Preview

Taking A Closer Look At The Battle Of Marathon

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1383 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Taking A Closer Look At The Battle Of Marathon
The battle of Marathon was in September of 490 BCE between Greece and Persia. This battle also shows that thinking outside the box and not following the normal ways of fighting can help you survive and win. The Persian’s set their sights on Athens because they had an alliance with Athens to help them defeat Sparta. When they “signed” their alliance with Athens they asked for earth and water, which really meant that Athens would belong to Persia. Athens was unaware of what they were really signing so when they said they don’t need Persia anymore. This infuriated Darius and wanted to burn Athens to the ground. They would have to decide first of all weather they would go in for an amphibious campaign or a land campaign. Athens was their main …show more content…
Which the Athenian army would take positions in the Vrana valley because Miltiades knew that was the only way to get to Athens. So using METT-TC they would set up in the valley like a corkscrew on a bottle. The phalanx being their tactics they knew they could defend it from there because of the steep mountains protecting their flanks from the Persian cavalry. The Persian army would start with firing a barrage of arrows at the Greek army which would do little damage to them because of their heavy shields protected them from the waves of arrows. Next the Persians would send light infantry into the valley but the phalanx once and using the terrain would prove to be paramount and the Athenians were able to push them back. Miltiades would now have to make a move to be risky which was he had to push out of the valley. He then thinned out the center to reinforce the flanks which he did this to try to cover from side to side of the valley but this is also why he had to push out. The reason is if he didn’t do that when the center would get hit it would flex and if broken they would be surrounded and then defeated. This was risky for Miltiades to do this but he thought about his flanks most of all because he knew that was his weak area. When they came out of the valley to face the Persian force the Athenians starting running about 400 meters which would make them exhausted wearing 70 pounds worth of gear. They stopped about 100 meters and reestablished their phalanx. When the Persian infantry started to attack which was pushing the thinned out center of the Athens force back. At first it seemed like the risky move they made was not going to pay off. The heavily armored flanks were winning because it was common practice for the Persians to put their best fighters in the center and their weaker ones on the flanks. This would be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the Ionian Revolt of 499 BC, the Persians and their king Darius wanted to take control Greece. Persia wanted to extend its territory. And the Greeks had helped the Ionians to revolt against the Persians, and had marched to Sardis and burned the city. The Battle of Marathon took place in 490 BC during the first Persian invasion of Greece. It was fought between the citizens of Athens, helped by Plataea, and a Persian force commanded by Datis and Artaphernes.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miltiades biggest contribution was to the battle at Marathon which was considered a significant impact on the Persian wars. It was in the battle at Marathon where he showed both witt and skill against the Persian army. He was considered valuable to the athenians because of his former close relations with the Persian army, which meant he knew there tactics and there ways to which they fought in battle. The Athenians made Miltiades 10th Commander to which each day starting from commander one every commander would be given a chance to be in charge of the army. It was Miltiades who saw the fact that the Persian cavalary wasnt their as an advantage and to which could result in victory if the Athenian army attacked early. So Miltiades convinced Calimuchus the Polemarh to confront the Persian army and give him command. Miltiades battle tactics were both thoughtful and strategic as he used what he had learnt about the Persians against them with both ingenious and thoughful ideas. He made use of the terrain by placing his army on the top of the hill so that they had the higher ground and the best spot for when they made there way down hill so they were less tired and exhausted. It was said to be Miltiades who convinced the generals not to use their customary tactics of which hoplites (soldiers of greek cities) normally marched in an evenly distributed phanlanx of shields and spears. Miltiades was the one who had this great idea of attacking while the cavalary was not around. He knew that the Persians had there flanks set out that the strongest soldiers where in the middle of th e flank and the weakest on the outer flanks, so Miltiades devised this cunning plan to swap it around for his army. He made the strongest soldiers as the outer flanks and the weakest in the middle, so when it came to the fight the strongest soldiers could encirle the persian flanks and cause them distress and penick. His other contribution in the battle at Marathon tactics was the fact that he knew…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Persian Wars were a series of conflicts fought between the Greek states and the Persian Empire from 500-449 BC. It started in 500 BC, when a few Greek city-states on the coast of Asia Minor, who were under the control of the Persian Empire, revolted against the despotic rule of the Persian king Darius. Athens and Eretria in Euboea gave aid to these Greek cities but not enough, and they were subdued by the Persians. The Persians became determined to conquer Hellas and make Athens and Eretria pay for helping the Ionian cities. In 492 BC, the first Persian invasion had its fleet crippled by a storm before it could do any damage. King Darius sent another Persian expedition in 490 which destroyed Eretria and then faced the Athenians at the battle of Marathon. The Persian were defeated and forced to return home. Darius died before his preparations for a third invasion were completed, but they were continued by Xerxes I, his son and successor. In 480, Xerxes reached Greece with a tremendous army and navy. The Persian land forces had to pass through the narrow pass of Thermopylae, which was defended by the Spartan Leonidas. His small contingent held back the Persians but were eventually defeated. The Persians continued on to Athens, which had been abandoned, and burned it. The Athenians had fled with their fleet to the island of Salamis where they met up with other Greek forces. Shortly afterward, the Persians followed and were defeated in a sea battle off of Salamis. Xerxes returned to Persian but left a military force in Greece which was defeated in 479 BC at Plataea by a Greek army under the Spartan Pausanias, ending the threat of the Persians once and for all. (1)…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: The Battle of Thermopylae, a critical event in the Greco-Persian Wars of 480 BCE, is etched into the annals of ancient history as a symbolic confrontation between the Greek city-states and the Persian Empire. This monumental clash unfolded at the narrow pass of Thermopylae, highlighting the cultural and military disparities between the disciplined Greeks, led by the Spartans, and the vast Persian forces under King Xerxes I. As we delve into the historical significance of this battle, its enduring legacy becomes apparent, transcending its immediate military outcomes. Historical Background:.. The seeds of the Battle of Thermopylae were sown in the aftermath of the Persian defeat at Marathon in 490 BCE, as King Xerxes I sought revenge against Greece.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Greeks were victorious in the Second Persian War because of a number of factors. These include the superior leadership from commanders such as Themistocles and Leonidas, the effective Greek strategy and the cooperation of all the Greek city states to unite against a common threat. Ancient historians such as Aeschylus in his play ‘The Persians’ and Herodotus attribute the Greek victory to the so called ‘hubris’ or extreme confidence and arrogance showed by Xerxes. All these reasons played a crucial role in the Greek victory over the Persians in the Second Persian War.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Greeks weren’t so they gave the Persians a fight leading to Mardonius death, resulting to the Greeks winning. The Greeks won the battle of Plataea. Why the Greeks won was probably because their strategies, and strengths were having such a huge army including the Spartans and their a…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Battle of Plataea

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * In the summer of 479 BC, the Greeks assembled a huge army (by contemporary standards), and marched out of the Peloponnesus. The Persians retreated to Boeotia, and built a fortified camp near Plataea. The Greeks, however, refused to be drawn into the prime cavalry terrain around the Persian camp, resulting in a stalemate that lasted eleven days. However, whilst attempting a retreat after their supply lines were disrupted, the Greek battle-line fragmented. Thinking the Greeks in full retreat, Mardonius ordered his forces to pursue them, but the Greeks (particularly the Spartans, Tegeans and Athenians) halted and gave battle, routing the lightly armed Persians infantry and killing Mardinous…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spartans defended a strategic spot called the Pass of Thermopylae which was a narrow path about 50 feet wide with steep mountains surrounding it (flawlesslogic.com). This made it almost impossible for the Persian troops to penetrate.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The beginning of the war between the Persians and Greeks dates back nearly 15 years beforehand in 494 BC, at the Ionian revolt. During this time and age, the Persian Empire is a huge world power and have conquered a majority of the ancient world. Ionia is a small area of land off the coast of present day Turkey, near Greece. It had already been conquered by the Persian Empire, and was populated by Greeks. The Ionians revolted against the Persian rule and called for assistance from Greece. Out of the many polis’ in Greece, Athens was the only one to step in to aid them. They fought valiantly, but their revolt was quickly crushed to discourage any more rebellions. To even further discourage the people under their rule from revolting, King Darius of Persia decided to destroy the city of Athens as well, in order to teach everyone else a lesson not to oppose the great Persian Empire. In 490 BC, he sent 20,000 men across the sea to Greece, and they land in the city of Marathon. Persia demanded Greece to surrender but they would agree to their terms. The message the Greeks sent to the invading Persians stated, “We know you are a…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greco-Persian wars were arrangement of mayhem that began in 499 BC and endured in 449 BC. The arrangement of wars includes the Greek's political space and the Persian Realm. This started in 547 BC, when Cyrus the Incomparable attempted to overcome Iona, in light of the help sent by Athens and Eretria. Athens and Eretria succeeded in catching and blazing the territorial capital of Persia, Sardis. Be that as it may, they were constrained to pull back as a result of their overwhelming misfortunes. In view of this, Ruler Darius I, the Persian lord, pledged to blaze these two Greek locales. When the Ionian rebellion finished, Lord Darius started his arrangements in vanquishing Greece. He started his plot in 490 BC and effectively vanquished Eretria. He then sent his troops to Athens who arrived in a straight close to the Marathon, a town in Athens. It was additionally around the same time when Athens settled on a choice to stand up to the Persian domineering jerks and assault instead of just…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Battle of Marathon happened in 490 BC and lead to the rise of the city of Athens and the fall of the Persian Empire. The cause of the battle was the The Ionian Revolt which happened in 499-493 BC, the story is that Histiaeus didn’t like his long exile beyond the Tigris and wanted to go back to Ionia. He sent a message to Aristagoras on the head of a slave to tell him to start a rebellion. The Ionians got help from the Athenians but they saw the revolt was going to fail so left after they had burnt down Sardis according to Herodotus (5.102-5.103). This lead Darius to want be reminded of the Athenians so he could seek revenge as shown by Herodotus with the quote (6.94) “exhorted by his servant ‘remember the Athenians,’”.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now to the Persian wars. The Persian wars are a series of battles between Persia and Greece. The Persian Empire at the time stretched from the Indus valley to the Asia Minor and Egypt and was starting to get into Greece and Europe. A few city-states started to send solders to help their fellow Greeks. Nine years later Darius, the emperor of Persia at the time, started to take his revenge. The first invasion of Greece was in the plains of Marathon near Athens, a great and scholared city at the time. The Athenian army had 11,000 solders while the Persians had 15,000. With good weapons and clever leaders, the Greeks were able to win the battle of marathon.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leonidas

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leonidas handpicked 300 men to take with him to the Thermopylae, he was sent “in order that the sight of them might encourage the other confederates to fight and prevent them from going over to the enemy”. Leonidas as a young boy had been trained mentally and physically to fight in preparation to become a hoplite warrior, as a military leader handpicking his 300 men would have been a tactic used to find the strongest Spartan men who he trusted. The 300 Spartan men would have been equipped with a round shield, spear and iron short sword. In battle they used a formation called the phalanx in which rows if hoplites stood directly next to each so shields overlapped with one another. When the Persians attacked from the side and back of the phalanx, the Spartan formation would have been vulnerable which proved to be Leonidas weakness against the invading army. Leonidas although had a strong 300 Spartans he did not have enough tactics and men to stop a strong Persian army in battle, which limited his contribution to the Persian war.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Sparta beats Demaratus and his army that war will be the most memorable war fought in history during that time. During that time of the battle, the Persian army was not doing as expected even though they had renewed their onslaught hope they could defeat the badly hurt and dismembered Greek army. The Greeks used tactics that the Persians were not ready for by using waves of…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soldier's in Battle

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Chapter-2 the author has discussed the Greeks defense of their homeland against the Persian invader Emperor Xerxes in a mountain pass called Thermopylae. A Spartan Leonidas stopped with 7000 men out of whom were 300 Spartans who were trained to be soldiers since the age of seven. Leonidas command proved fatal for Xerxes and resulted in his defeat.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays