Preview

Summary Of Kevin Rudd's Sorry Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
345 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Kevin Rudd's Sorry Speech
Kevin Rudd Sorry Speech analysis

Kevin Rudd (Prime Minister at the time) made an apology to the “Stolen Generation” from the Parliament House, Canberra, 2008. The “Stolen Generation” were the children of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent who were removed from the Australian Federal and State government agencies and church missions, under the acts of their respective Parliaments. Kevin Rudd’s aim was to inform the Indigenous community of the Australian Governments ‘wrong doings’ to their people of the past. Kevin Rudd informed the Aboriginal community and the Parliament of his intentions to equalise the opportunities for all, no matter of the colour of their skin.
Kevin Rudd utilises phonetic structures such as emphatic stress
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Julia Gillard's Apology Of Forced Annoy
    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julia Gillard's Apology Of Forced Annoy

    The shameful practice of forced adoption was enforced especially during the 1960s in which free love and drug culture was becoming increasingly popular. To this end, an apology was given to the people directly affected by this injustice in an effort to open a dialogue on the issue and acknowledge the pain and suffering caused as a result. Throughout the apology, Julia Gillard uses a variety of techniques to the convey the sincerity of the message and to successfully speak on behalf of the Australian people. Gillard continuously states, “…. we say sorry”, which uses utilises both repetition and inclusive language in order to not only emphasis on the seriousness of the issue, but to invoke sense of responsibility to the issue. Gillard also states,…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Noel Pearson Summary
    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Noel Pearson Summary

    In Pearson’s speech, the criticism of John Howard, who was at the time the Prime Minister, throughout the speech shows the idea that the past Australian Governments had made a mistake in treating Aboriginal Australians in the past, and that modern day government is trying to forget that past because of the guilt and shame it had caused the Australian government in the past. Pearson directly quotes comments made by John Howard during a radio interview, but uses these comments to emphasise his own key arguments rather than support those being made by Howard. By using quotes from other sources he broadens the scope of his argument and makes his own argument less of a personal crusade. Pearson also focuses on National Identity and determining “who we are”. Pearson acknowledges the current debate of National Identity by making reference to the “hot button issue” about “the guilt about Australia’s colonial Identity”. The extended metaphor of button pressing and the cliché “You would not need to be a political genius” stresses the “great electoral resonance” of the National Identity debate. Another technique Pearson applies is the use of inclusive language in his speech. This is cleverly woven into the speech by repeated references to “our nation” and the action that “we” have to take to correct the injustices of the past. This facilitates Pearson’s depiction of Aboriginal rights being a social, political, legal and religious concern for the nation as a whole and thus presents Pearson’s view on National Identity and the global perception of “who we are”. The past shows that Australia as a nation…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stolen Generation Research Paper
    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stolen Generation Research Paper

    Understandably the Aboriginals had suffered quite traumatically after the Stolen Generation. Numerous amount of them ended up with mental illnesses, alcoholism, violence and welfare dependence and that is just naming a few of the hundreds of results from the stolen generation. The aboriginal people were the only ones that were affected by this eyesore of an event. The stolen generation was addressed poorly by the community and the government as majority to all of them were white Australians. It was treated so badly by the white because they were the ones that agreed and contributed to the Stolen Generation therefore they had no sympathy for the Aboriginal parents and children. Although years after this act the government and parliament apologized…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does a Speech Maintain Interest Through Rhetorical Treatment of Human Aspirations and Beliefs
    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Does a Speech Maintain Interest Through Rhetorical Treatment of Human Aspirations and Beliefs

    Noel Pearson, one of Australia’s most influential Aboriginal leaders, delivered his speech to a highly distinguished academic audience at a time when Australia was struggling with “moral and political turbulence” regarding “guilt about Australia’s colonial history”. Pearson expresses his own thoughts on Aboriginal reconciliation and the necessary steps that need to…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    HSC Mod B speech Intros
    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    HSC Mod B speech Intros

    The purpose of PJ Keating's speech as Prime minister of Australia in 1992 was to encourage Aboriginal People and their supporters to have confidence in a future that would allow them to participate in Australian life to the same extent as other Australians.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Mabo Decision
    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Mabo Decision

    However, the initial announcement of the apology caused a split in the Liberal party, as some believed that it would create a guilty culture in Australia. Yet, Judi Moylan, who was the former Liberal Minister, said “I think as a nation we owe an apology. We shouldn't be thinking about it as an individual apology — it's an apology that is coming from the nation state because it was governments that did these things.” The apology was then considered necessary. At 9:30 on the day of the speech, Kevin Rudd began the apology. “...The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia's history by righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future. We apologise for the laws and policies of successive parliaments and governments that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians. We apologise especially for the removal of ATSI children from their families, their communities and their country...We the parliament of Australia respectfully request that this apology be received in the spirit in which it is offered as part of the healing of the nation….” The speech was a significant moment in ATSI peoples lives, as, according the to The Bringing Them Home Report, this was the first step to healing and was largely symbolic and important in ATSI…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Impact Of Australian Government's Assimilation Policy On Aboriginal Children
    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Impact Of Australian Government's Assimilation Policy On Aboriginal Children

    The Australian Government's assimilation policy was a policy of absorbing Aboriginal people into white society through the process of removing children from their families. The idea of this policy was to breed out and abolish the aboriginal society and to assimilate them into the white community. The impact that this policy had on the indigenous Australians was very negative as many children were forcibly taken from their families. One way the assimilation policy impacted the aboriginals was by ‘stealing’ the aboriginal children. These children were named ‘the stolen generation’.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justin Trudeau's Speech
    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justin Trudeau's Speech

    What constitutes a great and memorable speech? Following the recent results of the October 19th federal election in Canada, two major speeches were delivered – Justin Trudeau’s victory speech and Steven Harper’s defeat speech. Just as with President Barack Obama’s 2008 victory speech ("Top 10 Presidential Addresses of All Time"), people with political preference may rank one of the two speeches more highly solely due to the identity of the speaker. Thankfully however, Lifehack provides some invaluable insights on the basic factors of a memorable public address. According to the website, imagery increases the effectiveness of a strong public speech, as does connection with the audience and persuasive, powerful statements. Taking those factors into account will help in evaluating both Trudeau’s and Harper’s speeches with a minimal amount of political bias.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Paul Keating
    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Paul Keating

    A key achievement in Paul Keating’s leadership was the recognition of Indigenous Australian’s rights and acknowledging their position in society. Keating established a Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, working alongside Aboriginal Australians, which sought to implement different strategies to ameliorate the injustices. In June 1992 the High Court recognised Aboriginal land rights by making a decision that native title existed in the Mabo case. Keating supported this notion and delivered the Redfern Speech in December 1992, apologising for the wrongdoings of white society and recognising Aboriginal rights. This was a significant moment and is still recognised today because it was the first time in Australian history that the government attempted to reconcile the relationship with Indigenous Australians. Today, people reflect on this speech and can still find areas that need to be improved upon to ensure an equal society.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should We Change the Date of “Australia Day”?
    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should We Change the Date of “Australia Day”?

    Changing Australia Day’s date would help strengthen the broken bonds between Indigenous Australians and white Australians. On 13 February 2008, Former Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd apologised to all Indigenous Australians…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Stolen Generation Research Paper
    • 10258 Words
    • 42 Pages

    The Stolen Generation Research Paper

    The Stolen Generations (also known as Stolen children) were the children of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent who were removed from their families by the Australian Federal and State government agencies and church missions, under acts of their respective parliaments. The removals occurred in the period between approximately 1909[1] and 1969,[2][3] although in some places children were still being taken until the 1970s.[4][5][6]…

    • 10258 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stolen Generation In Australia
    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stolen Generation In Australia

    Indigenous Australians are a prominently disadvantaged group that are subject to extreme discrimination impacting on their life’s. The Stolen generation had severe negative impacts on the victims of the stolen generation and has continued to negatively affect future generations. Further negative implications have stemmed from this extreme action. And it is the cause of many issues of inequality today among Indigenous Australians. This essay will define the stolen generation, outline and discuss the negative impacts that have stemmed from it and then link the impacts of assimilation to theories such as functionalist theory, structural, etc.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apologizing In President Clinton Speech
    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page

    Apologizing In President Clinton Speech

    In President Clinton speech it sounds like he is apologizing to the people of the Rwandan genocide like he is the one who did it to them. But when he says “We owe to those who died and to those who survived, who loved them, our every effort to increase our vigilance and strengthen” it makes it seem like he was apologizing for something he did himself, but he did not commit the Rwanda genocide. Also when he says “We owe to all the people of the world who are at risk because each bloodletting hastens.” This sound like he is apologizing because it sounds like he owes them something for what he did. But President Clinton didn’t do anything to anyone. He is apologizing in this speech when he had no part in the Rwanda genocide. And I can get why…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Impact Of Assimilation On Aboriginals
    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Impact Of Assimilation On Aboriginals

    Beginning in 1910 and ending in the 1970s, Australians Federal and State government agencies and church missions made a policy to forcibly take many aboriginal and Torres Strait children away from their families in an attempt to destroy the Aboriginal race and culture. There was an impact on the aboriginals with a particular policy the Australian Government had introduced, which was the policy of ‘Assimilation’. This policy was to encourage many Aboriginal people to give up their culture, language, tradition, knowledge and spirituality to basically become white Australians. Unfortunately this policy didn’t give the Aboriginals the same rights as white Australians, as a result of discrimination, aboriginals were moved to live in special housing…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julia Gillard Political Policy
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julia Gillard Political Policy

    The decision left the Government’s policy in complete disarray and steps into the tune of unpopular decisions made by the Gillard government. During this time, Julia Gillard began to lose support from the very people that put her in power, and many began looking back to Kevin Rudd for answers. Gillard, in attempts to solidate her position as Prime Minister, was accused of ‘airbrushing’ out the achievements of her predecessor and, just as in the years before, a leadership change was in speculation throughout the media. During an attack by Tony Abbott in a Parliament session, Gillard would stand up to him and calling him a ‘misogynistic pig,’ while ridiculing all those who said her recently deceased father ‘died of shame’ in relation to her as a daughter. The speech to Abbott split voters, some saying it was about time she’d chewed him out, and other’s believing it was wrong of her to say such a…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics