Preview

Summary Of The Maker's Eye: Revising Your Own Manuscripts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Maker's Eye: Revising Your Own Manuscripts
Donald M. Murray’s 1973 essay titled “The Maker’s Eye: Revising Your Own Manuscripts”, closely analyzes writers and their meticulous attention to detail present in all their works. He invites the reader into the world of an accomplished author and the mindset behind someone who has had a piece of their writing published for millions to see. The intended audience for this article is the aspiring student or author who’s interested in learning more about the world he may soon step into. Knowing this, Murray starts off the essay without any of the traditional expected fluff and instead brashly informs the reader of the difference between an expert author and one such as the reader. Murray states that students often complete their first draft
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Maker's Eye Murray
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Maker's Eye Murray

    “The Maker’s Eye” is an essay written by Donald Murray and was first published in October 1973 in a magazine called The Writer. Murray breaks down the differences in the thoughts and processes between professional and amateur writers. In this essay Murray informs readers about the importance and process of revising and rewriting because he believes that a piece of writing is never perfect in the eye of the writer. Murray talks about the “Maker’s eye” quite a bit in this essay.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Maker's Eye Analysis
    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Maker's Eye Analysis

    A coherent piece of writing requires a writer to proofread their drafts and adjust the content to emphasize their key themes and unify the paper. First published in October 1973, “The Maker’s Eye,” written by Donald Murray, describes the importance revising and archiving a writer’s manuscripts. Revising consists of a combination of self review and accepting criticism from your peers. Integrating peer’s revisions, negative or positive, enriches the piece and allows it to appeal to a larger group of people. When drafting, the writer needs to “read critically but constructively”, tailoring their writing to “cut what is bad, to reveal what is good”. The message must be delivered carefully, the “information must carry the reader toward meaning.”…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Don't Quit Your Day Job -- Book Review
    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Don't Quit Your Day Job -- Book Review

    The book is divided into short, well-organized chapters. Important subjects have their own bold headings and Denney often breaks chapters into numbered or bulleted lists, like “The Seven Habits of a Working Writer,” which makes it easy to understand the delineated concepts. These chapters follow a sort of chronology, starting with the decision to become a full-time writer and ending with a chapter on how a freelancer can keep working while coping with the difficulties that arise from the lifestyle. Each chapter is accompanied by anecdotes from Denney’s own publishing career, these being the most illuminating and enjoyable parts of the book. Denney also sprinkles in quotes from famous and not so famous, yet successful writers that serve to illustrate his points and inspire the reader.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    my papa's waltz
    • 1630 Words
    • 5 Pages

    my papa's waltz

    MacMahan, Elizabeth, Susan X. Day, and Robert Funk. Literature and the Writing Process. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2011. Print.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Albert Camus Speech
    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyzing Albert Camus Speech

    In Albert Camus’s speech, he announces his utmost appreciation and honor for the recognition of the Nobel Prize in literature. Camus shares that “[his]work is in progress” (par 1). As young as he is he reveals how he can often come high in doubts. To regain the main focus of the speech he expresses how art has been the source of his support. He then outlines the nobility of a writer’s craft and how it can reveal insightful truths about the world.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Explication – Marxist Analysis on Charles Dickens’s Bleak House
    • 992 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explication – Marxist Analysis on Charles Dickens’s Bleak House

    Benjamin, Walter. “The Author as Producer”. Twentieth-Century Literary Theory: A Reader. Ed. Newton. K. M. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1997.…

    • 992 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Introspection In The Works Of Ovid, Petrarch
    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Introspection In The Works Of Ovid, Petrarch

    While today many think of literary works as being closely associated with the author who wrote them, literary works were not always the product of the authors experiences and imagination. The first literary works came from an explanatory oral tradition and were then later written down as they had been heard and passed down through generations. Since the Renaissance one of the many reasons an author has for writing any given work is to express his or herself and explore who they are as a person. While an increase in free time, access to literature and education are often cited as the main causes of this we can actually see the beginnings of self introspection in writing as early back as the writings of Virgil and Ovid. As literature transitioned…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences In Woolf's How Should One Read A Book?
    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences In Woolf's How Should One Read A Book?

    Since each author’s focus lie elsewhere, finding common ground between specific points proves difficult. Still, their agreement might find itself when directing attention to their similar approaches to explaining their theories. In this sense, their agreement has more to deal with a similar decision to include certain relationships and distinctions. During their essays, both writers introduce different relationships between authors and readers. In Woolf’s “How Should One Read a Book?” section, presents an amicable relationship at the initial reading but it dwindles once a reader finish. Unlike Woolf, Ricoeur presents a separated relationship from the start, especially explaining how he tries to treat the “author as already dead” (Ricoeur, 107).…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stephen King's Writing Style
    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stephen King's Writing Style

    In order for an author's voice to shine through in their writing, they must develop their…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ransom And Foucault's Criticism, Inc.
    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ransom And Foucault's Criticism, Inc.

    A clear definition of an author and how the author relates to the text is an issue that elicits debate among scholars, philosophers and researchers. John Crowe Ransom and Michel Foucault are two well-known critics who attempt to offer explanations of who an author is. Using their texts Criticism, Inc. and What is an Author , this essay aims at highlighting how these critics define the concept of an author and how each enhances our understanding of it.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Glass Menegerie
    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Glass Menegerie

    Readers and Writers. Fourth Edition. Ed. John Schilb and John Clifford. Bedford/St. Martin’s: 2009. 343-392.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Writing Changing?
    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Is Writing Changing?

    Is writing changing..., writing is a living process, not dead like the Aztecs nor stagnant like a building. Writing is the process of weaving words together to form a complex or simple string of sentences that either tell a story or teach. The act of constructing such text is referred to as literature, man’s legacy. As a consequence of changes is the art of writing; as well as the mediums through which they or found and published, the way individuals read has changed. Now there’s the question of rather these changes have turned one of the greatest art forms into nothing more than a past time event, has the meaning of the words been lost, are reader no longer being enveloped by the stories they read?…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Art, Literature, and the Carriers of Civilization
    • 1279 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Art, Literature, and the Carriers of Civilization

    Prose, Francine. Reading like a Writer: A Guide for People Who Love Books and for Those Who Want to Write Them. New York: HarperCollins, 2006. Print.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Realism in the Writing Style of George Eliot
    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Realism in the Writing Style of George Eliot

    <br><li>Carlisle, Janice. "The Mirror In the Mill on the Floss; Toward Reading of Autobiography Discourse". Studies in the Literary Imagination. Vol 23:Issue 2. [EBSCO] Masterfile Premier 1990…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Scientific and Techhnical Writing
    • 12421 Words
    • 50 Pages

    Scientific and Techhnical Writing

    Results and Recommendations 7. Conclusions and Recommendations STEP4: ROUGH DRAFTING * Provides the writer with an overview of his work. It shows how his ideas are arranged and brought to life. It is almost like a diary wherein the writer pours out everything he thinks and feels will contribute to the development of his work without putting much emphasis on superficial errors such as misspellings and incorrect punctuation marks. STEP5: REVISING *…

    • 12421 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics