Preview

Summary Of Socrates Three Parts Of The Human Soul

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
370 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Socrates Three Parts Of The Human Soul
Journal Entry #1 Book IV 435d-445e seems to be Socrates’ argument about the three parts of the human soul and how the human soul with its three parts are parallel to the republic and the three different kinds of citizens. What I am interested in is the methods that Socrates implements to come to his conclusions. More specifically, I would like to talk about Socrates’ analogies that he uses to come to his conclusions. Very interesting, to say the least, analogies that Socrates uses is physical actions to explain opposing parts of the soul working together(153). To begin his argument about a three part soul, Socrates first tries to explain that opposing parts of the soul can work together. To explain this conclusion, Socrates uses two analogies

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dan starts to heal from his devastating injury caused by a motorcycle crash. Although, the doctor told Dan he wouldn’t be able to do gymnastics for another 6 months. After begging the gatekeeper to enter and compete he was finally able to try- out for the olympics. In order to prepare for the olympics, Socrates helps Dan train by setting up endurance courses and meditation techniques. Joy comes back and Dan feels more compassionate towards her than ever.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One argument Socrates uses is that snow always brings cold, as fire always brings hot. Fire will not bring cold and snow will not bring hot. He uses these opposites to say that soul brings life with it; therefore the soul will never bring death, the opposite of life. Anything that doesn't fall to death is indestructible. The soul must be indestructible. I agree with Socrates that the soul lives on. It makes sense to me that the soul is indestructible with his reasoning behind it.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to prove that Socrates is successful in replying to the objections of Simmias and Cebes in Plato’s Phaedo, and in proving the soul to be immortal.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his philosophy, Plato places a large emphasis on the importance of the idea of justice. This emphasis can be seen especially in his work ‘The Republic’ where, through his main character Socrates, he attempts to define the nature of justice and to justify this definition. One of the methods used by Socrates to strengthen or rather explain his argument on justice is through his famous city-soul analogy, where a comparison between a just city and a just soul/individual is made. Through this analogy, Socrates attempts to explain the nature of justice, how it is the virtue of the soul and is therefore intrinsically valuable to the individual, but it becomes apparent in the analysis and evaluation of the analogy that there may have been several purposes behind it. Inconsistencies within the analogy itself also raise questions to the validity in Plato’s definition and justification of justice.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I personally think that with the arguments Socrates has provided, gave me a clue on how to care for the soul and not the body. The body shouldn’t be of main concern considering it is not something that is really essential in life. I liked how when Socrates’s accompanies was in confusion of something, he would change that in a sense of breaking the reasonings down to them thoroughly.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death of Socrates

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The Death of Socrates” was painted by a French painter . His name was Jacques Louis David. The painting represents the scene of the death of Greek philosopher Socrates. He was condemned to die by drinking hemlock for the expression of his ideas against those of Athens' and corrupting the minds of the youth. The painting also depicts both Plato and Crito, with the former sitting at the edge of the bed and the latter clutching the knee of Socrates. Socrates had the choice to go into exile and , hence, give up his philosophic vocation or be sentenced to death by drinking hemlock. Socrates chose death. In this painting, someone hands a confident Socrates the goblet of hemlock. Socrates' hand pointing to the heavens indicating his defiance of the gods and fearless attitude to his death.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Good Life

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What makes a person’s life good? Is it virtue? Pleasure? Power? In Plato’s Gorgias, though didn’t end up with a mutual agreement, Socrates and Callacles fight each other’s views and quarrel to come to a conclusion of the meaning of a good life.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gadfly In Antigone

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    reflection as well. Thus, Socrates acts as the catalyst for a reevaluation of one’s self, which, on a…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Alcibiades continues with them talking about how the soul is separate from the body. There is nothing that has more authority than the soul within the body. Socrates then states that people who know their parts of the body know what belongs the them, but not themselves. This means that their body parts are for their bodies, but they body parts do not belong to the soul. Again. Socrates brings up that people who tend to their bodies tend to what belongs to them rather than what belongs to themselves. This helps Socrates bring up the point that the person who loves the body is someone who who loved something that belonged to the body, but Socrates is the one who loves Alcibiades’ soul and not his body. Love is loving another person’s soul as long as they are making progress. The person who loves Alcibiades soul will not leave him unlike the people who love the body. Socrates will love him unless he became corrupt and ugly. The body changes and the soul continues to grow. Socrates points out that he is…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates was a mind-body dualist. This means he thought that the mind is composed of a different substance to the brain. The argument that the mind is made of a substance that does obey the laws of physics is known as physicalism or materialism.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    a complete household. In fact Aristotle went as far as to say that a slave was…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Platos Tripartite Soul

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages

    It is helpful at this point to identify Plato’s earlier conception of the soul, in order to see how this is ennobled into its tripartite structure in The Republic. In the Protagoras, Socrates admits that men are not always guided by intellect alone, citing that ‘…when men act contrary to knowledge they are overcome by pain, or pleasure, or some of those affections which I was just now mentioning…’ . However what is of note is that Plato believes that whilst human behaviour may be influenced by factors other than reason, if one has rational…

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. What are the three distinct parts to the tripartite soul? Explain how Socrates thinks about the three different parts of the soul. What do you think of this notion of the soul?…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays