Preview

What Is The Cause Of The Battle Of Marathon

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1293 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Cause Of The Battle Of Marathon
The Battle of Marathon happened in 490 BC and lead to the rise of the city of Athens and the fall of the Persian Empire. The cause of the battle was the The Ionian Revolt which happened in 499-493 BC, the story is that Histiaeus didn’t like his long exile beyond the Tigris and wanted to go back to Ionia. He sent a message to Aristagoras on the head of a slave to tell him to start a rebellion. The Ionians got help from the Athenians but they saw the revolt was going to fail so left after they had burnt down Sardis according to Herodotus (5.102-5.103). This lead Darius to want be reminded of the Athenians so he could seek revenge as shown by Herodotus with the quote (6.94) “exhorted by his servant ‘remember the Athenians,’”. In 490 BC Darius …show more content…
Pheidippides a runner for the Athenians sent message to Sparta help them fight the large Persian force. In response the Spartans said they will not help until their religious festival is over which was when the moon was full (in 10 days). Herodotus states (6.110) that Miltiades was the general that gained the deciding vote from Callimachus to fight the Persians without waiting for the Spartans. Herodotus does not say why the Athenians choose to attack the Persians but with no mention of the Persians cavalry during the battle we can suspect it is because the Persians split up there force for a separate attack. This would then favour the Athenians planax formation as it is weak to cavalry so it would make them decide the face the Persians. During mid battle “the barbarians were victorious” but the two wings containing Athenians and Plataeans defeated the Persians(6.113). Herodotus (6.117) states that 6,400 barbarians died and only 192 Athenians during the battle but it is hard to trust his numbers as he can be bias and exaggerate the numbers but he is the most accurate source about the battle we have so you can clearly see the limitations of the texts. The Persians then fled back to Asia ,the Spartans who arrived too late but praised Athenians for their great feat then went home and the Athenians celebrated this victory for many years …show more content…
You see how important the battle was to the Athenians culturally, socially and politically through the artwork, plays, and buildings still 30 years after the battle. The temple of Nike is an ionic acropolis entrance in Athens as it shows the significance of battle of Marathon to the Athenians culturally. The Athenians building the temple in such a sacred place on the acropolis in Athens for all to see shows the significance of the battle and victory for them. Building it there was a massive honor for the god Nike as the land was very scared and not many temples were built there as shown on the map of acropolis. The chosen site shows you the Athenians want to remember the victory for many generations and they are proud of this victory as they built it as their entrance. In being victorious against the Persians and building the temple in honor of Nike the goddess of victory you see that it was important being victorious in the battle of Marathon as it became a part of their culture to be remembered for generations to come. In honoring Nike you see how big of an influence the gods had on the Athenians and how important religion actually is for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae started out in the late summer of 480 B.C, the Spartan King Leonidas 1 held out for three days with a mere 300 hoplites against thousands upon thousands of the best Great King’s troops. Under thirty-five Persian generals, were assembled for the invasion of Greece, five whom where sons of the royal house. On the arrival of Xerxes at Thermopylae, he saw the that place was defended by a large of number of Spartans, and about seven thousand hoplites from other states, commanded by the Spartan King Leonidas.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of thermopylae was an important battle for both the persian and greek army, the leader of the persian fleet was Xerxes whose army was far more larger than King Leonidas, leader of the Greek army, but Leonidas was a far more tactical and smarter war general than Xerxes.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae is shrouded in fluctuating estimations and conflicting historic accounts. There is as much myth, legend and mystery surrounding the actual battle as we have historical records for it. Historians from ancient Greece were very biased and so we must find a middle ground between accounts to have an educated opinion of what really happened. The most speculation involves the actual numbers and count of each side; the Greek forces and the Persian forces. Greek accounts say the Persians numbered over a million. Herodotus even exclaims the Persian forces reached up to 2.6 million strong. We know today that this would hardly have been possible and that Herodotus had probably greatly exaggerated in his writings to glorify the Greeks.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Herodotus, the Greek army did not have enough troops to maintain the Persians troops so they were heavily outnumbered this lead to the Persians surround the Greek Force. A major factor on the defeat of the defeat of the Greeks was of the disunity of the Greek states.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Athenian army, led by the Athenian general Miltiades who decided to attack with a new tactic. Miltiades had his troops stretch out in a line as long as the Persian army. This tactic weakened his center but strengthened the wings.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While strongest at the front, the phalanx's main weakness was on the right flank and to the rear. Once engaged in battle the heavy armor and close quarters did not allow the phalanx to easily address attacks from either of those directions. Although the battle of Thermopylae was a decisive Persian victory, the employment of the phalanx formation proved to be a useful and superior strategy there as roughly fourteen hundred Hoplite led by King Leonidas and three hundred Spartans held their ground for a week (three spent fighting) halting Persian advancement and causing numerous casualties. Were it not for a traitor exposing a path to the rear of the Greek positionallowing the Persian forces to surround the Greek position, there's no way of knowing how long this small force could have fought or whether or not they could have been victorious.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle Of Thermoplyae

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When this attack didn’t work Xerxes sent 10,000 men known as the Medes, to attack the Spartans and capture them. The Spartans were positioned along the wall, shoulder to shoulder and shield to shield. This method allowed them to defend themselves and not be captured by the Persians. The Medes were no match for the Spartan soldiers. In the next…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greek offensive, although contributed to Miltiades as a brilliant strategic decision, is an important historiographical issue for modern historians. Herodotus tells us that opinion among the Athenian commanders was divided with some opposed to attacking with their heavily outnumbered force. Others, especially Miltiades supported an offensive strategy. Miltiades is credited with persuading the war archon Callimachus through a stirring speech to cast his deciding vote in favour of an offensive strategy. Herodotus in his narrative has Miltiades say ‘If we refuse to fight, I have little doubt that the result will be bitter”. However it has also been suggested that the Greek offensive was based on the apparent absence of the Persian cavalry which Herodotus fails to mention. This is puzzling as most modern historians acknowledge that a Persian cavalry force had already disembarked from the fleet onto land and Herodotus said the Persians chose Marathon because it was “the best ground for cavalry to manoeuvre in.”. It has also been assumed that Miltiades deployed the Greek phalanx with strong wings and a weak centre, a strategy that secured…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On thermopylea and platea

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The primary reason that the Greeks were able to claim victory over the Persians during their invasion of Greece was primarily due to the Spartans and more importantly the actions of the 300 Spartans and their king leonidas at the battle of Thermopylae, as it was here at the Pass of Thermopylae that the Spartans and other members of Greek society held off the Persian army outnumbered and outmatched for almost five days straight. This ultimately delayed the advance of the Persian army and allowed for the Greeks to send messengers from Thermopylae to the other Greek city states in order to warn them of the Persian invasion and allow them to amass their armies. Even though the battle of Thermopylae was a Persian victory it did however give the Spartans and other Greeks a chance to prove their might and the main reason they were able to hold out as long as they did was due to their superior battle tactics.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Athens and Sparta, were the strongest cities , Athens and Sparta competed with the supreme political influence of Greece . Athens and Sparta's men always trained to be ready for war. Sparta's main strength lay in its ground troops, while Athens's powerful navy controlled the seas. The tide was turned in the Persian Wars when the legendary 300 Spartans led by King Leonidas slowed Xerxes' advance at Thermopylae. The Persians were later ultimately defeated at the Battle of Salamis by the superior strategy of…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The best manipulation and use of terrain by the Greeks in the Greco-Persian War was at the Battle of Marathon. In the Battle of Marathon Miltiades and his men chopped down trees to block the Persians from going around the Athenian Army. Except for sailing around the coast, this made sure that the Persian army had no other way around to get to Athens; furthermore, this helped make the small battle area an effective choke point. The Greeks decided to fight in the Vrana Valley which was flanked by swamps. This decision was a brilliant idea because the Persians couldn’t take their cavalry through the muddy swamps; consequently, this forced them to have a standoff with the Athenians. This battle was a decisive victory for the Greeks, unlike the…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can you imagine four-thousand spartans charging down a hill while three-thousand Athenians ready their bows and release them all simultaneously while the string whips in the hard rain? The Peloponnesian War was one of the most fierce wars in Greece because many people fell in battle. From the South were the Spartans. Their forces had never been stronger with a reformed, military-based government. From the North was the Athenians who had just been through a war that had been won, and were still armed and battle ready, holding fortresses across Greece. The interactions that these two city states made against, with, and without them were so intense that even the fierce kings, Leonidas of Sparta and King Pericles Cleon Nicias of Athens, fell to each other's armies.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spartans may not have defeated, or stopped the Persians, but here’s what they DID do. They held out for three weeks against an army over 666 times the size of their own. They killed several of the Persian invaders. They killed beasts never known to them before. And they bought some time for our allies to…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite their huge differences, both Sparta and Athens united to fight the Persians together. In the book The Portable Greek Historians by M. I. Finley, Herodotus records, “The Greeks who at this spott awaited the coming of Xerxes were the following: from Sparta, three hundred men-at-arms; from Arcadia, a thousand Tegeans and Mantineans, five hundred of people; a hundred and twenty Orchomenians, from the Arcadian Orchomenus’ and a thousand from other cities,” (Herodotus, The Persian Wars 7.202)....Herodotus continues, “The sea was in good keeping, watched by the Athenians, the Aeginetans, and the rest of the fleet,” (Herodotus, The Persian Wars 7.203). In addition, Herodotus says, “The various nations had each captains of their own under whom they served; but the one to whom all especially looked up, and who had the command of the entire force, was the Lacedaemonian, Leonidas,” (Herodotus, The Persian Wars 7.204). Based off Herodotus’ statements, all the Greeks were waiting upon Xerxes’ arrival. They included Sparta, the strongest military, Arcadia, Tegeans, Mantineans, and more. Also, the Athenians, who had the strongest navy were also accompanied by other Greeks while awaiting the arrival of the Persian navy. These records by Herodotus show the concept of Greek unity or panhellenism as Greeks from all different poleis come together to fight the stronger Persian army who were considered barbarians or outsiders. The Persians were coming to conquer Athen but all other Greek poleis refused to let Athens battle alone. Even having significant differences the Greeks appointed Spartan king Leonidas as head of command. They recognized that Sparta had the best army at the time and Leonidas was the best choice for command. Athenians and Spartans have very significant differences but in this battle they united…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays