Preview

Sytems Thinking

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6566 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sytems Thinking
INCORPORATING SYSTEMS THINKING IN ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE PROJECTS USING ACTION RESEARCH BY PRACTITIONERS CONDUCTING ACADEMIC RESEARCH Dr. Shankar Sankaran Associate Professor, Faculty of Design Architecture and Building, University of Technology Sydney, City Campus, PO Box 123, NSW 2007, Australia Email: Shankar.sankaran@uts.edu.au Dr. Tay Boon Hou Technical Director, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, IN Technology Pte Ltd 10, Haig Lane, Singapore 438814 Email: intech01@singnet.com.sg Dr. Martin Orr Clinical Director, Information Services, Waitemata District Hospital, Email: Martin.Orr@waitematadhb.govt.nz ABSTRACT This paper explores the use of systems thinking in action research projects. It will describe two ‘real’ action research projects, where soft systems methodology was used by managers who introduced change in their own organizations. It elaborates how applying this methodology supported the application of action research. Both managers who used action research have successfully completed their doctorates in programs conducted by an Australian university. The paper discusses the relationship between soft systems methodology and action research, examines the problems faced in using this methodology in action research and discusses how systems thinking could be effectively applied by management researchers planning to conduct academic research. Keywords: Systems Thinking, Action Research, Soft Systems Methodology, Organizational Change, Management Research.

INTRODUCTION This paper starts with a brief explanation of action research (AR) and soft systems methodology (SSM) and then describes a doctoral program conducted by an Australian university where AR is often used by practitioners conducting academic research. Two AR projects are then described in which SSM was used. Next, a discussion on the use of systems thinking in action research projects is presented. The paper concludes with some suggestions on how to embed systems thinking approaches in action



References: Argyris, C., Putnam, R. and Mclain Smith, D. (1982). Action Science: Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. Brooks, A. and Watkins, K.F. (1994). The Emerging Power of Action Inquiry Technologies, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Checkland, P. (1993). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley, Chichester. Checkland, P. (1995), Soft systems methodology and its relevance to the development of information systems, in F.A. Stowell (ed.) Information Systems Provision: The Contribution of Soft Systems Methodology, McGraw Hill, London, pp. 1-15. Checkland, P. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology: A 30-year Retrospective, John Wiley, Chichester. Checkland, P. (2000a). The emergent properties of SSM in use: A symposium by reflective practitioners, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13 (6):799-823. Checkland, P. (2000b). New maps of knowledge and some animadversions (friendly) on science (reductionist) social science (hermeneutic), research (unmanageable) and universities (unmanaged), Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 17(S1):S59. Checkland, P. (2005). Webs of significance: The work of Geoffrey Vickers, Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 22(4):285-90. Checkland, P. (2006). Reply to Eden and Ackermann: The future of problem structuring methods? The Journal of Operational Research Society, 57(7):769-71. Checkland, P. and Holwell, S. (1998). Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field, John Wiley, Chichester. 15 Incorporating Systems Thinking in Action Research Checkland P. and Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students, John Wiley, Chichester. Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, John Wiley, Chichester. Checkland, P. and Winter, M. (2006). Process and content: Two ways of using SSM, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(12):1435-41. Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, National Academy Press, Washington DC. Curtis, G. and Cobham, D. (2002). Business Information Systems: Analysis, Design and Practice, 4th edn., Pearson, Essex. Dick, B. (1993). You Want to Do an Action Research Thesis?, [Online], Available at http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/art/arthesis.html. Dick, B. (2000). Soft Systems Methodology. Session 13 of Areol- Action Research and Evaluation Online, [Online], http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/areol/areolsession13.html. Dick, B. (2001). Action research: action and research, in S. Sankaran, B. Dick, R. Passfield and P. Swepson, (eds.) Effective Change Management Using Action Learning and Action Research , Southern Cross University Press, Lismore, 21-27. Dick, B. and Swepson, P. (1994). Appropriate Validity and its Attainment Within Action Research: An Illustration Using Soft Systems Methodology, [Online], http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/sofsys2.html. Elrod, P. and Tippet, D. (2002). The death valley of change, Journal of Organisational Change and Management, 15 (3): 273-291. Flood, R.L. (2001). The relationship between ‘systems thinking’ to action research in P.Reason and H. Bradbury (eds.) The Handbook of Action Research, Sage, London, 133-134. Glouberman, S. and Mintzberg, H. (1996). Managing the care of health and the cure of disease. Part 1: Differentiation, Healthcare Management Review, 26 (1):56-59. Greenwood, D. and Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change, 2n d edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks. Heeks, R., Mundy, D. and Salazar, A. (1999). Why healthcare information systems succeed or fail ?, Information Systems for Public Sector Management, Working paper series, Paper No. 9, Institute for Development Policy and Management, Manchester, UK. Jackson, M.C. (2003) Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers, John Wiley, Chichester. Kelly, M.A. and Tucci, J.M. (2001). Bridging the quality chasm, BMJ, 323:61-62. Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner, 3rd. edn., Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. Mirijamdotter, A. (1998). A Multi-modal Systems Extension to Soft Systems Methodology, PhD Thesis, Department of Informatics and Systemic Science, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden. Orr, M. (2000). Implementation of Health Information Systems, MBA Dissertation, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW. Orr, M. (2006). The Implementation of Electronic Health Knowledge Management Systems, DBA Thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW. Orr, M. and Sankaran, S. (2007). Mutual empathy, ambiguity, and the implementation of electronic knowledge management within the complex health system’, Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 9(1-2):41-52. Raelin, J.A. (1999). Preface: Special Issue, Management Learning, 30(2):115-25. Reason, P. (2006). Choice and quality in action research practice, Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2):187-203. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of Action Research, Sage, London. 16 Incorporating Systems Thinking in Action Research Sarah, R., Haslett, T., Molineux, J., Olsen, J., Stephens, J., Tepe, S. and Walker, B. Business action research in practice- A strategic conversation about conducting action research in business organizations, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 15 (6), pp. 535546. Sankaran, S., Hase, S. Dick, B. and Davies, A. (2006). Reflections on Developing an Offshore Action Research/Learning Based PhD Program, Action Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2):1-15. Tay, B.H. (2003). Using Action Research to Develop a Social Technical Diagnostic Expert System for an Industrial Environment, PhD Thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW. West, D. and Stansfield, M.H. Structuring action and reflection in information systems action research studies using Checkland’s FMA model, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 14 (3), 251-281. Wilson, B. (1984). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications, John Wiley: Chichester. 17

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Edld 5301 Week 2 Assignment

    • 3613 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Last week students had an opportunity to examine the differences in action research and traditional research. Students began to answer questions like:…

    • 3613 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Systems thinking is thought to facilitate decision making in complex domains (Stephen & Thibodeau, 2017). Psychologists state systems thinking helps organise over-thinking and teaches people to look at the world as a bunch of systems (Haughton, 2017). Learning this engaged me instantly as I am guilty of over-thinking most situations. A key opportunity to implement systems thinking was when I worked on the McDonalds case study. I approached this case by thinking of it purely like a system or a process map. By taking the systems thinking approach I feel I was able to provide viable solutions to McDonalds issue of long queues and poor service times by designing system efficiencies. My key take-away from the McDonalds case and learning about systems thinking is to not over think and focus on inputs, feedback loops and outputs to solve…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership Discovery Project

    • 4375 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Systems are everywhere. A person has a system how to wash clothes, how to wash dishes. A person even has a system how to write their term papers. The childcare sector has uses the system theory. “This is where writers, educators, consultants, and theorist help managers to look at the center from a broader perspective.” (Carter McNamara MBA)A system is getting input from the environment, to process a plan of action, implementing the plan to reach the common goal.…

    • 4375 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contrast Action Research focuses on a qualitative methodology to provide a form of self-reflective research methodology that focuses on phenomenon that can potentially be improved by the research if actionable steps are taken after the research has been conducted. Researchers are far more involved in action research than in traditional research and have a vested interest in the outcome of the research as most action research is undertaken by researchers who attempt to chance social situations in order to improve the…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Laws, K., & McLeod, R. (2004). Case study and grounded theory: Sharing some alternative qualitative research methodologies with systems professionals. Systems Dynamics Society (pp. 1-25). Oxford, England, UK: HVR Consulting Services Ltd.…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical Mass Analysis

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Critical Mass Analysis is used by action research facilitators to gauge the involvement of their stakeholders in their project (Beckhard & Harris, 1977). Completing this analysis can help researchers determine where their stakeholders are and where they need them to be. The process can help to lay out the steps needed to ensure that their stakeholders are providing enough support during and after the project. This paper will examine the outcome of the Critical Mass analysis held for my project, currently titled “Intranet Traffic”.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the 1940s, Kurt Lewin coined the term ‘action research’. Within this new paradigm, Lewin included two ideas. First, action research was to be based on knowledge which was created through academic research. Second, it was to be based on knowledge which was created while intervening in practice (Bargal, 2008). Although this term was coined 70 odd years ago, this methodology is described as being emergent in nature (Costello, 2011). It is a methodology which has shown to constantly develop over time through the introduction of new models, cycles and justifications for its stance in social science research. Particularly in the last 15 years, the recognition of action research as a valued methodology has changed. In 1999, Avison et…

    • 5058 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Action Research

    • 7996 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Introduction Action research (AR) theory suggests that the AR process starts with a notion in the practitioner’s mind that a change in practice is justified. This paper will explore a model of AR that can be applied to research in the area of management when experience and a literature review has enabled the researcher to have a reasonable idea of the problems to be investigated. In deciding upon an AR methodology, it is necessary to identify several issues (these can be found in detail in French, 2009b) and then…

    • 7996 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Principal Registered Nurse

    • 3276 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Westbrook, R. (1995). Action research: a new paradigm for research in production and operations management, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15(12), 6-20…

    • 3276 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spar Applied Systems

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2 Spar Applied Systems Spar Applied Systems (A): Organizational Change and Team Management Everybody is familiar with the cliché that the only constant in this world is change. In today’s fast-evolving environment, people attempt to manage change in their everyday lives, seeing its potential and enormous benefits. For business organizations managing change has become an important strategy to achieve competitive advantage and to position oneself on top of the competition. One of the critical success factors in managing organizational change is teambuilding. In the case study “Spar Applied Systems (A)”, Laura Erskine covers the issue of teambuilding, employee participation, organizational change and change management. Specifically, Erskine presents the dilemma of Stephen Miller, Spar Applied Systems General Manager, who is confronting a major project overrun. The team began working on their project in 1994. After two years, however, in their presentation of the projected budget and schedule to the executives, Miller was amazed to know that there was a potential $1 million overspend in order to satisfy their contract. Originally, the budget was $3.5 million, $2.5 million of which was shouldered by the company. When Miller questioned the team members during the presentation about the overrun and overspend, he was surprised that the team could not respond. The case study first tackles the organizational change initiatives and management at Spar Applied Systems. In 1992, Jason Rigney led the successful merging of Spar Defense and Leigh Instruments. Through his leadership, contracts were stabilized and Applied Systems was founded. However, the environment was beginning to become more and more competitive, and the competition came from large-scale, highly flexible, and vertical integrated firms who had gone global. When Miller joined the Applied Systems Groups, he was greeted by a hierarchical organization, people with precise position descriptions, and activities directed…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Aronson, D. (1996). Overview of System Thinking. Retrieved on November 17, 2007 from http://www.thinking.net…

    • 2314 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Action research unlike traditional research is based on the proposition that generalized solutions may not fit particular contexts or groups of people and that the purpose of inquiry is to find an appropriate solution for the particular dynamics at work in a local situation (Stringer,2007, p.5). On the other hand, traditional research takes steps to support a theory or hypothesis along with actual data. It will identify a problem, determine the reason why the problem exits, collect and analyze data, formulate conclusion and apply the conclusion to the original hypothesis (AllPsych Online, n.d.). Traditional research will take steps in assigning groups to partake in the research.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today’s leaders who are committed know how to manage the organizational impact of information systems can sharply reduce the behavioural resistance to change, including to new technology (Lorenzi, & Riley, 2000).…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Research Paper

    • 3332 Words
    • 14 Pages

    System effects fit into three stages. Although not always thought of as an effect, one of the most fundamental results of introducing an information system into an organization is that the system either is used or is not. This first-order effect must not be neglected, because it is quite common for systems not to be used and such nonuse is a major reason for systems' not achieving their design objectives. And, if the system is used, the question of how the system is used-when, by whom, for what purpose, and so forth-remains a significant issue. Systems are often used in ways other than intended, sometimes with positive consequences, as when a decision support system also serves as a tool for improving customer relations and sometimes with negative consequences, as when an executive information system is used to intimidate subordinates, stifling creativity. So, understanding if and how a system is used is an essential first step in evaluating system effects.…

    • 3332 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Action research is known for its feasibility, practicality, and convenience of offering a way for educators to conduct research within their own classrooms to improve upon existing methods and experiment with new practices. However, action research is not without its own limitations. The other research paradigms offer alternative methods to further educational practices as well. Quantitative and qualitative research propose different methodologies to study the area of education. Within the quantitative design, experimental types of research can be conducted using large random sampling methods, which provide the researcher with generalizations regarding the study (Lodico, et al., 2006). Qualitative research differs…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays