FACTS: In 1995 William Brotby was hired by Computer Task Group, Inc. (CTG) as an information technologies consultant. Upon hiring, Brotby had to sign an agreement stating that he would be restricted to work for any CTG customers if he left the company. No more than two years later, Brotby left CTG and began to work for one of CTG’s customers known as Alyeska Pipeline Service Company. CTG, plaintiff, filed a suit against Brotby, defendant, in a federal district court alleging breach of contract. During the production of discovery, Brotby refused to fully respond to CTG’s interrogatories, never gave truthful answers, filed unwarranted motions, made flimsy objections, and never disclosed all of the information that CTG sought. Brotby was fined twice by the court and was issued five separate orders ordering him to cooperate. Because of Brothby’s continuous refusal to cooperate, CTG eventually filed a motion to enter default judgment against him in 1999. The court granted the motion; however, Brotby appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.…
The legal interventions which took place involved the intervention of the NSW Supreme Court in which they achieved an outcome for both parties.…
Additional legislation in 1914 was the Federal Trade Commission Act which created the Federal Trade Commission commonly known as the FTC. With a shared responsibility the FTC and the U.S. Department of Justice enforce the Sherman Act and Clayton Act. The FTC also examines unfair completive practices and methods issuing cease and desist orders.…
The case Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission was argued before the Supreme Court on March 24, 2009. Citizens United produced a political documentary that discussed whether Hillary Clinton would be a good president, however, the FEC stated that this was violating the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA). Although the film could have been shown in theaters, sold on DVDs, downloaded from the internet, and distributed in the form of a book, the producers could have faced five years in jail if they offered the documentary on Videos on Demand.…
The case was dismissed due to the state of New York not having a common-law claim for invasion of privacy. Also, the plaintiff’s claim for violation of civil rights law 50 and 51 was dismissed because the plaintiff’s name and likeness was not up for trade or being advertised. The claim for defamation was dismissed because the statement “flagrant opportunist” was the opinion of the defendant.…
The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 established the Federal Trade Commission, but it also provided further antitrust guidance. The FTC Act supports the Sherman Act and provides room for further prosecution of those who violate the Sherman Act. Additionally it “…also reaches other practices that harm competition, but that may not fit neatly into categories of conduct formally prohibited by the Sherman Act.” 2 The only cases brought under the FTC Act are done so by the…
An important law is the Federal Trade Commission Act. The sole function of such a law is safeguarding consumers’ rights through promotion of free, fair…
1. What is one aspect of Title VII that has been violated by the company?…
During the years 2009 thru 2015, Wells Fargo has had to participate and defended a plethora of legal issues that were filed against them or their subsidiaries. Throughout these years Wells Fargo was involved in a total of 28 different legal issues. Many of the lawsuits main contributor were Wachovia. These legal issues ranged from violations to bankruptcy laws, wrongful termination to contracts, documents containing untrue statements, targeting and steering minorities into high-cost mortgages, additional mortgage lawsuits, breach of contract with Visa/Master…
The paper that I was required to read was "Snaps to Riches" by Ellen Huet. She is a staff writer for Forbes magazine. The purpose of this article was to inform the audience reading to understand the uniqueness of this social media application called Snapchat. This article mainly focused on the growth of the application. Within the particular platform it has surpassed many in a very small amount of time. Snapchat has developed many careers by single handedly being a useful tool. Within this application communication between people happens, and stories go viral! I follow a famous snapchat celebrity on social media, by the name of Julieanna Goddard. She utilized snapchat to jumpstart her career as a party promoter and entrepreneur.…
The paper will serve as a historical background overview of how the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC) came into existence. The paper will also break down the key components for which the FTC covers, such as deceptive advertising, baiting and switching and consumer fraud. There will be examples of each of those issues at hand to demonstrate how it happened. The paper will include an argument within the Bait and Switch techniques where some claims have been made that it has been beneficial to consumers who got baited. The paper will also look into ways of determining if the claims are deceptive, fraudulent, and how to best act on such claims. Finally, the paper will provide a closing overview of the FTC as it is today, and what it has done for the consumers since its inception.…
In August 2007, the top categories of lead criminal charges resulting from FBI investigations were:[6]…
The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 (created by the 5 member Federal Trade Commission (FTC), has joint Federal accountability with the U.S. Justice Department for imposing/enforcing the antitrust laws. The FTC has the power to investigate, scrutinize any unfair competitive practices on its own initiative or by requests of wrongly affected firms. It has the…
Not only would Apple’s main policy of privacy be violated if they let the FBI hack into Farook’s phone, but it would have damaged the company and our rights all together. “Basic American rights were at stake, and the purpose of the law is to protect people’s rights” (“PRO/CON: Should Apple have resisted FBI pressure to hack an iPhone?” Newsela). Technically, Apple has a right to refuse the orders of the FBI that reflects their company in a negative way. If Apple would have accepted the order of the FBI, our rights as Americans would have been at risk. Moreover, not only would our rights as Americans be at risk, the entire company could have been damaged because of what the law was asking for. “The FBI did not ask Apple to turn over information…
In the case of Coca-Cola vs. Joya Williams for conspiring to steal trade secrets and then sell them to a competitor, Joya Williams showed that she was very unethical and lacked judgment in how she handled herself. The fact that she was in deep debt and was unhappy with her job should not have meant that she needed to steal from her employer so that she could get ahead. Many people are in the same boat that she was in but choose to do the more ethical approach and use better judgment which would be to not steal and if unhappy with their job, look for another one. This case was an open and shut case in regards to the law since she and her conspirators showed…