In March of 1992, Dr. Richard Sanford wrote an outspoken paper opposing the claims of the global warming hysteria of recent time. Sanford discusses how people accept global warming theories as scientific fact without questioning their validity. I can honestly say that I was one of these people who agreed with the media's interpretation of these theories. After reviewing the pro global warming material in the course text, Environmental Science, written by G. Tyler Miller, and reading several articles on the opposition of global warming, I find myself becoming not a hardcore skeptic, but someone that will no longer take information at face value without reviewing as many of the particulars as possible.…
The author, “Contoski, asserts that global warming is scientifically unproven and that the facts reveal that the earth periodically experiences changing climates” (Global Warming Is a Myth). Contoski “denies that carbon dioxide emissions have any noticeable impact on global temperatures claims that human-made emissions are insignificant when compared to carbon output of natural sources that have always been beyond human control.” (Global Warming is a Myth)…
The vast amount of opposing views from qualified scientists on global warming can easily confuse any reader. The manipulation of data is a main culprit, which is largely to blame for the confusion. This tactic, carefully used by global warming skeptics, falsely makes information appear to prove that global warming does not exist. Fred Singer’s 10 year graph, which shows no rise in global temperatures is a perfect example. While the 10 years Singer has selected show no warming in temperature, when the graph is viewed in its entirety there is a substantial warming trend. This term is known as “going down the up escalator” (Upin) and is used as an attempt to prove global warming does not exist. This is very dangerous because while skeptic’s present…
In “Climate of Complete Certainty”, Bret Stephens asserts that the scepticism towards climate change results from the total certainty scientists impresses onto the public about global warming, despite scientific errors (Stephens, 2017). He criticizes the scientific community for being misleading with data that he claims has not been thoroughly investigated. With that, it is evident what Stephens neglects to understand is how the scientific community operates and why there is scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change. Climate science does not claim total certainty, but the interpretation of the present empirical evidence points towards anthropogenic climate change.…
Concerning Climate Change “Clear, Catastrophic threats, Manne opens the article with an anecdote, that a “part of the english syllabus [as a schoolboy] was “clear thinking”” (Manne 2011). This anecdote should set up a relevance and an accessibility to the reader drawing them in and sympathising with the argument that will be put forward. Almost a third of the article is dense with data. “1500 or so leading climate scientists” (Manne 2011), “928 scientific papers” (Manne 2011), “...peerreviewed scientific journals” (Manne 2011), a part of a letter written to every US senator from the American Association for the Advancement of Science in regards to climate change. Following this Manne uses an appeal to authority as a persuasive technique. Climate change being an issue where expertise is paramount, the use of authority anchors the argument to what is right and wrong, clear. Manne does this by bringing up Naomi Oreskes, a historian of science, whose work showed evidence of the consensus of the fundamental theory of climate change. The work was included in the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in which it was the basis of the report. Finally, and probably most importantly, the article uses science as an authority. Science deals with facts and evidence, therefore using a definate as an authority it is effective in persuading the reader that the stance of the article is the right stance.…
It is fair to say that hockey has evolved over the years. Gear has changed and so have the players. The game has become faster and stronger and a lot more off ice training and hard work is necessary to go pro unlike it used to be in the 19th century.…
Every scientist will agree and anyone else who has any idea what climate change is. Through this, Pollan answers the question, “Why Bother?” but his true purpose, inspiring people to actually “Bother” fails. His ignorance of the lower class and humanity's subconscious Moral Balancing combined with his use of cheap scare tactics makes his arguments fall flat and inspires readers to roll their eyes and enjoy their plant destroying comforts while they can.…
The idea of climate change, for many, is an opinionated subject with much discussion of whether it is a real issue or just a natural phenomenon. However in recent years it is clear to see that trends in the Earth’s climate and surface temperature has spiked to levels never seen before. Despite all the evidence of the high levels of greenhouses gases and the rise in temperature, many still believe that there is no connection between the two, and that the Earth is just going through its natural cycle.…
Anthropogenic climate change is an establishment phenomenon. Within the scientific community, the question is no longer whether climate change will occur, but at what rate, with what effects, and what, if anything, we can do about it. The biggest culprit in climate change is an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, which is generated primarily through burning fossils. Earth’s average temperature is based on daily measurements taken at several thousand land based meteorological stations around the world, as well as data from weather balloons, orbiting satellites, transoceanic ships, and hundreds of sea surface buoys with temperature sensors. Scientists around the world have researched global climate change for several decades. As the evidence has accumulated, the most qualified to address the issue have concluded that temperatures have increased over the past century, that it is extremely unlikely that natural causes can explain the warming, and the human produced greenhouse gases are the plausible explanation for the warming that has occurred.…
Why challenge an observation that is backed up by heaps of quantitative observations since the mid 1900s and has imminent impact on our world today? Today, people in support of global cooling are either making a fool of themselves in order to garner attention or have been living under a rock for most of the 21st century. However, people concerned about global warming dismiss the claims concerning a present global cooling phenomenon too readily, almost like Broca's claim of the inferiority of women following his meticulous collection of data comparing the size of women's brains to men's brains. Stephen Gould's essay "Women's Brains" deconstructs the prevailing belief of women inferiority that was backed up by Broca's research in the 19th century in order to make the argument that nothing should be taken for granted during his time when evolutionary scientists were being challenged by dominant religious…
Sports are a very big part of everyday life for many people. There are advantages and disadvantages to all sports, more advantages in some than others. The game of Soccer has many more advantages over the game of Field Hockey, which undoubtedly makes it the better sport of the two. Soccer is a sport that consists of 90 minutes of hard play while field hockey is 70 minutes of stop and go due to the whistle being blown so often.…
Street hockey is a form of hockey play on surfaces like basketball courts, indoor, streets, and nettless tennis courts. The point of the game is to shoot the puck into the others teams net and score. Each team must have 6 players, 3 frontlines 2 defense and 1 goalie. Street hockey equipment is especially designed for street hockey. The stick is wooden with a plastic tip and a plastic puck or a ball that doesn’t bounce at all. Each teams has only 2 timeouts each lasting around 1 minute and the game is split into 3 15 minute periods. There is also a break in between each period lasting about 3-5 minutes.…
False Claims about Climate Change One thing we face every day are the lies that are given about anything we have going on. But most importantly, based on this report, its about the lies we hear of climate change. Climate change is something that is currently happening without us knowing, it is global warming. ‘Global warming is a phenomenon in which weather patterns and temperatures are changing rapidly and unpredictably, and on a global scale.…
r o v e otherwise. To complete the Warming Debate analogy, I’ll add that to date, there is no credible evidence to demonstrate that the climatological changes we’ve seen since the mid-1800’s are outside the bounds of natural variability inherent in the earth’s climate system.…
Sceptics have used various methods in their battle with real science. According to John Cook writer for Skeptical Science the most common methods used by global warming sceptics are conspiracy theories, fake experts, carry picking, impossible exportations of what research can deliver and misrepresentation and logical fallacies (Cook, 2010)…