Her view on neuroplasticity manages to account for many studied schools of thought. Freudian and neo-Freudian beliefs combine to form the concept that neuroplasticity results in sex, power, and recognition acting as unconscious motives that lead adolescents to engage in risky behavior. Humanism embodies Galle’s views on the brain being shaped by subjective experience. There are mentions to behaviorism, stating that reinforcement leads to enhanced neurocircuitry patterns. Functionalism is relevant to neuroplasticity in their definitions and principles; Functionalism focuses on individuals adjusting their behavior to adapt to the environment while plasticity often refers to the brain adjusting to environment and experience. Most prominent within the research are the modern biological and sociocultural perspective. These are discussed in depth through the development of the mind and chemical changes affecting adolescents, paving the idea of plasticity. In turn, this opens the mind up, leaving the individuals especially prone to social sway. Again, Galle took an unbelievably eclectic viewpoint when conducting her …show more content…
When young individuals with severe disorders were prescribed psychotropic drugs, case studies found that they often responded poorly. In turn, their parents opted for their child to utilize yoga and the practice of mindfulness, in addition to cognitive and dynamic psychotherapy. These alternative treatment combinations prompted far more improvement than mood-altering medicine in the observed adolescents. This struck as especially interesting because it shows pharmacotherapy not being as effective, essentially skirting around the biological factor surrounding mental health treatment. If a drug that is meant to repress symptoms fails, how can an Ancient Indian physical exercise fare better? It would lead one to believe that engaging in yoga transcends the biological perspective, directly affecting mood in a positive manner without consulting the mind. Instead, Galle, who takes a biological stance throughout the article, would argue that adolescents, due to plasticity and an undeveloped mind, respond poorly to medicine and benefit greater from the therapeutic exercises during this “turbulent stage of development”. She reaches the conclusion that in these cases, a “biopsychosocial and health-building model” is most successful in reaching the full positive potential of neuroplasticity among adolescents. From this, Galle draws that