Preview

Taking A Closer Look At The Battle Of Marathon

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1383 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Taking A Closer Look At The Battle Of Marathon
The battle of Marathon was in September of 490 BCE between Greece and Persia. This battle also shows that thinking outside the box and not following the normal ways of fighting can help you survive and win. The Persian’s set their sights on Athens because they had an alliance with Athens to help them defeat Sparta. When they “signed” their alliance with Athens they asked for earth and water, which really meant that Athens would belong to Persia. Athens was unaware of what they were really signing so when they said they don’t need Persia anymore. This infuriated Darius and wanted to burn Athens to the ground. They would have to decide first of all weather they would go in for an amphibious campaign or a land campaign. Athens was their main …show more content…
Which the Athenian army would take positions in the Vrana valley because Miltiades knew that was the only way to get to Athens. So using METT-TC they would set up in the valley like a corkscrew on a bottle. The phalanx being their tactics they knew they could defend it from there because of the steep mountains protecting their flanks from the Persian cavalry. The Persian army would start with firing a barrage of arrows at the Greek army which would do little damage to them because of their heavy shields protected them from the waves of arrows. Next the Persians would send light infantry into the valley but the phalanx once and using the terrain would prove to be paramount and the Athenians were able to push them back. Miltiades would now have to make a move to be risky which was he had to push out of the valley. He then thinned out the center to reinforce the flanks which he did this to try to cover from side to side of the valley but this is also why he had to push out. The reason is if he didn’t do that when the center would get hit it would flex and if broken they would be surrounded and then defeated. This was risky for Miltiades to do this but he thought about his flanks most of all because he knew that was his weak area. When they came out of the valley to face the Persian force the Athenians starting running about 400 meters which would make them exhausted wearing 70 pounds worth of gear. They stopped about 100 meters and reestablished their phalanx. When the Persian infantry started to attack which was pushing the thinned out center of the Athens force back. At first it seemed like the risky move they made was not going to pay off. The heavily armored flanks were winning because it was common practice for the Persians to put their best fighters in the center and their weaker ones on the flanks. This would be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the Ionian Revolt of 499 BC, the Persians and their king Darius wanted to take control Greece. Persia wanted to extend its territory. And the Greeks had helped the Ionians to revolt against the Persians, and had marched to Sardis and burned the city. The Battle of Marathon took place in 490 BC during the first Persian invasion of Greece. It was fought between the citizens of Athens, helped by Plataea, and a Persian force commanded by Datis and Artaphernes.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miltiades biggest contribution was to the battle at Marathon which was considered a significant impact on the Persian wars. It was in the battle at Marathon where he showed both witt and skill against the Persian army. He was considered valuable to the athenians because of his former close relations with the Persian army, which meant he knew there tactics and there ways to which they fought in battle. The Athenians made Miltiades 10th Commander to which each day starting from commander one every commander would be given a chance to be in charge of the army. It was Miltiades who saw the fact that the Persian cavalary wasnt their as an advantage and to which could result in victory if the Athenian army attacked early. So Miltiades convinced Calimuchus the Polemarh to confront the Persian army and give him command. Miltiades battle tactics were both thoughtful and strategic as he used what he had learnt about the Persians against them with both ingenious and thoughful ideas. He made use of the terrain by placing his army on the top of the hill so that they had the higher ground and the best spot for when they made there way down hill so they were less tired and exhausted. It was said to be Miltiades who convinced the generals not to use their customary tactics of which hoplites (soldiers of greek cities) normally marched in an evenly distributed phanlanx of shields and spears. Miltiades was the one who had this great idea of attacking while the cavalary was not around. He knew that the Persians had there flanks set out that the strongest soldiers where in the middle of th e flank and the weakest on the outer flanks, so Miltiades devised this cunning plan to swap it around for his army. He made the strongest soldiers as the outer flanks and the weakest in the middle, so when it came to the fight the strongest soldiers could encirle the persian flanks and cause them distress and penick. His other contribution in the battle at Marathon tactics was the fact that he knew…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Persian Wars were a series of conflicts fought between the Greek states and the Persian Empire from 500-449 BC. It started in 500 BC, when a few Greek city-states on the coast of Asia Minor, who were under the control of the Persian Empire, revolted against the despotic rule of the Persian king Darius. Athens and Eretria in Euboea gave aid to these Greek cities but not enough, and they were subdued by the Persians. The Persians became determined to conquer Hellas and make Athens and Eretria pay for helping the Ionian cities. In 492 BC, the first Persian invasion had its fleet crippled by a storm before it could do any damage. King Darius sent another Persian expedition in 490 which destroyed Eretria and then faced the Athenians at the battle of Marathon. The Persian were defeated and forced to return home. Darius died before his preparations for a third invasion were completed, but they were continued by Xerxes I, his son and successor. In 480, Xerxes reached Greece with a tremendous army and navy. The Persian land forces had to pass through the narrow pass of Thermopylae, which was defended by the Spartan Leonidas. His small contingent held back the Persians but were eventually defeated. The Persians continued on to Athens, which had been abandoned, and burned it. The Athenians had fled with their fleet to the island of Salamis where they met up with other Greek forces. Shortly afterward, the Persians followed and were defeated in a sea battle off of Salamis. Xerxes returned to Persian but left a military force in Greece which was defeated in 479 BC at Plataea by a Greek army under the Spartan Pausanias, ending the threat of the Persians once and for all. (1)…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Situated at a narrow pass between mountains and the sea, Thermopylae provided a natural bottleneck that limited the numerical advantage of the Persian forces. This geographical advantage became a linchpin for the Greeks, allowing them to deploy their superior hoplite tactics effectively. The Phalanx formation, a hallmark of Greek military strategy, proved instrumental in withstanding the initial Persian onslaught and inflicting heavy casualties, showcasing the strategic brilliance of the Greek commanders. Heroic Stand of the…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assess the reasons for the victory of the Greeks in the Second Persian War (480–479 BC).…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The number they had at each side was Persians (the best troops)- 40,000, Medes- 20,000, Bactrians, Indians & Sacae- 20,000, and Pro-Persian Greeks- 50,000. The commanders of each force were Darius, Xerxes, Mardonius. The Greeks got together a big army and marched to Peloponnesus. The Persians retreated then camped near Boeotia, until their supply went lower each passing day. Mardonius thought Greeks were going to retreat so he told his men to go full force.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Battle of Plataea

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * In the summer of 479 BC, the Greeks assembled a huge army (by contemporary standards), and marched out of the Peloponnesus. The Persians retreated to Boeotia, and built a fortified camp near Plataea. The Greeks, however, refused to be drawn into the prime cavalry terrain around the Persian camp, resulting in a stalemate that lasted eleven days. However, whilst attempting a retreat after their supply lines were disrupted, the Greek battle-line fragmented. Thinking the Greeks in full retreat, Mardonius ordered his forces to pursue them, but the Greeks (particularly the Spartans, Tegeans and Athenians) halted and gave battle, routing the lightly armed Persians infantry and killing Mardinous…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spartans defended a strategic spot called the Pass of Thermopylae which was a narrow path about 50 feet wide with steep mountains surrounding it (flawlesslogic.com). This made it almost impossible for the Persian troops to penetrate.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The beginning of the war between the Persians and Greeks dates back nearly 15 years beforehand in 494 BC, at the Ionian revolt. During this time and age, the Persian Empire is a huge world power and have conquered a majority of the ancient world. Ionia is a small area of land off the coast of present day Turkey, near Greece. It had already been conquered by the Persian Empire, and was populated by Greeks. The Ionians revolted against the Persian rule and called for assistance from Greece. Out of the many polis’ in Greece, Athens was the only one to step in to aid them. They fought valiantly, but their revolt was quickly crushed to discourage any more rebellions. To even further discourage the people under their rule from revolting, King Darius of Persia decided to destroy the city of Athens as well, in order to teach everyone else a lesson not to oppose the great Persian Empire. In 490 BC, he sent 20,000 men across the sea to Greece, and they land in the city of Marathon. Persia demanded Greece to surrender but they would agree to their terms. The message the Greeks sent to the invading Persians stated, “We know you are a…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greco-Persian wars were arrangement of mayhem that began in 499 BC and endured in 449 BC. The arrangement of wars includes the Greek's political space and the Persian Realm. This started in 547 BC, when Cyrus the Incomparable attempted to overcome Iona, in light of the help sent by Athens and Eretria. Athens and Eretria succeeded in catching and blazing the territorial capital of Persia, Sardis. Be that as it may, they were constrained to pull back as a result of their overwhelming misfortunes. In view of this, Ruler Darius I, the Persian lord, pledged to blaze these two Greek locales. When the Ionian rebellion finished, Lord Darius started his arrangements in vanquishing Greece. He started his plot in 490 BC and effectively vanquished Eretria. He then sent his troops to Athens who arrived in a straight close to the Marathon, a town in Athens. It was additionally around the same time when Athens settled on a choice to stand up to the Persian domineering jerks and assault instead of just…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pheidippides a runner for the Athenians sent message to Sparta help them fight the large Persian force. In response the Spartans said they will not help until their religious festival is over which was when the moon was full (in 10 days). Herodotus states (6.110) that Miltiades was the general that gained the deciding vote from Callimachus to fight the Persians without waiting for the Spartans. Herodotus does not say why the Athenians choose to attack the Persians but with no mention of the Persians cavalry during the battle we can suspect it is because the Persians split up there force for a separate attack. This would then favour the Athenians planax formation as it is weak to cavalry so it would make them decide the face the Persians.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ten years later, Darius’ son Xeroxes carried on his father’s plans to take on Greece after his death. This time, the powerful army of Sparta joined with the Athenians. The Athenians sent their navy to attack the Persians by sea while the Spartans were at the narrow mountain pass of Thermopylae. The Persians had to go through the Spartans in order to get to the mainland in a timely manner. Luckily for the Persians, a traitorous Greek soldier led them to another pass that would allow them to attack the Spartans from behind. This allowed them to burn the city of Athens and…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leonidas

