Preview

Summary Of The Death Penalty By Daniel Lachance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
792 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Death Penalty By Daniel Lachance
Where there is society there have always been criminals, ones that would cause grief among others for the benefit of themselves. Accurately accessing the integrity of a nation includes how it deals with its criminals. In American circumstances, it is to kill them. “What Will Doom the Death Penalty” which was published in 2014, is an article by the New York Times enlightening left-wing ideas on capital punishment. The author of the article is Daniel LaChance, who is currently a history professor at Emory University. LaChance clearly shows his discontent with America’s system of the death penalty, calling it “…an intolerable affront to human dignity”. Whether or not capital punishment is an “affront to human dignity”, it is certainly a sign of …show more content…
In 1972, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chase, came to the conclusion that the death sentence was unconstitutionally unfair. After the decision, it became the states responsibility to dictate their own policies on the matter. LaChance believes that the system had corrupted conservatives who “…seized the opportunity to advance a broader agenda of reclaiming a government captured by liberals.” He also argued that in recent times there have been those that were indeed wrongly accused of crimes that were sentenced to death row and found innocent years later. Everyone can agree that killing the good and innocent is wrong, but those tried in court before the innovations of our modern justice and science systems did not receive sympathy of any sort. LaChance goes in depth describing the tribulations that an innocent man would have to go through to appeal a courts sentence. He writes “There were not enough lawyers to do the work” and “…the process would take up to 25 years”. Reiterating the fact that there was a negligible amount of state-appointed lawyers that would take inmate appeals and even if they did, inmates would have to wait upwards of 7 years to receive one just to begin the appeal …show more content…
The state criminal and judiciary law department of Kansas has concluded that it costs the state about 72% more in expenses for death penalty cases as compared to non-death penalty cases such as life in prison. The study examined that a death penalty case fully executed cost a median of $1.26 million; that money could be utilized elsewhere in a much more beneficial way for society. According to deathpenaltyinfo.org, a website built to spread information and awareness about the death sentence, as of April, 2015 there are about 3,002 inmates currently on death row. Multiply that by $1.26 million per person and we find that the cost of keeping all of the inmates to be killed by lethal injection costs America nearly $3.8 billion. If we take all of the inmates currently on death row and pardon them to life in prison, it would save the United States at least $2.6

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Summary

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the author the modern executioner's job has changed, likewise, the death penalty has also changed. Jeffrey Toobin suggests killing prisoners who are on death row is necessitated but harm should not be caused. The author believes that the death penalty is uncivilized in our civilized society. Toobin also affirms the fact that the death penalty has become unpalatable and gruesome because of the great length's states have gone to come up with other ways of execution. For…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bedau, Cassell. 2003. Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital Punishment? New York: Oxford University Press…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Edward I. Koch's essay, "Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life", readers view the opinions Koch has toward the death penalty in today's world. Koch reviews a variety of excuses to abolish the death penalty. He argues the importance of the death penalty, as well as, argues excuses of the death penalty opponents. He argues the ethics and politics towards the importance and support of the death penalty. In the following essay readers will see an evaluation of Koch's essay. The evaluation will: contain a brief overview of Koch's essay, state whether or not Koch's arguments were strong and persuasive, and state whether the essay was successful in what it was trying to say.…

    • 954 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Koch

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his essay, the author includes seven main arguments opposing capital punishment and refutes them. People may find that the death penalty is a barbaric act and Koch argues this point by suggesting that the method of lethal injection is actually quite humane and literally painless. He also argues that although no other democratic country imposes the death penalty as a form of punishment, no other country boasts a murder rate as high as the United States. The author contends with those who believe capital punishment diminishes life’s value by suggesting the contrary. He has found those who are sentenced to death have been judged fairly and with a great deal of examination. Koch then refutes the argument of capital punishment as a state-sanctioned murder by acknowledging that the state holds much different rights and responsibilities than the individual.…

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers do deserve nothing less than a death for themselves and that although everyone is born with the right to live, criminals lose these rights at the moment when they take away the rights of another human and only by punishing them in such way, the society is affirming the value which is placed on the victim’s right to live.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cost of the Death Penalty

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the death penalty. Costanzo provides a review of the history of the death penalty, a review of how the death penalty process is working today, questions on whether or not if the death penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He also questions if the death penalty is fairly applied and the impact, if any, that it has on deterrence. He closely examines the public's support of the death penalty and questions the morality of the death penalty. Finally, Costanzo provides his own resolution and alternative to the death penalty. Each of these items allows the reader an easy, and once again, neat view of how the death penalty can work against out society rather than for it.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Zimring, F. (2003). The contradictions of American capital punishment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 6 Apr. 2010.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment throughout history has had many faces in our society. In the early twentieth century capital punishment was viewed as an integral part of the criminal justice system. In the United States alone approximately thirteen thousand people have been legally executed sine the colonial times (ACLU, 2003). By the 1930's up to 150 people were executed yearly, because of various legal challenges the execution rate was almost zero by 1967. In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court banned the practice of capital punishment, citing the death penalty as it was practiced, cruel and unusual punishment arbitrarily administered by the courts and thus unconstitutional in Furman v. Georgia (Costanzo, 18). In 1976, in Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty stating that under guided discretion the courts again could impose capital punishment for crimes such as murder with special circumstances (Costanzo, 21). Since having the death penalty reinstated in 1976 by the Supreme Court, society has a whole still favors capital punishment, but because of the nature of the punishment there is still a split among society as to the appropriateness of the sanction. In today’s society there are those that are apposed and there are those that are in favor of the death penalty, but the majority still views capital punishment as a staple in the criminal justice system. Public opinion polls show approximately seventy percent of the U.S population currently approves of the use capital punishment (ACLU, 2003). Even with a high approval rate among the population in the United States there is still a large population of people with religious arguments against capital punishment, catholic society by the nature of humanity and evolution has realized that capital punishment is less and less a moral and ethical punishment for capital crimes such as murder. In examining the history of the Catholic Church and the Catholic Church’s moral teachings in regards to the death penalty…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof. We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. However, the risk of making a mistake with the extraordinary due process applied in death penalty cases is very small, and there is no credible evidence to show that any innocent persons have been executed at least since the death penalty was reactivated in 1976... The inevitability of a mistake should not serve as grounds to eliminate the death penalty any more than the risk of having a fatal wreck should make automobiles illegal..."…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One reason the death penalty is wrong is because it is just too expensive. On August 3, 2006, Diane Grey Davis, an avid blogger, researched this topic and posted a blog on the Greensboropeerpressure website showing the cost of execution versus the cost of housing an inmate for life. It said that in California, the death penalty costs taxpayers $114 million per year beyond the costs of keeping convicts locked up for life. Also, in Indiana, the costs of the death penalty exceed the complete costs of life without parole sentences by 38%. In Texas, the death penalty costs on average $2.3 million, about three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for 40 years (Davis, 2006). Studies show that the cost of building a maximum-security prison cell is $63,000, which breaks down to about $5,000 a year in principal and interest. The annual cost to maintain an inmate in this cell is about $20,000 a year, which when combined, equal a total of $25,000 a year to hold an inmate in prison. An inmate serving a life term…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has been used around the world for many thousands of years as a way of enforcing justice when someone has done wrong by what standards that the cultures have. Over the past few centuries capital punishment has started to be questioned by many people in Europe and in the United States. Many people who support the death penalty cite reasons such as deterrence and not wanting to spend money a person who will never be a productive member of society again. Many who are in opposition to the death penalty say that the death penalty is killing innocent people and is actually not saving any money at all and that it is in fact costing too much and that it is wrong to simply kill someone who commits a crime. There are also questions to the fairness of the death penalty and many who question if it is being applied fairly. Both sides of the debate over the morality and legitimacy of capital punishment will be presented in this paper with this author taking one side. While the thought of having someone put to death is not something that anyone would like, the death penalty is the only way for ultimate justice to be administered for victims provided that it is fairly administered.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O 'Connor said in a speech in 2001 to a group of women lawyers in Minnesota "the system may well be allowing some innocent defendants to be executed” (“Innocence”). It has been said that if capital punishment disappears in the United States it won’t be because voters and politicians no longer want to execute the guilty (Douthat 7). It will be because they 're afraid of executing the innocent (Douthat 7). "A government that cannot guarantee the absolute accuracy of its proceedings should not take to itself the power of taking a human life," said Senator Martin Looney, referring to the Tillman case (Williams 55-56). While interviewing certain people about this issue there was a statement made by a person that really caught my attention she said “...The death penalty should not be a closure to a family because another person is being killed, when God should be the one making that decision. Remember, two wrongs don’t make a…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty Cases

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The controversy surrounding the death penalty is an issue that has no end in sight. For the worst-of-the-worst, the people who have committed the most heinous crimes, some feel as though there is no better suited punishment than the most severe, death. However, the opposing side often brings up arguments the logic in punishing a murderer with murder, and how much justice could actually be achieved, or whether the initial wrong has faced at all justice through capital punishment. When talking about the death penalty, the infamous hardened criminals like Ted Bundy, or John Wayne Gacy come to mind for most people. Many people find the crimes punishable by death to be so atrocious that capital punishment is the only logical option, but what happens…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always room for a margin of error in any judicial case. Poor defendants are given less legal attention by their under-qualified attorneys because of the imperfection of the judicial system. It is very clear that when a defendant is given a court-appointed attorney they are not always served proper justice. Death penalty cases…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays