In the chapter two of “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”, written by Paulo Freire, it talks about the two education styles, “banking concept of education,” and “problem-posing education”. “Banking education” is “narrative education”, which means teacher teach and students taught. According to Freire, the contradiction between teachers and students is the core topic the chapter two. For example, “The teacher presents himself to his students as their necessary oppsite; by considering their ignorance absolute, he justifies his own existence” (72). Additionally, Freire crtisizes the traditional narrative education. He claims that the narrative education will stifle the creativity of students (71). After…
Freire describes the “banking” concept of education by saying that “Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor. Instead of communicating, the teacher issues communiqués and makes deposits which the students patiently receive, memorize, and repeat” (Freire 244). He uses the metaphor of depositor and depositories to relate to a bank. The organized mindlessness of business between a bank and its contents is portrayed as the style of teaching which is seen as ineffective. It is seen in his eyes as unfavorable because the student does not have an opportunity to form his/her own ideas and think critically. On the other hand, Freire proposes the problem-posing style of education. He explains how power and authority are both mutual between the student and the teacher when he says, “The teacher is no longer merely the-one-who-teaches, but one who is himself taught in dialogue with the students, who in turn while being taught also teach” (249). Freire stresses the importance of problems for the mind in order for critical thinking to take place. Because of the mind is at work, people are able to form their own opinions and ideas instead of just storing information and accepting it. Even though Freire recommends problem-posing education, the fact of the matter is that most people are faced with the banking style of teaching, like Rodriguez in his essay, “The Achievement of Desire”.…
In Paulo Friere’s article “The Banking Concept”, Paulo argues that the banking method is an efficient way of learning in the education system. The students are to sit down, stay quiet, received information, memorize it, and then remember it. Since this method requires them to simply memorize the information, the students don’t completely understand fully the information that they are taking in. The underlying message here about the banking concept is that the teachers feed students the information, acting as if they are completely informed about the whole subject, and then suggesting that the student knows nothing. There is no relationship established between the student and the teacher. The student…
My experience in the education system was not anything like ‘The “Banking” Concept of Education’ critiques it. It specifies on critiquing the teacher-student relationship and I would like to argue a few points made in this reading. Such as, how the teacher presents himself or herself, the relationship involving the teacher and student, and how students never discover that they also educate the teacher. I could argue these points through experiences I’ve had over my years as a student throughout the education system, I will focus on high school.…
The education system has caused students to become robots. Everyday they come into class, take notes and never once question the material they are learning. Paulo Freire states that “Education must begin with the solution to the teacher-student contradiction,” in his essay “The ‘Banking’ Concept of Education.” In order to solve this contradiction here at West Chester University; students need to start thinking critically and there needs to be a teacher-student partnership.…
Paulo Freire’s “problem-posing” teaching method is shown in “The Banking Concept of Education” through clear contradictions to the “banking method”. He makes several arguments against the banking method by attacking common teaching faux pas and explaining his method of problem-posing education, where the teacher-student relationship is of equal partnership. Freire also argues that the use of the banking method makes teachers more concerned with getting information out to the students than worrying if they understand it or not. Instead of “educating through the practice of freedom” (Freire 327), standardized tests like the Regents in New York and the MCAS in Massachusetts, “educates [students] as the practice of domination” (Freire, 327), limiting them to a strict, inanimate curriculum.…
Today’s education system has been reduced to teachers assume the position of holders of knowledge and who are supposed to then transfers said knowledge to students. Paul Friere (1993) in his article “the banking concept of education” has demonstrated this aspect…
Education is defined as, "an act or process of imparting or acquiring general knowledge, developing the powers of reasoning and judgment, and generally of preparing oneself or others intellectually for a mature life" (Jackson). In Paulo Freire 's “The Banking Concept of Education” he uses several similes, metaphors and analogies to bring across his main point - the relationship between teachers and students, and the way the teaching process takes place. One specific problem that Freire points out in the "Banking" concept of education is that “students have become “containers,” into "receptacles" to be "filled" by the teacher. The more completely he fills the receptacles, the better a teacher he is. The more meekly the receptacles permit themselves to be filled, the better students they are” (Freire, para 4). Freire believes that there is another way to educate in the classroom that would not only benefit the students but help the teachers as well. In the “Problem-Posing” method the teacher would begin by explaining his point of view on the subject being taught, and then the student could take the information and use it to his or her advantage by implementing the information in their lives. Problem-posing is more than a technique that teaches critical thinking; it is a philosophy, a way of thinking about students and their ability to think critically and to reflect analytically on their lives (Nixon-Ponder). In this classroom teaching style, the student has moved from being a spectator to a re-creator, together the teachers and students help each other learn through authentic thinking. Both the student and teacher are able to add to their knowledge using the information from one another’s ideas. Freire points out in his essay, "Education must begin with the solution of the teacher-student contradiction, by reconciling the poles of the contradiction so that both are simultaneously teachers and student"…
In Paulo Freire’s work, The Banking Concept of Education, he expresses that the modern education system is similar to that of a banking system because students are not learning despite taking notes and attending class all the time, they are information banks that take down information but don’t retain anything; Students have become robots. This is another fault in the education system aside from the discrepancy in education due to socioeconomic status. "Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor (Freire, 72)." If professors don’t have enthusiasm or passion for what they are teaching then how can students reciprocate the same passion for learning? There is no connection…
Submitting children to this form of oppression through this education suppresses a person’s natural instinct of inquiry: an instinct that challenges systems that are currently set in place to bring about change in our modern day society. Through banking education, people are not taught to fill in the missing clues and thus are not even made aware that there are gaps in their “knowledge” in the first place. A belief that all that is known is what is being taught becomes a mindset that is hard to escape. There is no need to venture if all that one needs to know is right in front of them. This is why students do not see the oppression they face in this system.…
What does the opinion expressed in Paulo Freire’s “banking” education metaphor really say about modern society and the disenfranchised? Freire begins Chapter Two of his novel “Pedagogy of the Oppressed,” by analyzing the teacher-student relationship that is characteristic of the Socratic/Lecture Teaching Methods. Freire refers to these teaching methods as “the banking concept of education,” where the students are considered empty bank accounts just passively and robotically waiting to be filled with deposits from the omniscient professors. (1) While at first, the metaphor seems novel, upon closer inspection, Friere is making a bold and controversial statement about the current power-hungry and oppressive social construct. A system designed and manufactured by the wealthy in order to polarize the divergent social classes and maintain the status quo. But all is not lost, there is a light at the end of the tunnel-the light of communication.…
Who is Paulo Freire you may ask? Well Paulo Freire was a brazilian ideologist whose ideas have shaped the modern concept to education. In his essay The ‘Banking’ Concept of Education, Paulo analysis the student-teacher relationship through two different styles of education, the problem posing style of education and the banking concept style of education. I noticed he describes both the problem posing concept as well as the idea of the banking concept of education in more terms of the teachers and rather not the students. He makes most of his time explaining the basics of the banking concept and terribly fails to give examples of a student in the problem posing of education.…
A key element that Rodriguez and Freire both speak of is banking education. Freire feels that this type of education is almost useless. Banking is no more than just listening to someone speak at you and then regurgitating the information. Both speak about education in the context of the student-teacher relationship. The banking theory of education only allows for the teacher to rule over the classroom and allows for little interaction with students. Banking turns students into "receptacle" (pg 260) bins that are crammed with information that the teacher chooses to fill…
Freire, P.(1999), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, In: Pollard, A. (Ed.) Readings for Reflective Teaching, Challenging the ‘Banking’ Concept of Education, 2002, p.365. London: Continuum International Publishing…
In The Banking Concept of Education, Paulo Freire introduces two terms to define the educational system. The First term is banking education, which basically means memorizing and learning the facts without learning what they really mean. The Second term is problem-posing education which makes students question the world around them and challenges them to learn and think critically. There are many controversies about education some people believe children should be taught by the "banking" concept of education, and some think children should be taught by "problem posing." In fact, both concepts of education should be required in teaching students. Combining "banking" and "problem-posing" will bring out students’ potential. The combination will…