Preview

Summary Of Trouillot's Silencing The Past

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1258 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Trouillot's Silencing The Past
Power, the past, enemies, and victims all can be tied together in most accounts found throughout history. While we tend to live in the present and anticipate the future, it is important to understand the past in order to continue or studies of history. With the past comes stories of enemies, victims and different roles of power. By reading these documents we are given different insights and help with answering questions of how and why specific accounts took place. In the first chapter of Michel Rolph Trouillot’s Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History, Trouillot sets out to answer the question of how history is produced by laying a framework, arguing that in the writing of history, lots of things get lost and what is lost …show more content…
He is attempting to explain genocide through how it evolved from hatred. He believes there is no better example of this than the Weimar Republic, the Third Reich and the end result being the Holocaust. Specifically, he explores how the Germans who were murdering the jews feelt like they were acting in their own defense against potential victimizers. He argues that the elusive enemies, in the Germans case, were the jews, especially when the people they kill are not seen as individuals but as what they represent. In their quest for perfection, the urge to “cleanse” society of all abnormality, ultimately turned into destruction. We see that these encounters between the victims and the perpetrators is what facilitates genocide. This process of persecution and segregation should be clarified rather than accepted as natural. Whenever keeping victims and killers strictly apart it creates a blurred vision of the fact that one side does something to the other in an encounter of physical, mental, and imaginary. Bartov mentions that the mass slaughter of Jews was acknowledged but with discomfort and humiliation. The resulting tendencies from blurring the two, left the holocaust survivors just as defenseless against their memory and mental devastation as they were against the Nazis. He writes “The ubiquity of perpetrators and victims, and the frequent confusion between them, is at the core of the destructive energy characteristic of modern genocide, taking place as it does within an imaginary universe that encompasses every single individual in a cycle of devastation and murder”(786) For the jews while in the camps, action was impossible and those who survived were unable to act against the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    History is always about perceptions. Therefore there are generally two sides of history: the “winner´s” and the “loser´s” side. As history is normally written down by the winners, which is called grand narrative, only few people know which experiences the losers, or…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The feelings of anxiety, deception and suspense are three of the many words used to describe the Holocaust. Source B revealed how genocide was demonstrated in the Holocaust by providing evidence of classification and preparation. Likewise, Source C, a poem written by Pastor Neimoller, in which he describes the fear that the people felt when groups of Jews were disappearing each day. The day they came for them there was no one left to take a stand for the minority. In a similar way Source D, “The Terrible Things” by Eve Bunting, delivers a similar explanation by a group called “The Terrible Things” that caught groups of animals living in the forest one by one. Although when they came for the rabbits there were no other animals left to stand up for them. Exposing to us how in a similar way the Nazi’s would diminish the Jews rights though they had done nothing and no one said nor did a thing to prevent it. Therefore, the segregation of the Jewish people, also known as the Holocaust, is identified as the responsibility of the people.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Holocaust was certainly one of humanity’s darkest hours. The Nazi leaders of Germany rounded up millions of Jews from across Europe and place them in camps to be exterminated or for hard labor. These actions were caused by the Nazis’ belief that all of the Jews were responsible for corruption and injustice in the continent. They labeled all of them in this fashion and sought to get rid of them as a group. Part of this mentality was characterized by depriving the Jews of their individuality. This is reflected in “This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen.” The workers of the death…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald L. Niewyk’s fifth and sixth chapters both deal more with outside perspectives and outside reactions than it does with those who were persecuted. The fifth chapter, “Bystander Reactions,” offers four different arguments as to why bystanders acted they way they did during the Holocaust. The sixth chapter, “Possibilities of Rescue,” discusses three different viewpoints on what foreign governments could have done to prevent the Holocaust. These two chapters conclude Niewyk’s book The Holocaust and wrap up the final sequence of events surrounding the Holocaust and the camps.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The author felt that it was his obligation, to let the world know how and why the Holocaust occurred, he wanted to speak out and let everyone know how they could treat someone else in such an inhuman way, where they are nothing but unmenschen, just because they’re different. He was later on diagnosed with throat cancer, and due to the fear of losing his voice, he wrote this book to pass on his experience as a survivor of the German Holocaust.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elie Wiesel's Night

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He shares his thoughts, and his reflections looking back on the terrible events he endured. He didn’t just show his hatred for the Nazis, he showed all the emotions he encountered, which were not always negative. For example near the end of the book, right after his release, because he had strived so much to survive he had regressed to animal instincts; he says “Our first act as free men was to throw ourselves onto the provisions. We thought only of that. Not of revenge, not of our families. Nothing but bread.” (119). He shows how complex his thoughts about everything going on around him were, there was not one clear direction. In the dire situations Jews during the Holocaust were put through they all had mixed feelings, they had been so abused mentally and physically they could not and did not want to even contemplate what the Nazis had done to…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He asks how the people could not have acted against the holocaust when they knew it was happening. “If they knew, we thought, surely those leaders would have moved heaven and earth to intervene. They would have spoken out with great outrage and conviction. They would have spoken out with great outrage and conviction. They would have bombed the railways leading to Birkenau, just the railways, just once”(445).…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since March of 2011, more than 400,000 lives have been terminated and more than 11 million have been displaced because of the war in Syria. Genocides is the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation. This connects to the Holocaust because both are considered mass genocides. Night is a memoir of Elie Wiesel’s horrific experiences in the holocaust. He explains thoroughly in great detail on how the violence he witnessed, or endured, impacted him heavily. Violence, in the memoir, effects Elie and his father, Shlomo, by making them question their faith and improving their relationship.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Niewyk’s third and fourth chapters presents the different arguments scholars have when discussing both the victims’ life during the Holocaust and the Jewish resistance. Within the third chapter “The Victims’ Experiences,” Niewyk introduces Bruno Bettelheim, Terrence Des Pres, Primo Levi, and Zoë Vania Waxman, intellectuals who “give us a sense of the variety of what were…many millions of Holocaust experiences.” Within the fourth chapter “The Problem of Jewish Resistance,” Niewyk compiles the arguments of Raul Hilberg, Yehuda Bauer, and Dan Diner, all of whom discuss why they believe the Jewish people “yielded to their fate with minimal resistance.” Bruno Bettelheim’s argument revolves around how the prisoners themselves changed.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mass Killing Summary

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Shaw argues that studies on genocide have concentrated too heavily on the specific perpetrators and victims with regard to intentions and identities respectively. Instead, he wants to propose that the crime of genocide should be understood within the structure of conflict situations. The most important aspect of genocide studies from the point of view of politics is that the concept of genocide must be clarified, Shaw believes that scholarship should provide this elucidation. By returning to the original definition proposed by Lemkin, the focus is more generally on attacks by the armed against the unarmed. Shaw states that “Lemkin invented ‘genocide’ because he wanted to describe – and highlight for countervailing action – a general class of violent actions.” Taking lessons from one of the most influential studies on war by Carl von Clausewitz, Shaw sees genocide as a form of war directed against civilians. Debates about genocide have certainly advanced since the introduction of the term, yet, Shaw feels these debates from the 1940s onwards have lost two very key aspects of the original concept. In agreement with Lemkin the omission of cultural genocide or social destruction meaning not just physically but a way of life and how genocide relates to war are vital in understanding the nature of the crime. He argues that “Genocide always involves physical violence but it involves many other things as well. Defining genocide by killing misses the social aims that lie behind it. Genocide involves mass killing but it is much more than mass killing.” Similar to some of the arguments made by Claudia Card in relation to the inclusion of cultural genocide, Shaw’s assertion that genocide must be viewed in the context of war provides a valuable framework for understanding the particular violence against civilians. The use of word civilians here is important for Shaw, rather than the UN Genocide…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bystander The Holocaust

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Furthermore, the roles that bystanders, witnesses, and observers played in these circumstances are an important factor for the Jewish executions. The bystanders in Father DuBois’s book can be separated into three categories: those who witness the murders, those who were requisitioned, and those who helped Jews (either to escape, save the living who got out of the pits or hid Jews in their homes), along with the roles of each case. People think when there is a genocide that the only people who are responsible for the deaths of the victims are the bad guys or murderers. However, this is not always the…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trouillot notes that the pursuit of investigating the true nature of history has driven historians through a division between historical process and historical knowledge. Trouillot argues that history is not to be divided in such a manner, but rather the focus should be driven to understand how history works. Trouillot asserts that history reveals itself through the “production of specific narratives”. Consequently, rather than focusing on the how or why something occurred, historians should focus on answering how or why a specific narrative was created. Trouillot believes that through this process of analysis, one can gather an understanding of the multiple perceptions and why other perspectives prevail.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (3) When speaking about power Trouillot explains, “History is a story about power, a story about those who won.” (5) Trouillot is saying…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History defines the way we see and understand the modern world. It is the template for many decisions and, while it is defined as the study of the past, helps shape current affairs that will change the course of the future. But history can also be dangerous, when it is manipulated, reinvented, or erased, often for political gain — collectively termed ‘historical negationism’ by the French historian Henry Rousso. History can become a weapon, as is seen in the past and the present, from the Nazis to North Korea.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Purpose Of History

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Only by studying history with the intent of exploring it for its own sake can one obtain the most pure and unbiased view of what has previously occurred. Such historical knowledge will be useful in a variety of matters, and will present is beholder with a broader view of matters that it is applied…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics