Preview

Summary Of Why The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted By Malcolm Gladwell

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
968 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Why The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted By Malcolm Gladwell
Hassan Samhat
English 203
Rima Rantisi
16 -10-2014
Igniting the Fuse of Revolutions
There is no doubt in mind that we as people are more connected than anytime before. In fact the bonds that bring us together have been closer as new forms of digital applications work their way into every aspect of our daily life. If you doubt that social networking has changed the world, take a look at the Middle East. Social media, particularly Facebook and Twitter, have played an effective role in provoking, accelerating and organizing some of the insurrections and revolutions that have been occurring. These tools have been efficient in galvanizing the young and aiding them in their movements against restrictive authorities and their quandary for more democracy,
…show more content…
He started working for the Washington post in 1987 and then transferred to the New Yorker in 1996. “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted” was published in the New Yorker on October 4, 2010.In the text , Malcolm Gladwell starts off a discussion about social change requirements. He particularly supports the argument that social media can’t provide what social change has always required. Gladwell believes that the exuberance of the social media is “outsized”. He then differentiates between Facebook online activism and radical activism using series of counterarguments. Moreover, he affirms that social movements that are powerful enough to enforce change on powerful social forces necessitate both well-set ties among participants and hierarchical organizations; elements not present through organizations relying on social …show more content…
To support his convictions, Gladwell claims that weak ties and ambiguous equality introduced by social networking websites wouldn’t be enough to raise an effective protest, and tried throughout the text to convince the reader with his view toward effective revolutions and social media. His text is reliable and credible because of specific settings of events ‘They would all have remembered the murder of Emmett Till in 1955, the Montgomery bus boycott that same year, and the showdown in Little Rock in 1957.’(14)
The 2011 Arab Spring rebellions made big use of social media activism within the countries of Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. These nations concentrated on the society’s ability to operate social media technologies and begin organizing essential foundation initiative for a globalized form of democracy. Arab youth population is described as budding societies using social media to blame out the repressive sides of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The central premise of both Malcolm Gladwell’s article “Small Change: Why The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” and Zizi Papacharissi’s book Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics is to discuss the ways in which social media platforms such as Twitter can serve as communication tools that foster action for various causes. In his article, Gladwell notes that some scholars believe that the internet and social media platforms enable an upgraded and new model of activism due to the “ease” and speed” of mobilizing causes through such outlets (Gladwell, pp. 8-9). However, Gladwell rejects such a simple assertion and, instead, argues that although these platforms can help mobilize particular movements, they alone are not enough to maintain…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his piece, Small Change, Malcolm Gladwell documents the importance of the change in activism from the 1960s to present. Specifically how today, activism is seen electronically, as people use the media to write protests to the oppressor instead of how in the 1960s activism was seen in sit-ins. Overall, Gladwell asserts that social media is not the best way to start a movement as it does not motivate people as much as a sit-in does. I cannot help but side with Gladwell as he has a good point in saying that social media does not bring the same results as a sit-in. I, as a social media user that has participated in online protests such as signing petitions, can confirm Gladwell’s assertions as I can write a reason why things should be better,…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Kassim, S. (2013). Twitter Revolution: How the Arab Spring Was Helped By Social Media . Retrieved from policymic.com: http://www.policymic.com/articles/10642/twitter-revolution-how-the-arab-spring-was-helped-by-social-media…

    • 3234 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Small Change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted” Malcolm Gladwell argues that the new reinvented social activism is inferior to the activism used in the pre-internet age. Gladwell claims in the past people used ‘high-risk’ and strategic activism; qualities that activism nowadays don’t possess. I believe Gladwell undermines the power of the internet. Gladwell makes it seem as though only pre-internet activism could make impactful changes in the world. She claims the power of the internet is only used for insignificant purposes, such as finding someone’s phone.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm Gladwell wrote the article “Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted” to inform the world about networks such as Twitter or Facebook and their uses. Gladwell starts off by explaining how networks worked before these websites were created. He talks about how civil rights movements circulated through the country in a short period of time without the use of social networking. Then Gladwell explains the facts of why these social networks will not work in large networking situations.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She used the hashtags ‘#Concernedstudent1950’ and ‘#BlackLivesMatter’ as examples, both for the black minority facing discrimination needing a voice to call attention to what was happening. These hashtags’ causes became widely debated throughout the country, proving how effectively it had influenced people. She argues that the underrepresented minority is given an online voice via Twitter, which translates into action that affects people. However, unless it becomes ‘trending’, the argument loses effectivity and gets lost in the sea of other ‘voices’.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Granovetter has observed that, “our acquaintances- not our friends- are out greatest source of new ideas and information. The internet lets us exploit the power of these kinds of distant connections with marvelous efficiency… but weak ties seldom lead to high risk activism”…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facebookers are engaged in the sense of a sacrifice made for social change. He refers to…

    • 350 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    changed the human history, and some ideas are described very well with a good overall…

    • 514 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many are saying that social media is the new platform for large-scale change. Campaigns are turning towards social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, to gain support for their causes. Not only are companies and larger organizations using social networking sites (SNS) to promote change, but also everyday citizens are sharing their personal stories to motivate people to take action. But, is social media actually a strong platform for activism? Author Malcolm Gladwell, doesn’t think so. In Gladwell’s paper Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted, he argues that social media does not result in large-scale change. Instead of promoting change social media promotes participation (Gladwell, 2015). Many other writers agree,…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Basiccomp

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Today, new generations have adapted to a lifestyle where we invest the majority of our time in technology. Technology has allowed social medias such as MySpace, Facebook, and Twitter to control who our friends are. Malcolm Gladwell highlights whether or not these friendships are truly genuine, or inauthentic ones just kept over social media. In his essay, “Small Changes: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted”, Gladwell distinguishes between these two types of friendships as either “strong ties” or “weak ties”. He defines weak ties as a group of friends that we keep over social media, but don’t really exist in real life. Although weak ties come off as a negative thing, Gladwell sees strength in weak ties. Sherry Turkle, the author of the essay “Alone Together”, would disagree with Gladwell’s views on friendships kept through social media. Turkle believes very strongly in authentic relationships, and she therefore does not see technology as something that will benefit us. Turkle believes that technology makes us unable to hold authentic relationships. Personally, I disagree with Gladwell and agree with Turkle. Technology and social media have made us loose focus on who our real friends are, and people will continue down this path of inauthenticity until fake relationships, or weak ties, are all that we have left. New generations have begun to invest all of their time in the friends that they make over social media, leaving little to no time for their real friends. Weak ties, in the long run, will completely take over the time we invest in our strong ties, thus diminishing authentic relationships.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the past generation, the younger current generation has difficulty forming “authentic relationships” due to the fact that technology is inhibiting their social skills. Each generation has a different view of technology because of the fact that the current generation grew up with technology, while the previous generation did not. In Malcolm Gladwell’s “Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted,” the author speaks of the fact that technology is beneficial, but he also sees how it is demolishing the current generation's ability to communicate as the older generation did. Because Gladwell had grown up without technology, he only sees the corruption of it. Like Gladwell, Sherry Turkle’s “Alone Together,” brings…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lower drinking to age 18

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rashwan’s subject is how the internet social networks impact the Egyptian Revolution. His purpose is to inform us of how technology is the greatest democracy.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm Gladwell’s article "Small Change: Why the Revolution Will not be Tweeted" raises many questions about the potential contributions web-based social networking has attributed to the emergence of progressive social movement and change. "The revolution will not be tweeted" is reflective of his view that social media has no useful application in serious activism, which is a bold assertion, given the impact that social media has on today’s society. Gladwell believes that effective social movements powerful enough to impose change on longstanding societal forces will require both strong ties among all involved parties and the presence of the hierarchical organizations. In contrast, Gladwell characterizes the social networks as an interwoven…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Media consumption has seen many substantial changes in the last one-decade or so. With the proliferation of mobile devices and Internet to various parts of the world, more and more people are catching up with the digital media everyday. The digital media has changed the way media operates in more than one ways. First, the media has become much more fragmented and the audience’s average attention span has dropped to a much lesser amount. The number of alternates for sourcing information is so high that it is up to the consumer to keep the information he or she perceives as relevant and credible and debunk the rest. Secondly, increasing digital media channels give audience a platform to be broadcasters as well. Every blogger, every person on social media is a source of communication too and hence the media houses are not the only sources of information anymore. Thirdly, with the markets becoming more and more competitive, companies are consistently trying harder to communicate their messages to the audiences and digital is proving to provide a much larger ROI than any of the traditional channels of communication. For this reason, all forms of media are now being integrated into digital space slowly. We have seen this trend for newspapers as well as television and this trend is likely to become more prominent in future. In this digital space there is bound to be a tussle between the conventional media houses, the epicenters of information outflow and the media audience who have more power than ever before. This paper will throw light on the current trend of increasing active audiences in the digital domain and its effect on the power shift from the broadcaster to the audience.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays