Homosexuality and same sex marriage is one of the serious issue in our society. This essay summarize whether homosexuality and same sex marriage is still considered as a taboo or not. Taboo is any human behaviour that is normal for him/her but may not be for other. Hence, we could recognise taboo only at the time when we encounter other opposing our behaviour. Every society differs in its point of view regarding any sort of Taboo-defying behaviour. Hence homosexuality and same sex marriage is hotly debated between individuals that, should it be considered as a taboo or not? People tolerance to the behaviour like homosexuality and same sex marriage depends upon their on their present norm, values and belief system. Degree of tolerance depends upon various factors like cultural background, religion, sex, historical period and location. Media is one of the prominent factors that make people aware about any social issue. Moreover media covers any social report as their prime report. Hence there are various opinions toward media coverage upon this issue. This essay tries to summarize how media act upon this social issue and what kind of role does it play to create awareness in public. International communication has significant role to create bridge between various nations hence it is obvious that the communication between two or different nation will eventually bring sharing of social issues and make changes to it according to the demand of situation. To show the impact of international communication upon the social issue of a nation, this essay uses Australia as a case study. Essay mainly focuses on how the international communication creates a gradual improvement in the attitude of people and whole nation towards homosexuality and same sex marriage. This essay also address how cultural elements impact laws and opinion, hence it identifies what type of cultural influence may change attitude towards homosexuality and same sex marriage.
INTRODUCTION
Dr. Hutton
References: Graham Carbery, 1993, Towards homosexual equality in Australian criminal law: A brief history, Australian Lesbian and Gay Archives Inc, accessed on 16 April 2013 < http://www.alga.org.au/files/towardsequality2ed.pdf> Haslam, Nick, & Levy, Sheri R. (2006). Essentialist Beliefs About Homosexuality: Structure and Implications for Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 471-485. Hekma, G., Oosterhuis, H., & Steakley, J. (1995). Leftist sexual politics and homosexuality: a historical overview. J Homosex, 29(2-3), 1-40. Herek, GregoryM Hewitt, Erin C., & Moore, Leslea D. (2002). The Role of Lay Theories of the Etiologies of Homosexuality in Attitudes Towards Lesbians and Gay Men. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6(3-4), 58-72. Jefferson, Stephen D. (2010). The Moderating Roles of Gender and Anti-Gay Prejudice in Explaining Stigma by Association in Male Dyads. Journal of homosexuality, 57(3), 401-414. Lee, Tien-Tsung. (2011). An Analysis of Factors Affecting Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage: Do the Media Matter? Journal of homosexuality, 58(10), 1391-1408. Raja, Sheela, & Stokes, JosephP. (1998). Assessing Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men: The Modern Homophobia Scale. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, 3(2), 113-134. Wallis, Wilson D. (1943). Miscellaneous: Taboo: A Sociological Study. Hutton Webster. American Anthropologist, 45(3), 478-478.