Preview

Summary: The Compromise Of Henry Clay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1066 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: The Compromise Of Henry Clay
slave state, while also adding Maine to the nation as a free state to maintain balance. However, this compromise also states that any state north of the Mason-Dixon line, “contemplated by this act, slavery and involuntary servitude, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes, whereof the parties shall have been duly convicted, shall be, and is hereby, forever prohibited.” It effectively divided the country by geography, and it indirectly splits people into a demographic. The Compromise of 1850 eventually overturned the Missouri Compromise, when Texas applies for statehood after the Mexican-American War. Henry Clay, also known as “The Great Compromiser” allowed Texas to be declared a slave state, by writing this. To balance out the addition of a slave state to …show more content…
James Henry Hammond, a passionate supporter of slavery, delivered a speech about the importance of cotton to the economy. This speech, named “Cotton is King” discussed the indistinguishable divide between the Northern industry, and Southern plantations. The Southern plantations produced cotton that the industrial North later spun, sewed, and stitched before exporting to trade partners. At the time that this speech was delivered, the United States consumed cotton at an alarming rate, so the South attempted to use this argument to justify their ownership of slaves. However, the North had twice the amount of economic prosperity in population, commodity output, farm acreage, factories, and railroad mileage. The North’s economic stability shows that it didn’t rely on the South, debunking the myth claimed in “Cotton is King” and falsifying another argument in favor of slavery. The failure of the Constitution to mention slavery, or slavery in relation to the economy, allowed the South to argue the use of slavery because of its positive benefit to the national

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Slavery formed the backbone of the South economically. It was just as much the political and social basis of Southern identity, too. With the invention of Eli Whitney’s cotton gin, southern plantation owners had to buy more slaves to keep up with the demand for cotton. There was an ever-present demand, particularly by Northern states, for cotton. There became a growing economic dependence on slavery. James Henry Hammond’s manual, Instructions to His Overseer (c. 1840-1850), was designed for use on his large South Carolina estate. He was a strong supporter of slavery and the originator of the famous line, “Cotton is king.”…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As historian Edward Baptist uncovers in The Half Has Never Been Told, the extension of slavery in the initial eight decades after American independence drove the advancement and modernization of the United States. In the range of a solitary lifetime, the South developed from a thin seaside segment of exhausted tobacco manors to a mainland cotton domain, and the United States developed into an industrial, modern, and capitalist economy. Until the Civil War,…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South's predominant economic principle before the War of Northern Aggression was "Cotton is King." The South, as it was known around the turn of the 19th century, was solely dependent upon its cotton production. Low prices, unmarketable goods, and over-used land were driving the necessity for slavery and the need for cotton production out. Were it not for a Yankee's ingenuity, the South as we study it now may have been vastly different.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The North predominantly relied on trade and mercantilist profit making, whereas the South depended on labor-intense plantation industries that mostly required use of slavery. As the borderline states became the hotbed of slavery debate, the North and the South attempted to reach consent by Missouri Compromise, which is quintessential evidence that depicts the conflict on the practice of slavery. After Missouri was denied from joining the union because of its headstrong persistence on keeping slavery, the North and the South were able to reach a compromise that first accepted Maine to the union as a free state and then accepting Missouri as a slave state. The compromise not only ended up with a geographical line of 33'30'' that dissected the union but also signified the intensifying sectionalism ((F)). Even if Missouri Compromise was able to bring forth a temporary loosening of tension, it was rather an evanescent remedy of sectionalism that only foreshadowed the worsening conflict between the two parts of the…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political party system in the United States that existed from 1828-1854, after the first party system.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the United states acquired new land, there was not a precedent set regarding how the issue of slavery would be handled in these vast new territories. The map explains how much land was acquired and the spread of slavery throughout the years of 1790 to 1860. The Missouri compromise admitting Missouri into the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, but also stating slavery would be prohibited anywhere north of the southern boundary of Missouri in the future. The Missouri compromise had initially handled the status of slavery before 1846, from the procurement of the Louisiana purchase, which was the first large purchase of land. The question of western expansion of slavery into these new territories was now the beginning of what started the era of the civil war and the great divide of the American people.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was the resolution to the conflict involving those for slavery (the South) against those opposed to slavery (the North). Antagonism between the North and the South began to emerge in 1820 when Missouri applied to the United States as a slave state. At the time, in 1819, the United States had exactly eleven slave states and exactly eleven free states; by allowing Missouri into the nation, that balance would be disrupted and the Senate would be spiked towards the South. Missouri was admitted into the nation, however, the House approved an amendment outlawing any imported slaves from Africa to Missouri and set the children of slaves free. Ultimately the Senate rejected the amendment forcing Missouri out of the nation.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise, (1820), in U.S. history, measure worked out between the North and the South and passed by the U.S. Congress that allowed for admission of Missouri as the 24th state (1821). It marked the beginning of the prolonged sectional conflict over the extension of slavery that led to the American Civil War.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1819, Missouri requested to become a slave state. This would upset the balance of pro-slavery/anti-slavery states. Henry Clay Missouri Compromise Admitted Missouri as a slave state, and Maine as a free state, so as to maintain the balance.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution of California outraged many southerners because the constitution banned the slavery. Henry Clay worked to make a compromise that would both satisfy the South and the North. With the support of Daniel Webster, a powerful senator of Massachusetts, Henry Clay presented to the Senate a series of resolutions later called The Compromise of 1850. In order to appease North, the compromise regulated that California be admitted to the Union as a free state. To please the South, the compromise proposed a new and more effective fugitive slave law. To appease both sides, there was a provision allowed the right to vote for or against slavery called popular sovereignty. Even though Henry Clay put great effort on the compromise, the…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It allowed Missouri to be added as a slave state while Maine was established as a free state to maintain balance amongst the Union. This compromise was later negated by the Kansas-Nebraska Act put in place in 1854. According to Eric Foner, he states, “During the next two years, the Whig Party, unable to develop a unified response to the political crisis, collapsed. From a region divided between the two parties, the South became solidly Democratic... disgruntled Democrats, joined a new organization, the Republican Party, dedicated to preventing the further expansion of slavery” (Foner 512). Passed in 1854 The Kansas-Nebraska Act created a more sectional America because settlers could not determine the status of slavery among these territories by themselves. This led to events like Bleeding Kansas which was caused because when it came time to use their popular sovereignty to vote on whether to outlaw slavery or not people from other the states, like Missouri, would cross over the border and cast votes which led to elections being invalidated and having to be done over again on other days. Bleeding Kansas also led to many acts of violence that held political anti-slavery sentiments. However, the actual act itself states that it will leave the states “...created into a temporary government by the name of the Territory Nebraska; and... shall be received into the Union with or without slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the time of the admission…" (The Kansas- Nebraska Act). The act had went against the Missouri Compromise because Stephen A. Douglas passed this bill to give territorial governments to Kansas and Nebraska which had allowed them to use popular sovereignty to make their decisions. This negates the Missouri Compromise because it disrupted the balance of admitting every other state as a free state. Also, it…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Clay was born in Hanover County Virginia on April 12, 1777. He attended public schools and he later became the apprentice of a respected lawyer in Richmond, Virginia named George Wythe. After Clay was admitted to the bar in 1797 (at the age of twenty) he moved to Lexington, Kentucky where he opened his own law practice. He quickly made a name for himself with his brilliance in and out of the court room. He did not stay at his law practice long before he moved to politics. Clay was an American Statesman who severed in both the House of Representatives and Senate. He also made five failed bids at the US Presidency. Although he never became president he had a profound effect on our country. He applied himself to many different issues such…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Slaves welcome here, slave not wanted there. Man, it's a tough one trying to achieve what is best. How can everyone be happy if a solution cannot be reach here in Missouri? Across this whole world, there are those states that perhaps love working these black folks night and day. This is not right. I must find a solution to all this! Something must be done, who knows what will people want in the new vast territory we have just acquired. Will the territory allow slavery, or shall it be declared free? Ah yes, perhaps the inhabitants should be allowed to choose for themselves. Yes, this Missouri Compromise can achieve all that is well. I shall present this to Congress, and I hope this will get their support. I believe everyone is equal in one way or another. Now with my fellow Congress members, we must wait to see what happens. It has now been about 8 months, and we finally heard word. We are happy to inform that a solution has been met. We have equaled the power between the North and the South. The Missouri Compromise passed by Congress consists of two parts. Well with Missouri being a slave state now, I am certain that many slaves will now be fleeing away. Sometimes we lose, sometimes we win. At least Maine will be a free state, allowing the welcoming of everyone. Well for sure slavery will be excluded in all the new states that we got from the Louisiana Purchase, North of the Southern boundary of Missouri. Those folks can have a sense of relaxation. This compromise has achieved what it was intended to do. Now our nation will remain united by having an equal balance of states that want slavery, and those that do not. I sometimes wonder if this is only a temporary solution. Will this awaken future leaders to strive for a better tomorrow? I feel that this has prevented any war that might have been planned to erupt.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tensions between the north and the south came to a head after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state, which threatened to upset the balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress organized a two-part compromise in 1820 called the Missouri Compromise. This compromise granted Missouri’s request but also admitted Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave states that remained the law of the land until it was negated by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This policy promoted sectionalism as it continued the separation of states but for the time being, put the argument over slavery at ease.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Slave owners living in Missouri did not want people to Kansas and Nebraska to become free states and if the Missouri Compromise stayed than both states would become free states, because they are both above the longitude line that decides if a state is a slave owning state or not. If both states became free states than Missouri might have been forced to change from slave owning state to free but the people from Missouri in government did not allow the development…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays