Preview

Summary Paper on The Perils of Obedience by Stanley Milgram Response to his writing Christina Mahoney

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1102 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Paper on The Perils of Obedience by Stanley Milgram Response to his writing Christina Mahoney
In Stanley Milgram's, The Perils of Obedience, Milgram states "obedience is as basic an element in the structure of social life as one can point to."(1) Milgram then shows how submission to that authority goes back as far as Abraham. He makes us look into ourselves and see why we obey these commands against our better judgment.

Milgram then goes into detail about the experiment he set up at Yale University to test how much pain a person would inflict on another person just because they were ordered to do so. He explains the details of this experiment by setting the scene. They brought in 2 people one to be the "teacher" and one to be the "learner"(3) The learner is then strapped to an electric chair while the teacher asks questions. For each wrong answer the learner gets an electric shock, which progressively grows stronger.

The outcome of this experiment shocked Milgram since he had spoken to many people about this subject and they deduced that most people would not go beyond 150 volts. This experiment showed that the majority of people would shock the learner all the way into the danger zone, which was marked on their board with XXX representing 450 volts.

There were many different reactions from the participants in this experiment. Some questioned whether they should continue to issue the shocks, while others simply shocked all the way thru occasionally acting nervous or upset. One subject in particular stated; "what appalled me was that I could possess this capacity for obedience and compliance to a central idea..."(91)

Milgram's Experiments showed another interesting fact, when left to decide how much of a shock to administer to the learner, the teacher usually chose a painless level. There were very few occasions in which the teacher chose to shock at a high level we can assume by this that "they come from the sadistic fringe of society."(96) The experiments also showed that while some people protested they still obeyed orders and issued the shocks. But

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I will say what shocked me the most after reading “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram is that subject were “teachers” were never treated, punished, they were not getting a prize etc. yet they were more than willing to administer the shock to the “learner” just to get the approval of the experimenter. I would have done exactly as Gretchen Brandt, a thirty-one-year-old…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the experiment, the subject is told by the experimenter to give shocks from a scale of low to dangerously high to the person in the electric chair (who was an actor) when they give a wrong answer. The shocks were not real, but prior to the experiment, the subjects were given a small shock to influence them that the shocks in the experiment were true. After the experiment, Milgram assesses that “between the command and the outcome, there is a paramount force, which is the subject’s capacity for choosing their own behaviour” (p. 851). Although there were people who acted in immoral ways and increased the shock levels, there were also those who chose to renounce the unjust commands of authority, “providing affirmation of human morals and ideals” (p. 851). Therefore, people do have a choice in refusing to abide by authority’s rules and demands, but they choose not to because they do not want to suffer the…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s results were shocking to say the least (no pun intended). Why would average, everyday people agree to administer extreme electric shock to an innocent middle-aged man? Were the participants sadists (people who enjoy giving others pain)? Did Milgram manage somehow to recruit only “crazy participants”?…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The experiment would require a “teacher” and a “learner.” (Nevid & Rathus, P. 244). The tests showed that if the learner made an error; a very painful shock would be transferred to their body from the teacher. The learners obviously did not like the experiment showing signs of pain and discomfort. Most of the teachers would take delight in the suffering of the learners and would continue the experiment knowing the pain and torment the learner would go through.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a teacher and scientist at Yale and Harvard universities, started a study that tested the obedience and morals of humans everywhere. In simple terms, the experiment's main point was to "test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply becase he was ordered to by an experimental scientist" (Milgram 317). Two subjects would enter the warehouse that the experiment was being held in, and they would be labeled either the "learner" or the "teacher". The subject that is named the "learner" is placed in a small room and hooked up to a type of electric chair. What he is told he must do, is to recite the second word of a word pair that is read by the "teacher." Whenever an error is made, and the "learner" says the wrong word, he gets "electric shocks of increasing intensity" (Milgram 318). The twist in this experiment is that the focus was not really on the "learner", but all on the "teacher". The "teacher" would be placed at a small desk with a "shock generator" (Milgram 318), that…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Begin with deception-note it is one of the most prominent and highly debated ethical issues from Milgram’s study. Present argument against Milgram’s use of deception in his study: put participants under a lot of distress, believing they were harming another individual. Then present counter-argument: experiment would not have been effective if teachers new of the confederation between experimenter and learner, the experiment would not have worked, participants were debriefed afterwards.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One, the extreme tension induced in some individuals was unexpected. For example, Milgram explains that before conducting the experiment, procedures were discussed with many colleagues and none anticipated the reactions that later took place. He goes on to state that foreknowledge can never be the result of the invariable addition to the examinational investigation and understanding grows out of examining situations in which the end is unknown. Moreover, prior to the experiment there was every reason to believe that the subjects would indeed refuse to follow the experimenter’s instructions beyond the point where the victim protested. Again many colleagues and psychiatrists were questioned on this point, and they all virtually felt this would be the case as…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The procedure was performed by participant being paired with another person then find out who would be the learner and who would be the teacher. The draw was fixed so that the participant was always be the teacher, and the learner was one of Milgram’s confederates pretending to be a real participant. Milgram developed a shock generator with shock levels starting at 30 volts and increasing in 15-volt increments all the way up to 450 volts. The many switches were labeled with terms including "slight shock," "moderate shock" and "danger: severe shock", the final two switches were labeled simply with an ominous "XXX."(Milgram373). If the participant showed any hesitation doubt, the experimenter would respond with 4 prods including; “please continue”, “the experiment requires you to continue”, “it is absolutely essential that you continue”, and” you have no other choice but to continue” (Milgram 374).…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Ordinary people, under the direction of an authority figure, would obey just about any order they were given, even to torture” (The Atlantic, Rethinking One of Psychology's Most Infamous Experiments). Stanley Milgram ran an experiment at yale that tested one's willingness to follow orders from an . This experiment is more commonly known as the Milgram Experiment. Stanley Milgram randomly selected people who responded to the advertisement in the newspaper. Stanley had subject one in a room with him, and had another subject two sit in a room, that was not seen by subject one. Stanley Milgram ordered subject one to administer electric shocks to subject two, that would cause pain but not kill subject two. In reality subject two was not feeling…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Authority would not be able to exist without obedience. There is a scarcely discernible difference between taking after indiscriminately and unreasonable refusal to comply with those in a significant position of specialist. Submission to expert is a genuine and effective constrain that ought to be comprehended and regarded so as to deal with every circumstance in the most ideal way. Stanley Milgram’s experiment is one of the most important experiments ever administrated. The goal of the Milgram’s experiment was to find the desire of the participants to shock a learner in a controlled situation.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stanley Milgram carried out one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology. He was a psychologist at Yale University, conducting an experiment that focused on the conflict between obedience and morality. It showed that people have a strong tendency to obey with authority figures. Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an order even if it involved harming another individual. He was fascinated on how easily ordinary people could be influenced in committing evil.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Under certain circumstances ordinary individuals, with no prior sadistic or violent history, can be pressured and convinced into harming others. These circumstances arise when the individuals committing the harmful acts are forced into believing that they are not going to be held accountable for any of the acts committed. Milgram’s experiment on Obedience and Conformity demonstrates this idea. Milgram’s experiment involved a researcher dressed in a lab coat, who instructed a subject referred to as the teacher to teach a pair of words to the subject known as the learner. Under instructions given by the researcher, the teacher was to administer an electric shock to the learner, whenever the answer he/ she gave was inaccurate. The severities of the shocks administered were to increase with each wrong answer given by the learner. Milgram found that majority of the participants administered the highest level of the shock, despite the agonizing pleas and…

    • 1284 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    conformity thesis

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Participant took role of ‘teacher’ believing he/she administered various levels of shock to ‘student’. Student was confederate, pretending to be shocked…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays