Preview

Summary: The Influence Of Case Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
463 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: The Influence Of Case Law
Influence of Case Law on Policing

Of the numerous things that can change policies and procedures within a police department, or multiple police departments, case law is probably the most common. Case law extends from rulings of the courts on certain topics that may not have a written policy or that may cause existing policy to be reviewed and rewritten. Perhaps the landmark case that has had the most substantial influence on modern policing is Terry v. Ohio. In the case, Detective McFadden of the Cleveland Ohio Police Department, observed three men acting suspiciously around a business in the down town area. Suspecting that the men might be preparing to rob the store, McFadden approached the men. He then performed a protective pat down of their outer garments and located a hand gun on two of the men, including one named Terry. After the court upheld that for officer safety, the weapon frisk is acceptable, this case paved the way for future officers to be constitutionally supported when dealing with potential suspects who may be armed.
…show more content…

Bustamonte (1973). If not for this case and others like it, police officer searches would be limited to a warrant, probable cause, or exigent circumstances. By including the consent search into legitimate operational procedures, law enforcement officers have an additional option and do not have to wait for a warrant or for something bad to happen. An occupant of a residence or vehicle who is of a reasonable age can give consent for police to conduct a reasonable search. One problem that continues to bear its ugly head occasionally though, is that consent can be revoked by the person who granted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plainclothes Officer McFadden was patrolling downtown Cleveland to suppress purse swatches, shoplifting, and robbery of merchants plus shoppers when he observed John W. Terry and two cohorts case a corner store for a robbery. Officer McFadden became suspicious, went up to the three men and conducted a pat-down. When the officer pat-down the outside of Terry's coat, he felt something hard in Terry's outer pocket that felt like a gun. McFadden reached into that pocket only and confiscated an illegally possessed gun. Officer proceeded and arrested Terry.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In schneckloth, the argument that voluntary consent could not be valid unless the D knew that he/she had a right to refuse the request to being searched was rejected because the court believes that the gov. does not need to establish the reasonableness of effective consent. Just as it wouldn’t be practical to enforce the consent search the requirement’s details of an effective warning it would also be unreasonable for officers to always inform the people they are detaining that they are able to leave before the consent to search was…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The owner of the café did not allow a non-customer to use the phone, does this mean the owner of the Lucky Spoon Café is negligent in the death of Louis Jones?…

    • 3010 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Brief

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case originated back in October 1963, involving John W. Terry and Richard Chilton. The two men were seen on a corner by veteran police detective, Martin McFadden, of the Cleveland Police Department, Ohio. According to the officer, the two men were acting in a suspicious way, by peering into the same store window. The two men were seen making multiple trips toward the window, when a third man came into the scenario. The officer suspected the men of “casing” the store for robbery. The officer followed the men and then stopped and questioned them. He first grabbed Terry and conducted a pat down and located a pistol on the inside of his jacket. Finding the weapon, he ordered the men into the nearby store, where a more invasive search ensued. He then removed Terry’s jacket and removed the weapon from its holster. A weapon was also found on Chilton, and both were charged with carrying concealed weapons.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After looking at the totality of the circumstances it is concluded that if a defendant consents to a search, even without being advised he is free to go, the search will be…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Decision: Desmond Campbell, you are convicted of the murder of Janet Campbell. I sentence you to a non parole period of…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terry V. Ohio Case Study

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Terry v. Ohio case took place on December 12th of 1976. The case was filed by John Terry who claimed that his arrest resulted from an invasion of his privacy. Terry believed that Officer McFadden violated his 4th Amendment rights, which protect citizens of the United States from unlawful searches and seizures conducted by police officers or law enforcement agents.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One does not expect to leave their house and have a stranger barge into their home and rummage through their belongings. This is the situation that Petitioner David Fallsbauer found himself in with not a stranger, but a highly esteemed officer of the law, whom unreasonably dissected his possessions. Under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, citizens are protected against the unbridled and unreasonable searches and seizures. One exception is through consent to the search. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219 (9th Cir. 1973). Petitioner David Fallsbauer can demonstrate through established case law that the consent his mother gave was ambiguous. Because his mother’s consent was ambiguous, the consent was not…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio is an important case that made history. For the reason it has to do the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment. All evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Federal Constitution is inadmissible in a criminal trial in a state court. Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U. S. 25, overruled insofar as it holds to the contrary. Pp. 367 U. S. 643-660.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case would become important because it expanded the ruling of a police stop and frisk. This means that the case set a new precedent. The new precedent changed the original precedent that was set during the Terry v. Ohio case.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    law case

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of this arbitration paper is written for arbitration meeting conducted on April 4th 2014 for the incident happened in February 15th.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Terry Stop Case Study

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Justice Harlan wholeheartedly agree with the Court 's ultimate holding in this case, He was constrained to fill in a few gaps, as he saw it because what was said by this Court has serve as initial guidelines for law enforcement authorities and courts throughout the land as this important new field of law develops. A police officer 's right to make an on-the-street "stop" and an accompanying "frisk" for weapons is, of course, bounded by the protections afforded by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court holds and he agrees, that, while the right does not depend upon possession by the officer of a valid warrant, nor upon the existence of probable cause, such activities must be reasonable under the circumstances as the officer credibly relates them in court. Since the question in this and most cases is whether evidence produced by a frisk is admissible, the problem is to determine what makes a frisk reasonable. Concealed weapons create an immediate and severe danger to the public, and though that danger might not warrant routine general weapons checks, it could well warrant action on less than a "probability." In the absence of state authority, policemen have no more right to "pat down" the outer clothing of passers-by, or of persons to whom they address casual questions, than does any other citizen. Consequently, the Ohio courts did not rest the constitutionality of this frisk upon any…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    CJ 101 4th Amendment

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This effected law enforcement officers in several ways. First, when the Supreme Court ruled in Ohio’s favor it stated that if there is reasonable suspicion, i.e. behavior that indicates someone might be armed, such as casing a business. The officer has the right to detain, and do what has become known as a “terry pat down” of the outer layer of clothing to search for weapons. This does not give the officer the right to go into pockets unless he can articulate that what he felt from the outside was an item consistent with a known weapon. This benefits the officers by keeping the safer on the street. I can personally vouch that a person can hide a weapon just about anywhere, and you can’t always tell by looking at them if they are armed. Second, the court affirmed that you have to have reasonable suspicion; you…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consensual Encounter

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    In 1968, supreme court stated that in the case of Terry v. Ohio, a police officer can stop an individual for questioning if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the person is about to commit, is committing or is going to commit a crime. In addition, supreme court stated that officers can search for weapons for the protection of the officer if he feels threatened.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police departments draft and implement policies and procedures to provide consistency and eliminate ambiguity in department practices. These are guidelines are for staff and officers to follow in a variety of different situations. Police policies and procedures may have the force of law, or be considered by a court or jury in determining whether an officer acted lawfully in the line of duty. Procedures related to employee actions can also be subject to legal scrutiny in some cases. A lack of policies on issues involving the community may result in unlawful and inconsistent police action. These adverse actions can create a negative reaction within the community, and open the police officers within the department to legal liability.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics