Abstract This article examines the impact of inertia on the management of the firm’s supply chain operations and the effects it can have on a produce-to-stock firm’s ability to respond to external market pressure and develop corrective strategies. The research methodology used is based on earlier Catastrophe Modeling that looked at inertia in organizational design, competitive pressure, and competitive response. The model demonstrates how latent variables, such as customer pressure and supply chain inertia can influence a finished goods supply chain management’s response under various conditions. The model was tested and validated using questionnaire data gathered from a sample of members of the Council of Logistics Management. The model was used to estimate individual finished goods firm inertia response estimates. We incorporate these estimates in a brief examination of three produce-to-stock firms from the sample to give readers an idea of the usefulness of the approach in examining supply chain inertia. D 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Produce-to-stock management inertia; Supply chain inertia; Catastrophe modeling; Organizational inertia; Customer pressure; Supply chain response
1. Introduction The management of supply chains in today’s highly competitive environment requires that logistics managers respond quickly to competitive challenges, inventory shortages, customer complaints, inaccurate order processing, and unreliable transportation situations. New technologies and processes such as radio frequency identification (RFID) and collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment (CPFR) initiatives are being incorporated into supply chain management operations to provide managers with a competitive edge. In today’s intensely competitive environment, bunprepared corporations that have not whipped their supply chains into shape are beginning to feel the squeeze in the form of slashed profit
References: Alexander, R. Herbert, DeShon, G., & Hanges, P. (1992). An examination of least-squares regression modeling of catastrophe theory. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 366 – 379. Anderson, D., & Mulani, N. (2003, July 26). Do you know where your supplier is? Ascet (pp. 1 – 6). Montgomery Research Inc. Bargman, T. (2003). Collaborative efforts speeding up time to market on launches. 2003 Retail and Consumer Goods Shared Strategy Study, PRTM, 1 – 3. Census of US business firms and industries (pp. 36 – 50). (2003). Washington, D.C.7 U.S. Government Printing Office. Christopher, M. (2000). Agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37 – 44. Cobb, L. (1978). Stochastic catastrophe models and multimodal distributions. Behavioral Science, 23, 360 – 374. Cobb, L. (1981). Parameter estimation for the cusp catastrophe model. Behavioral Science, 26, 75 – 78. Emmelhainz, L. W., Stock, J., & Emmelhainz, M. (1989). Retail stockouts: Now what? Annual conference proceedings (pp. 71 – 79). Oak Brook, IL7 Council of Logistics Management. Fararo, T. (1978). An introduction to catastrophes. Behavioral Science, 23, 291 – 317. Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organization design (pp. 234 – 238). Reading, MA7 Addison-Wesley. Gresov, C., Haveman, H., & Oliva, T. (1993, May). Organizational design, inertia and the dynamics of competitive response. Organization Science, 4, 1 – 28. Guastello, S. J. (1982). Moderator regression and the cusp catastrophe application of two-stage personnel selection, training therapy, and policy evaluation. Behavioral Science, 27, 259 – 272. Guastello, S. J. (1995). Chaos, catastrophe, and human affairs (pp. 121 – 125). Mahwah, N.J.7 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Isnard, C., & Zeeman, E. (1976). Some models from catastrophe theory in the social sciences. In L. Coffins (Ed.), The use of models in the social sciences (pp. 44 – 100). London, UK7 Tavistock Publications. Kauffman, R., & Oliva, T. (1994). Multivariate catastrophe model estimation: Method and application. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 206 – 221. Lancioni, R. (1986). The decision process in physical distribution management. Journal of Business Logistics, 23 – 31. Lancioni, R., & Foster, T. (1997). In house survey of inventory strategies in the personal care industry. Distribution Magazine. Philadelphia, Pa, 3 – 7. Lang, R., McDade, S., & Oliva, T. (2001, May 12). Technological choice and network externalities: A catastrophe model analysis of firm software adoption for competing operating systems. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 29 – 57. Lange, R., Oliva, T., & McDade, S. (2000). An algorithm for estimating multivariate catastrophe models: GEMCAT II. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 4(3), 137 – 164. Miklas, W. E. (1979). Measuring customer response to stockouts. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management, 9(5), 213 – 242. Murphy, Dan (2001). Friction in the supply chain, part 2. Supply Chain Management. Philadelphia, Pa, 1 – 4. Oliva, T., DeSarbo, W., Day, D., & Jedidi, K. (1987). GEMCAT: A multivariate methodology for estimating catastrophe models. Behavioral Science, 32, 121 – 137. Oliva, T., Oliver, R., & MacMillan, I. (1992, July). A catastrophe model for developing service satisfaction strategies. Journal of Marketing, 56, 83 – 95. Oliva, T., Peters, M., & Murthy, H. (1981). A preliminary empirical test of a cusp catastrophe model in the social sciences. Behavioral Science, 26, 153 – 162. Patosalmi, Juda. (2003). Collaborative supply chain management. 50457P, Helsinki Institute of Technology, Institute of Strategy and International Business, 1/25, 1 – 6. Pellet, J. (2002, August–September). Mastering the supply chain. The Chief Executive, 1 – 5. Roberts-Witt, S. (2002, December). Re-inventing the supply chain. CRM Magazine, 1 – 8. 628 M.F. Smith et al. / Industrial Marketing Management 34 (2005) 614–628 Richard A. Lancioni is a Full Professor of Marketing and Logistics, and Chair, Marketing Department, Fox School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. He has authored more than 120 articles in the field of logistics and marketing and has conducted numerous seminars for many of the Fortune 500 companies including IBM, General Motors, Exxon-Mobil, Roche Pharmaceutical, DuPont, Coca Cola, and many others. He has lectured and given seminars around the world including Europe, Japan, Australia, and South America. He is recognized as one of the leading logisticians in the US. His research interests include customer service, pricing management, supply chain management, and marketing. He is a member of the American Marketing Association and the Council of Logistics Management. Terence A. Oliva is a Full Professor of Marketing at Temple University’s Fox School of Business and Management. He has eclectic research interest and has published in a wide variety of journal including Mgt. Sci, JM, JMR, JCR, AMJ, Org. Sci., AMR, Behv., Sci., and others. His recent research focus has been in Catastrophe Theory applied to high technology products. He helped develop the GEMCAT program for estimating catastrophe models. Michael F. Smith is currently an Associate Professor of Marketing at the Fox School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. He has authored numerous articles in the fields of retailing, marketing, pricing, and channels of distribution. He has conducted numerous seminars for many of the leading US business firms. His research interests include channels management, retailing, supply chain management, and marketing management. He is a member of the American Marketing Association and the Council of Logistics Management. Sheridan, J., & Abelson, M. (1983). Cusp catastrophe model of employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 418 – 436. Stock, J., & Lambert, D. (2001). Strategic logistics management (pp. 15 – 23). McGraw Hill-Irwin. Thom, R. (1975). Structural, stability and morphogenesis (pp. 35 – 40). Reading, MA7 Benjamin. Thomas’s Register, (2003). New York7 McKenzie, pp. 8 – 11. Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York7 McGraw-Hill. Todd, Stephen. (2001, July/August). How to support new production introductions. Supply Chain Management Review, 29 – 31. Varian, H. (1979). Catastrophe theory and the business cycle. Economic Inquiry, 27, 14 – 28. Walters, C. (1971). Customer Responses to Stock-Outs, An Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1971, pp. 15–21. Williams, Susan. (2003, June). Managing supply—Supplying management. Logistics/SupplyChain, 1 – 5. Windham, Laurie. (2003, December). Are your customers suffering from SILO syndrome. Intelligent Enterprise, 1 – 4. Woodcock, A., & Davis, M. (1978). Catastrophe theory (pp. 78 – 81). New York7 E.P. Dutton. Zeeman, E. (1974). On the unstable behavior of stock exchanges. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 39 – 49. Zeeman, E. (1976, May). Catastrophe theory. Scientific American, 65 – 83. Zeeman, E. (1977). Catastrophe theory: Selected papers 1972–1977 (pp. 41 – 46). Reading, MA7 Addison-Wesley. Zeeman, E., Hall, C., Harrison, P., Marriage, G., & Shapland, P. (1976). A model for institutional disturbances. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 29, 66 – 80.