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leonidas handpicked 300 men to take with him to the Thermopylae, he was sent “in order that the sight of them might encourage the other confederates to fight and prevent them from going over to the enemy”. Leonidas as a young boy had been trained mentally and physically to fight in preparation to become a hoplite warrior, as a military leader handpicking his 300 men would have been a tactic used to find the strongest Spartan men who he trusted. The 300 Spartan men would have been equipped with a round shield, spear and iron short sword. In battle they used a formation called the phalanx in which rows if hoplites stood directly next to each so shields overlapped with one another. When the Persians attacked from the side and back of the phalanx, the Spartan formation would have been vulnerable which proved to be Leonidas weakness against the invading army. Leonidas although had a strong 300 Spartans he did not have enough tactics and men to stop a strong Persian army in battle, which limited his contribution to the Persian war.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Sparta beats Demaratus and his army that war will be the most memorable war fought in history during that time. During that time of the battle, the Persian army was not doing as expected even though they had renewed their onslaught hope they could defeat the badly hurt and dismembered Greek army. The Greeks used tactics that the Persians were not ready for by using waves of…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soldier's in Battle

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Chapter-2 the author has discussed the Greeks defense of their homeland against the Persian invader Emperor Xerxes in a mountain pass called Thermopylae. A Spartan Leonidas stopped with 7000 men out of whom were 300 Spartans who were trained to be soldiers since the age of seven. Leonidas command proved fatal for Xerxes and resulted in his defeat.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays