In details, Wen’s and Li’s perspectives are very similar, which can be found in two different ways: appearance and function.
First of all, from their description, the style of furniture and interior deign are visually simple, concise, and in good taste. All the materials the creators need, are very common and cheap. According to Superfluous Things, Wen argues that no matter what object it is, …show more content…
First, Wen’s work seemed so much more objective in his introduction of the rule of using and arranging the furniture and interior design than Li’s work. Furthermore, Wen wrote many short paragraphs to introduce the furniture and interior one by one. Each paragraph is very clear and pointed, which help me to catch up the useful information quickly.
In the notions on room order, it shows that the textbook authors only share the perspectives of the native informants; they just translate and paraphrase the excerpts from the original text without any change. In the Chinese furniture, the textbook authors engage the perspectives rather than just sharing information, they summarize some text to show clearly their thesis: Li Yu as a great Ming “scholar” and decorator, is a perfect example to help us to understand the art of living “Chinese