Summary Of We The People By Jane Butler

While it cannot be for certain how Butler would reply to my argument, her book offers a clear insight into what she might have said. In response to my argument on precarity, I believe Butler would use the principles of “we the people”. She states that that even when all people are recognized, there are those who still don’t acknowledged. In fact, these disregarded groups of people are stripped of their rights to assemble and fall side to larger bodies of people. I think she would argue that even though people have the ability to gather and protest, their opinions would still be ignored. “We the people” is supposed to encompass all people of all backgrounds and Butler believes that precarity greatly restricts one’s right and ability to appear in public. For my second argument on cohabitation, I believe Butler would argue that oppressors, like the richest one percent of the population as stated earlier, know that they have an obligation and should stand up for the exploited, but choose to ignore it. Butler believes it is the ethical duty to help people in distress. I also believe Butler would argue that locatedness plays a large role. Exposure to oppression shows the issues that need to be resolved, but if
As previously stated, biopolitics are what organizes life through governmental and nongovernmental means. According to Butler, the value of one’s life can be judged through this organization and determine the difference between living and surviving. Biopolitics and the government create what Butler states is injustice that leads to human suffering. I believe Butler would agree that being surrounded by loving family and friends is an important aspect of life, but precarity takes priority. Unless one is fighting for the equality of themselves and others like them, Butler believes there is no possibility to live a good life in