, gender, crude stereotypes, wealth, social status, or intelligence. Every person is put in a category that labels them. If she or he has a white-collar occupation within an office or something as such, she or he is labeled as hardworking, intuitive, and smart. Adults working in cafes, construction, or other blue-collar jobs are classified as thick, lazy, and unintelligent. In “Blue-Collar Brilliance” by Mike Rose, he retells how his mother and his uncle worked in a blue-collar job, or working class job, but does not just see them as mindless for their lack of formal education. His article was originally published in 2009 in the American Scholar. Rose addresses the misconceptions of what is intelligence using his personal stories as an example. Mike Rose’s “Blue-Collar Brilliance” conveys his opinions of working class Americas efficiently through emotional appeals, logical reasoning, and explaining his own definition of intelligence.…
In the essay “Blue-Collar Brilliance” written by Mike Rose, he begins to talk about how Blue-Collar workers are smarter than what society put them out to be. Rose talks about his mother and how she has to member a lot of martial during the work period. Rose also talks about his uncle that started as a regular worker and worked his way up to supervising the paint-and-body line. This is where Rose came to see that Blue-Collar workers are smart they aren’t just given the credit. I agree with rose I Think that Blue-Collar workers are just as smart as the other classes of workers it’s about applying yourself.…
Mike Rose used this anecdote in order to lead us directly to nowadays world where we all judge each other based on what we do for a living. And here more precisely about how Blue-Collar workers are unfairly considered to be less smart people practicing non intellectual and non creative jobs.…
Rosie and Uncle Joe, are both somewhat an image of the true core of blue-collar work. Mike says it himself “To acknowledge a broader range of intellectual capacity is to take seriously the concept of cognitive variability, to appreciate in all the Rosies and Joes…”(Pg254) If it wasn’t for the true brilliance shown in the many blue-collar professions or the ideas from that of a blue-collar professional, would we be where we are today? Because much of society would agree, that today is a cleaner, safer, much more efficient world than that of even 20 years ago, largely due to the contributions and actions of the blue-collar workforce. Lastly, if we continue to “reinforce social separations”(Pg254), do our actions make us more mentally competent than the thought we have of blue-collar professionals’? Or are we simply doing as Mike Rose said we would, and “reinforcing social separations”? That is the true question…
Most people, when asked, say that a person is intelligent if they have “book smarts.” People that are book smart can write and converse about subjects taught in school. On the other hand, people with “street smarts” aren’t seen as intellectuals because the subjects they are knowledgeable about are not traditional. In his essay called “Hidden Intellectualism,” Gerald Graff insists that schools and colleges are missing an opportunity to translate street smarts into academic work.…
In America, a person’s social class plays a huge part in the type of education they will receive. This, in turn, determines how well they will succeed in their adult lives. A study done in 1999 found that on average there was a direct correlation showing the higher the family’s income, the better the student did on their SATs (710). This paper will examine the different educational experiences each social class undergoes. It will also look more in depth into the lives of three individuals who represent each of the social classes, and examine their educational background up to their present day careers and assets.…
In “Blue Collar Brilliance”, the author, Mike Rose, expressed multiple reasons why a blue-collar worker is intelligent and capable to participate in a Democratic society (Web). He challenged the bias of today’s world that lower-class jobs that do not require a degree mean the workers are not smart. He started out sharing the experiences of his mother and uncle who worked blue-collar jobs and showed various skills that took time and intelligence to develop. He continues his essay sharing his findings of other similar jobs he studied. He expressed different kind of skills from physical dexterity and tool-use competency to rhetorical skills and financial managing that these workers take time and effort to develop. I agree with him since my father,…
Our achievement ideology is based on the idea that the U.S. is full of opportunity and anyone can accomplish success in our society if they work hard enough. Many grow up thinking education is the ladder that will allow for this social mobility and all you have to do is be willing to work hard enough to earn it. But what about children who grow up thinking differently? Why do some strive for high paying careers while others refuse school and are seemingly ok with staying working class? MacLeod challenges the notion that America is the land of opportunity with research he conducted while in college. He uses the research of several reproduction theorists to show that schools not only are not great equalizers, as most think, but actually reinforce social inequality.…
The workers must refine their stance and fine-motor skills when using tools. They also need to know what each tool will do in specific situations. “Blue Collar Brilliance” explains how workers must have good judgement and problem-solving abilities with these tools, and how these qualities are considered forms of intelligence in the Western Hemisphere. Carpenters, for example, need to cut wood perfectly with a saw. If they fail to do so, their work will be ruined.…
A college girl tells Friedan “If your husband is going to be an organization man, you can’t be too educated. The wife is awfully important for the husband’s career. You can’t be too interested in art, or something like that.” (Friedan, 177). This college student is emphasizing that women should not further their education and not be smarter than men. She also feels that women are alienated since most careers require higher education and the real careers are reserved and already taken by men. Moreover, she expresses that women should not get in a man’s way of success because society believes men are supposed to be more intelligent in everything besides being a housewife that is why she should not pursue a career that requires high education. This could break the abnormal image of women challenging men in their careers. However, if women want real careers and rise greater than a housewife, risk is…
USA TODAY. (2002). Amount of schooling affects earning potential. Retrieved July 31, 2011, from http://www.usatoday.com…
Menand’s first theory explains that college is a sorting-out mechanism that is based on intelligence. He suggests that college is a “four-year intelligence test”, at the end of which, each student receives a single score in the form of a “G.P.A. that professional schools and employers can trust as a measure of intellectual capacity”. College should be a challenging way to sift through students; a process to find the most academically accomplished students for elite schools and future employers. This theory describes a systematic evaluation of test taking and hoop jumping. Those who favor this viewpoint agree that there are many people that are not prepared for a college education.…