Preview

Supreme Court Major Cases

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4278 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Major Cases
John Scarr
Mr. Louis
Ap. Us pd. 7
10/30/12
Supreme Court
Marbury vs. Madison (1803):
On the final of his presidency, John Adams named forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen new circuit court justices for the District of Columbia with the “Midnight Appointments”. “The Midnight Appointments” were an attempt by the Federalists to take control of the federal judiciary prior to Thomas Jefferson taking office.
The commissions were signed by President Adams and sealed by acting Secretary of State John Marshall (who later became Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and author of this opinion), but they were not delivered before the termination of Adams’s presidency. Thomas Jefferson refused to honor the commissions, claiming that they were invalid because they had not been delivered by the end of Adams’s term.
In the case of Marbury v Madison, the actual suit was William Marbury applying to the Supreme Court of the United States to compel James Madison, Jefferson’s Secretary of State, to deliver the commissions.
The constitutional issue present in the case was whether or not the Supreme Court had the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether or not they are unconstitutional, making them void. The other Constitutional issue in the case was whether or not Congress can expand the scope the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction beyond that which is defined in Article III of the Constitution.
The court’s Ruling was actually somewhat mixed. The court ruled that Marbury did have right to the commissions because the order would go into effect when Adams signed the papers. This was so because he was still in power when he signed them. The also ruled that Congress did not have the power to expand the original jurisdiction of Supreme Court beyond that which is specified in Article III of the Constitution. Their reasoning behind this was that the Constitution states “the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the supreme court had announced for the first time the concept that a court has the right to declare an act of congress void if it is inconsistent with the constitution. In addition William Marbury was an intended recipient of an appointment as a justice of the peace in the area of Columbia. Then when James Madison, Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, he refused to deliver Marbury’s commission. Marbury and 3 others joined and petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling delivery of the…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What was the case: Marbury was a soon-to-be appointed justice of the peace when Adam’s presidency came to an end, resulting in his successor, Thomas Jefferson denying credibility of the appointments because they were not completed during the time of Adam’s presidency. Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison, was asked to allow the commissions.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Marbury V. US

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803)). Marbury has a right to this commission due to it being the last act and sealed by the Secretary of State. The Judiciary department job is to say what law is. In this case they have to interpret whether President Jefferson is breaking a law by not allowing Marbury to assume his duties as the Justice of Peace. The Judiciary department will ensure that two laws do not conflict if it does the court will decide the operations of each law. “If courts are to regard the Constitution, and the Constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.” (See, e.g. Cheney v. United States Dist. Court For D.C. (03-475) 542 U.S. 367 (2004) 334 F.3d…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The law stated that Marbury does have the right to the commission and it became effective when it was signed by President Adams. It was also stated that the law against Marbury a remedy because one of the duties provided by the government is to provide affordable protection. The Supreme Court also has the authority to review acts of congress and up to them to determine whether they are unconstitutional and therefore void. The congress also cannot expand the slope of the supreme courts. Original jurisdiction beyond what is specified in article III of the constitution. . Lastly the Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction to issue units of…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Con Law Outline

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Congress acted unconstitutionally by giving the Sup Ct jurisdiction under the Judiciary Act of 1789.…

    • 5129 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    was drawn in a unanimous decision, but the Supreme Court held that Congress had the power to…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taking place in 1803, Marbury v. Madison was the landmark case that set the standard of judicial review into effect. This means that any previous ruling on a case can be used as a precedent and can determine the verdict. The background of this case is all sorts of messy; when John Adams’ term was near its end, William Marbury and a few others were appointed as “justices of peace” for the District of Columbia, however their positions were never official. When Thomas Jefferson came into office, he told James Madison, the Secretary of State at the time, to deny Marshall and the others’ commissions, so Marbury and the others then sued Madison. John Marshall ruled in favor of Marbury however could not deliver his commission because the constitution conflicted with a legislative act known as the Judiciary Act of 1789. This case was significant because it served as the basis for Article III of the Constitution that sets the standards…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the last days of his presidency, John Adams tried to fill the judiciary with so-called “midnight judges”. All of Adams’ judges were Federalists - those who favored a strong national government. However, Thomas Jefferson became the President before all the commissions were delivered; many of the Federalist judges never got their jobs. Thomas Jefferson, unlike Adams, was a Democratic Republican, the party that opposed Federalist ideals. William Marbury, a Federalist judge who never got his judge, decided to sue James Madison, who was Jefferson’s secretary of state that refused to deliver the commissions.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He sought to introduce into the judicial system “an executive principle to secure effective team work.” To accomplish this goal, Taft proposed annual meetings of the Chief Justice and the Senior Circuit Judges. The conference would make “a yearly plan for the massing of the new and old judicial force of the United States in those districts all over the country where the arrears” were, “threatening to interfere with the usefulness of courts.” Taft spoke passionately about the need for annual meetings and lobbied various interest groups from Congress to the American Bar Association. The Conference of Senior Circuit Judges, composed of the Chief Justice and nine Circuit Senior Judges, was established by the Act of September 14, 1922, to meet annually upon the summons of the Chief Justice. The Conference was to make a comprehensive survey of the condition of the business in the courts, prepare plans for the assignment of judges, and submit suggestions to the courts in the interest of uniformity and expedition of business. Taft proudly presided over the Conference, voted as a member, and appointed its committees, all the while serving as its staff and animating…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Marbury vs Madison case would have to be one of the most important cases in Supreme Court history. The Marbury vs Madison cases was one of the first cases in U.S. history to ever to apply the principle of Judicial review the Judicial review had the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution , which was written by Chief Justice John Marshall. How it had all started was in 1803 in John Adams last few hours of office John Adams had appointed Marbury and many other judges in his last few hours of office. Republicans argued that these appointments were aimed at maintaining Federalist power. When Thomas Jefferson finally took office he ordered his secretary of states James Maddison to cease the work of…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Case

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    The factors that lead up to the case of Marbury v. Madison are the president that was leaving the office, John Adams, had issued a commission as justice of the peace. What happened was that the new Secretary of State, James Madison, had refused to deliver it. Marbury then sued in order to obtain his commission. The decision that was made by the Supreme Court was that a law that was passed by Congress and signed by the president was declared unconstitutional. There was nothing written in the Constitution that specific power to do that. Chief Justice Marshall believed that the Supreme Court should have an equal role just like the other two branches of government. The future case that was impacted by this case was the Martin…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written by Chief Justice John Marshall, the majority ruled that while Marbury was entitled to receive his commission and that courts are able to grant remedies, the Supreme Court did not have the right to grant the plaintiff his legal order. The reasoning behind this was that Marbury’s request was based on a law passed by Congress that the Court deemed unconstitutional (Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789). The Court then stated that when the Constitution and the law conflict, it is the Supreme Court’s duty to uphold the law of the land and rule in unity with the Constitution.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was his job to the commsions to the new appointees. Many of them were delivered while some were not, including William Marbury’s. When the new President, Thomas Jefferson was sworn in, he told James Madison, who was the new Secretary of Sate, to not deliver the commissions to the other judge appointees. Marbury and many others brought a lawsuit to make Madison deliver the commissions. They then asked the Supreme Court, in its original juristdiction, to issue a writ of “Mandamus”, a court order directing Madison to carry out his duty to deliver the commissions. This leads us to the case of William Marbury, v. James Madison in front of the Supreme Court, with ex-Secretary of State John Marshall as Chief Justice.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a consistent choice, composed by Justice Marshall, the Court expressed that Marbury, to be sure, had a privilege to his bonus. Be that as it may, all the more essentially, the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unlawful. As Marshall would see it, Congress couldn't give the Supreme Court the ability to issue a request allowing Marbury his bonus. Just the Constitution could, and the record said nothing in regards to the Supreme Court having the ability to issue such a request. Along these lines, the Supreme Court couldn't compel Jefferson and Madison to designate Marbury, in light of the fact that it didn't have the ability to do as…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is because the act was passed just before the end of his presidency, and it is said that Adams appointed many of the judges at midnight before Jefferson’s inauguration. Along with choosing the new judges, Adams made another move so that Federalists could further control the Judicial system. He appointed his Secretary of State, John Marshall, to serve as the next Chief Justice. Doing this further shut Jefferson out from the Judiciary system, leaving all of the power in the hands of the Federalists. Adams specifically felt that it was necessary because Marshall told him that by controlling the Judiciary system, the Federalists would upset Jefferson’s plans as that was the only branch of government that he wouldn’t have access to. Adams didn’t initially want to choose Marshall as the Chief Justice. However, after John Jay declined the position, Adams turned to Marshall who…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays