Preview

Tanglewood Case 5: Disparate Impact Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2910 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tanglewood Case 5: Disparate Impact Analysis
Tanglewood Case 5: Disparate Impact Analysis

Recruitment and Selection
HRM 450

Current Needs Assessment Tanglewood prides itself on encouragement of diversity in the workplace. All hiring and promotion decisions should be made on the basis of character and quality of work. The ensuing lawsuit brings about a need to analyze Tanglewood’s selection strategies to ensure these practices are not hindering the promotion of diversity. In order to do this, it is necessary to study the flow and concentration statistics of the organization. Flow statistics are calculated by comparing the number of people hired and promoted in the organization with the total number of people that apply. These statistics are then divided into different groups (i.e. race, gender). The selection rates of the different groups are compared to determine if there is a significant difference in selection between the groups. An example of this would be to look at the number of total white applicants and the percentage of those applicants that were hired. Then, look at the total number of African American applicants and the percentage of those applicants that were hired. These two percentages must then be compared. A useful comparison of these percentages would require that the number of African Americans selected equal 80% or the number of white employees hired. This is known as the four-fifth’s rule. The Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP) requires that all organizations keep records that will allow for calculation and comparison of these statistics. The UGESP also requires that the four-fifth’s rule be calculated in all organizations. If is it shown that “a selection rate for any…group is less than four-fifths (4/5) (or eighty percent) of the rate of for the group with the highest rate” then this will usually be considered to be evidence of adverse impact. Adverse (or disparate) impact occurs when staffing practices have potential discriminatory impact on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is very important that diversity exists in order for an organization to be successful. Tanglewood should consider active diversity so that it aligns with the labor market. Diversity satisfies both legal and moral perspectives of an organization. The more diverse an organization the more diverse service it can provide its…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tanglewood promotes diversity in the workplace, and all hiring and promotion are made on the basis of character and quality of work. The ensuing lawsuit brings a need to analyze Tanlgewood’s selection methods to ensure these are not against the promotion of diversity.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The disparate impact theory requires a plaintiff to demonstrate that an apparently neutral employment practice affects one group more harshly than another and that the practice is not justified by business necessity. A prima face case is established when the plaintiff identifies a specific employment practice to be challenged; and through relevant statistical analysis proves that the challenged practice has an adverse impact on a protected group. When it comes to the case, discrimination was seen, but never affects more than one…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The plaintiff disparate (adverse) impact claim failed because this type of philosophy involves the plaintiff proving that the employment practice was more severely on one set of individuals than another, and the practice is not justified by business necessity. A prima face case is recognized when: (1) the plaintiff perceives a certain employment practice to be tested; and (2) through appropriate statistical investigation and revealing that the test practice has an adverse impact on a certain group. Mr. Dunlap did not present clues that the practices used in his conversation was used for other employment results, and no statistical evidence proof can display that a secure set of people was adversely impacted. There was no confirmation at trial in regards to TVA hiring practices and the only scenarios recognized was the Cumberland committee interrogations and scoring of the applications during the Dunlap’s interviewing process. Furthermore,…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tanglewood Case 6

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages

    As you learned in the third case, Tanglewood is working to improve the quality of their selection systems. The process of assessing selection methods initiated by Marilyn Anchley was not limited to store associates—it also covered department managers, assistant store managers, and store managers. Although the method of using an increasing number of tests and forms was generally seen as an adequate update to the process for hiring entry level employees, store managers agree that this is not a sufficiently rigorous method for selecting department managers.…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The continuation of the application of affirmative action in the labor market. “Affirmative action is one of the most controversial government interventions in the labor market since the abolition of slavery.”(Jonathan Leonard) Affirmative action pertaining to the labor market takes a very different stance. Under Executive Order 11246 (part of the Civil Rights Act), “ you are not to discriminate against any employee because of race, color, religion and sex, as well as take affirmative action to ensure that there is a diversity of employees”. The contradiction of this statement is astonishing, and to have that nailed in the coffin known as our Constitution, is the ultimate blow on the use of this policy in the workplace. The fact that we must not consider race, but consider it in terms of diversity is overall a confusing concept and forced employers to establish ‘quotas’ to meet racial goals. This is very beneficial for white collar or craft jobs, where employers are hesitant to hire minorities or women because they do not believe they can handle the burden of the job. This maybe one of the only circumstances where federal pressure is advantageous, and statistics show that establishments are growing to give more job openings specially for african americans, hispanics and other minorities, decreasing its 89% white-hiring percentage. The effects of these kinds of policies are significant on a 99% confidence level or better, and have resulted in better representation in establishments(especially minority females) and also benefit companies in their own employment growth. However, these job openings are mainly in unskilled positions reducing the production of specially-skilled members of society, and basically producing only white specialties. Studied by Ashenfelter and Heckman(1976), taking african americans as an…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disparate treatment is discrimination where the employer treats some individuals less favorably than others because of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Adverse impact refers to the total employment process that result in a significantly higher percentage of a protected group in the candidate population being rejected for employment, promotion and placement. Affirmative Action rules and programs are tools in place where extra efforts are made to hire and promote qualified women, minorities and individuals with disabilities…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eeoc Answers

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Rule of thumb followed by the EEOC in determining adverse impact for use in enforcement proceedings.…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disparate impact happens when an employer uses a facially neutral employment practice that has an adverse impact on members of a protected class. If the negative impact affects the protected group more harshly than the majority group, discrimination may be found. Practices that may be considered discriminatory are placement tests, aptitude tests, height and weight requirements or any other screening device that causes more than 20 percent of a protected group to fail the test. For example, 100 men and 100 women take an exam for a promotion. 90 of the women pass the test but only 45 of the men pass the test. The relevant ratio would be 45/90, or 50 percent, which would violate the 80 percent rule. Because the men did not pass at a rate of 80…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bus Mgt 210

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., & ... Thomas, D. (2003). THE EFFECTS OF DIVERSITY ON BUSINESS PERFORMANCE: REPORT OF THE DIVERSITY RESEARCH NETWORK. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3-21. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.…

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are likely law enforcement agencies in this county who have the same phrase in their application solely because it mitigates the chances of their hiring practices being challenged in court under Title VII. These agencies may not have any allegiance to the principal or goal of the statement; nor have any real intentions to hire those applicants. In many departments the standardization of hiring processes seeks to prevent personal biases and favoritism. However, these standardized processes and tests have also drawn criticism, with some claiming a disparate impact being present often either in the construction of the test or variances in the minimum qualifications.” Disparate impact is…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employment discrimination occurs when an employee is rebuked based on factors that have no bearing on job performance. Traits such as race, religion, gender, and national origin are all elements that can be the basis of discrimination in hiring, firing, promotion, and other employment decisions. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act integrates the two principles of disparate treatment and disparate impact. Disparate treatment is when an employee is treated differently due to the factors mentioned above. Whereas disparate impact specifies the broader scope of employer policies that yield a negative impact on many employees with the traits mentioned above.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One would think that the employee selection process would be simple, but it is not. Two cases will demonstrate what is not, and what the correct way to approach a hiring situation is. There are specific ways to handle each situation that will minimize the risk to the company during the selection process. These alternative solutions will prevent the companies from ending up in court for discrimination in the hiring process.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    interview

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The company has a diversity program that monitors, the ratio in which employees are hired to help prevent inequality in staff.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. The Commission conciliates the application to try to have the parties resolve it amongst themselves.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays