Preview

Summary Of The Perils Of Indifference

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
479 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of The Perils Of Indifference
The Perils of Indifference In this day in age several people fail to realize the true importance of taking a stand for what is right. Taking a stand is a topic that is often discussed yet rarely understood. Taking a stand means to be courageous enough to defend an issue that one strongly believes in. The benefits of standing up for what one may feel is right is that one can gain more confidence, learn from taking risks, but most importantly, one can make a difference in many people's lives.Weisel states that “In the place that I come from society was composed of three simple categories: the killers, the victims, and the bystanders.” (The Perils of Indifference, 67) According to Wiesel, he clarifies that although the bystanders did not kill …show more content…
A bystander is typically someone who avoids the issue or the victim being harmed. Weisel implies that “But this time, the world was not silent. This time, we do respond. This time, we intervene.” (The Perils of Indifference,104-106) Weisel portrays that it did not take one single person or group to form the Holocaust, even avoiding the victims contributed to it. No matter how difficult the situation or how different someone may be, it's important to at least attempt to stand up for others because the more risks one takes, the more confidence and courage they will gain but most importantly one can possibly make a massive impact on someone's life. Weisel claims that “Indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor- never it's victim, whose pain is magnified when he or she feels forgotten.” (The perils of Indifference, 62-63) Wiesel illustrates that when the victims are being ignored, they often feel worse because it would often seem like nobody cared that they were starving and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The fifth chapter, “Bystander Reactions,” compiles different perspectives from six different scholars on the role played by bystanders. Yisrael Gutman and Schmuel Krakowski focused mainly on the relationship between the Polish people and the Jewish people, and they make the claim that while some Polish people tried to help the Jewish armed resistance, many “tended…to regard the catastrophe of the Jews and Jewish appeals for assistance as something remote from their immediate concerns.” Gutman and Krakowski compiled a list of…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How does it support Wiesel's main ideas about indifference? I think he used it in a metaphorical way, since in that war he also saw people who were good, but it was not always an option for them to do the right thing. 6. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? When he speaks of his time in the camps hoping for rescue, Wiesel writes, "If they knew, we thought, surely those leaders would have moved heaven and earth to intervene.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ellie Wiesel expressed in his speech how bystanders should take action when they see injustice of any sorts and not keep quiet. ¨Who would allow such crimes….How could the world remain silent¨(Wiesel), he tells the reader how everyone knew that they were suffering that people were dying and yet they did nothing to help but instead ignored it. He stresses how people should have done something to help them instead of ignoring them. Even if they…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay Week 1 Com 220

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I chose to read the speech made by Elie Weisel about indifference around the world today and in the past. This speech was very touching in my opinion and I believed showed examples of Bias, Rhetorical devices, and argumentation. Elie Weisel was able to connect with his listener by sharing his heartbreaking and emotional experience. He then talked about other instances where injustice occurred around the world. Elie Weisel made good arguments as to why we we do and why we cannot ignore these injustices. We must stand up and fight against those who oppress. It is so easy to ignore something happening right next to you when it does not affect you. Live and let live, don't ask don't tell, what I cant see cant hurt me...All of these things we say to ourselves to feel better about not standing up against evil. Feel better about being selfish human beings. In this essay I will discuss the different Arguments made, how these arguments and counter arguments were addressed and how effective Elie Weisel’s speech was.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meanwhile, according to “Sudan Backgrounder,” “With the international community focused on resolving the conflicts between the north and the south, a growing conflict in Darfur was virtually ignored.” Evidently, the conflict in Darfur is ignored allowing the violence to grow in the area. The point Wiesel made is clearly supported by the events occurring in the world. Even after he delivers his speech, indifference continually grows. The indifference of the Sudan President causes chaos in Darfur---the attacks, the deaths, the danger existent in Darfur is because of the cruelty the president has.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The renowned memoir Night by Elie Wiesel takes place in Romania and Germany during World War II. This piece of literature depicts a portion of the author’s life at the peak of a global war. At this time in history, many people refused to take notice of what was transpiring in Nazi Germany. In Wiesel’s Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech he said, “Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere.” This declaration is relevant to what happened during the Holocaust in the way that several people neglected the slaying of the Jewish people. This statement by Wiesel is also appropriate to describe certain instances in society today.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allison Funk Mrs. Tinberg 4th Period 29 February 2024 The Perils of Indifference As you get locked into the Ghettos to be loaded on train cars for a long trip to Germany with occasional stops to get one or two buckets of food and water, a train filled bugs and things no one wants to be around, and finally what feels like a journey with no end you wait in boredom for a change. When they get there, unloading takes what feels like years and you often get by clubs. You look up and see a sign that reads, “arbeit ist freeze”. Work sets you free. They are in line, determined to see if they are fit to work or not.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nobel Peace Prize winner, renowned scholar, and author of over fifty books, Elie Wiesel is a name with worldwide recognition. In addition to his literary and scholarly accomplishments, Wiesel is also recognized as an eminent champion and defender of human rights for both the work he has done in the field, as well as his own status as a Holocaust survivor (“Elie Wiesel”). Wiesel believes indifference, or the lack of sympathy towards others, as being the devastating culprit in dividing humanity. In this rhetorical analysis of Wiesel’s speech “The Perils of Indifference” I will explain how Wiesel uses the concepts of ethos, logos, pathos, and other rhetorical devices to make this a powerful and timeless speech in hopes to eliminate…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wiesel is trying to teach us about the harm of silence as well as his experience with it. He said there are many things he will never forget but silence was always there. It could be the silent dark night or the silence of someone hiding a secret. He will be stuck with these memories and the haunting ideas of all that has happened. Silence can be deadly, yet silence always speaks louder than…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dangers of indifference come like an unexpected flood. Elie and Niemoller recognize the impact of silence and have experienced it themselves. For the poet, he chose to not speak out and as a consequence, no one was there to save him. He set himself up for destruction. Wiesel says, “ Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” because so many people did not speak up and it resulted in a mass murder. If people had not been silent, the Holocaust and many other genocides may have been avoided and innocent lives saved.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He clutches onto his father’s hand and naively denies that the world could stand by silently and allow the Germans to slaughter the Jews. However, within moments of his arrival at the camp, he witnesses the horrific reality that murders his childhood and innocence. Wiesel sees babies and children being thrown into fire pits and soon after states, “Never shall I forget the nocturnal silence that deprived me, for all eternity, of the desire to live” (Wiesel 43). At this point in time, the murders he witnesses disgust him. He is absolutely mortified. Throughout the novel, there are many other moments that Wiesel struggles with his moral views, and the longer he is in the camp, the more detached he becomes. For instance, after a man was shot down for falling behind in their forty-two mile run between camps, Wiesel states that, “I soon forgot him. I began to think of myself again” (92). Wiesel starts to become self-focused like most of the other prisoners. He lives in constant fear, and staying alive is the only thing he has the time or energy to worry about. Survival literally becomes his only goal. Unlike before, when he witnesses this murder, he keeps moving. Death was something that he was used to seeing. His self-preserving mentality is shown to a further extent when his father is killed. Oblivious to his surroundings, Wiesel’s father continuously calls out to him for water, but Wiesel ignores him. In the…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nearing the end of World War II, a young Wiesel, among many others, was rescued from the concentration camp in Auschwitz and was finally free from the grasp of the wicked Nazis. After his freedom, Wiesel did all he could through his literary works to let the world know of the horrors he experienced at the hands of the Nazis. He received a Nobel Peace prize for his messages to the world. In 1999, he gave a very prominent speech about oppressors and the indifference of Man, apathetic to the suffering of the holocaust victims.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equally important, Wiesel’s form of parallel structure and comparisons to deliver a well-balance phrase that pleases the audience so they can comprehend the concept of indifference in a different perspective. Furthermore, Wiesel declares his questioning towards the audience about the definition of indifference as well as adding several contradicting comparisons of how indifference initially affects society, “What is indifference? Etymologically, the word means "no difference." A strange and unnatural state in which the lines blur between light and darkness, dusk and dawn, crime and punishment, cruelty and compassion, good and evil” (2) In this case, this quote states how indifference can be viewed in society. Therefore, Wiesel arranges his…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If someone doesn't do anything about something, they observed it makes things worse for the people involved. For example, in "The Perils of Indifference" by Elie Wiesel, it says, "He understood those who needed help why didn't he allow his refugees to disembark." This shows that the way Franklin Delano Roosevelt didn't send help right away affected the prisoners of all the different concentrations camps created by the Nazis. When someone does not realize they need to do something about what is going on people suffer. Another example of this is in the article "The Perils of Indifference" where it says, "Why did some of America's largest corporations continue to do business with Hitler's Germany until 1942." Instead of boycotting Hitler so that he could not continue providing things to his concentration camps, large companies of that time…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wiesel does not understand the reasoning of suppling Hitler while World War II was going on. Ford, DuPont, GM, Standard Oil, Bank of America all had massive investments in Germany. None of them cared about slave labour or anything else. How could they accept the fact in some shape or form they are helping Hitler fight the war against America and also help kill the jews who are suffering. Back in the day people only cared about their own country and wealth, not others. America went along with doing business because they were greedy for money. Why stop making millions from Hitler when its not affecting you? That how I look at it from the…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays