Preview

Task 2

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1094 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Task 2
Task 2

Scenario

Andy saw Bilal standing at a bus stop as he drove past. Andy immediately stopped his car and, in an aggressive manner, ran over to Bilal shouting racist abuse and accusing him (falsely) of being involved in the kidnapping of a child. Andy then punched Bilal, knocking him to the ground. Andy then hit Bilal repeatedly with a rubbish bin which Andy ripped from the bus stop. Bilal’s injuries included a fractured cheekbone and jaw, and severe cuts to his face from which he lost a lot of blood. Bilal needed major surgery to rebuild his face.

Report explaining the different offences for which Andy is likely to face prosecution.

In relation to Bilal’s injuries of a fractured cheekbone and jaw as well as severe cuts to his face, I believe that Andy will be charged with S.18 GBH under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. S.18 is an indictable offence, which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. However it could be argued that before Andy attacked Bilal, Andy caused Bilal to fear being attacked which comes under Section 39 Offences against the Person Act 1861 so could be charged with this offence as well as S.18.

Andy will face criminal liability for assault contrary to S39 Criminal Justice Act 1998. R v Logdon confirms that Andy must through his own actions or words cause Bilal to fear that unlawful force will be immediately used against him. This can be actions such as showing the gun in Logdon and/or words such a Logdon threatening to keep his victim hostage. Here, Andy has satisfied this requirement by shouting racial abuse at Bilal and accusing him of kidnapping.
Such fear must be of immediate force as seen in Smith v Chief Superintendent of Woking Police Station where the defendant’s threat to the victim was imminent enough by him being in the garden. Here, Bilal's fear was of immediate force because Andy got out the car aggressively then shouted racial abuse at Bilal and falsely accused him of kidnapping a young child. The fact

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    After Bilal Skaf had finished this act, he allowed and encouraged another man who wished to engage with the woman and the man proceeded to have sexual intercourse with the female. This constitutes the second offence charged against Bilal Skaf as being there as an aider and abettor.…

    • 2795 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the morning of Sunday 21st April 1996, a young Hobart man, Martin Bryant armed himself with three high powered automatic firearms and a large quantity of ammunition and then drove to Port Arthur. North of Port Arthur, he entered the home of a couple he briefly met as a child. Inside he started his rampage, shooting them both. Once he arrived at the Historical Site Port Arthur he ate a meal at the Broad Arrow Café. He then waited till his meal was finished to take his rifle from his bag and began to indiscriminately shoot around the crowded Cafe. Within the first 90 seconds, 20 people had died and 12 were injured. The man then moved to the adjacent car park, where he shot and killed four more people and added to the toll of injured people as well. After shooting at people in the grounds of the Historic Site, he maneuvered into his car and drove up the former main entrance road to the original toll booth. In this area, seven more people were killed in two separate incidents, during which he stole a victim’s car and abandoned his own. Driving north to a General Store, he killed another person and took one hostage then drove back to the place of his first killings, firing random shots at vehicles along the way. At the house, he continued to set fire to the stolen car and then took his hostage inside. Through the afternoon and night, shots were fired at police officers on the scene. At some point during this time, Bryant killed the hostage. When morning arrived, he set fire to the house and was captured by police as he fled. By the time the incidents had finished he had killed 35 people and injured 18. . Bryant had 72 criminal charges pressed against him and 551 witness statements were entered. After initially pleading “not guilty” to 72 charges, his plea was changed after conversations with his lawyer. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with no eligibility for parole on all 35 murder charges, plus 21 years for each of the remaining counts of the indictment.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first and foremost issue to be noted in this case is that of Francis carelessly shooting his gun in the direction of Nigel and also that of Nigel responding and in turn shooting towards Francis. Had Francis not fired his gun towards Nigel could there be a possibility that Nigel would not in turn shoot back at Francis causing Aiden to be wounded in the crossfire? Was Francis acting in this manner due to provocation from Nigel? Could it also be possible that Nigel reacted and shot back at Francis in self defence with the fear of being shot himself driving him? Could Nigel have fired back due to provocation from Francis? If these initial events had not happened is it possible that Aiden would still be alive today? Upon deciding to bring the victim to hospital, Nigel criticized Francis’s method of carrying Aiden (an issue which is not in clear violation of any law) leading to Francis abandoning Aiden and leaving the scene and Nigel carrying the victim in a very poor manner back towards to car. Had Francis continued carrying Aiden to the car, would this had meant that his medical condition would not have deteriorated due to poor care carried out by Nigel afterwards? Even though Francis did not shoot Aiden, would the fact that he assumed a liable role to help bring the victim to hospital, though not legally obliged to do so, but then decided to leave half way through render him guilty of breaking a law because he did not carry out the act of choosing to assist a victim in need of medical care to the best of his…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    essay for NFO in law

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First of all there is a battery with the initial contact that Jameela has on Ken. The AR of battery is “infliction of unlawful violence”. Battery is defined as being the slightest touch without permission as in the case of Cole v Turner, the knocking in to Ken is this touch without his permission. When she knocked into Ken this led to him to fall. This is an ABH as this battery led to further damage with Ken falling down. The AR of ABH is “common assault occasioning in actual bodily harm”. Miller defines this as “any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the v”, in which the falling down would cause Ken to experience some discomfort with falling to the ground. However this fall resulted in Ken breaking his hip. This is a GBH S20 as this break would have caused him to go to hospital. The AR of GBH S20 is “causing wound or GBH”. There isn’t a wound and therefore there is only grievous bodily harm. The case of Smith defines grievous as meaning really serious harm which includes broken bones. The case of Bollom states that the seriousness of the harm scales with the age of the victim, as Ken in this scenario is elderly man the seriousness of the fall was serious as his body is weaker and therefore there is more damage that is done, affecting the graveness of the injury. Therefore the AR of GBH S20 has been established.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ABH is a triable either way offence that could be tried in either the magistrates or Crown court. It carries a maximum punishment of 5 years in prison. The actus reus is either that the defendant committed the actus reus of assault or battery and that the assault or battery caused actual bodily harm.…

    • 3114 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    NFO Criticisms

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The majority of non-fatal offences are included in the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA) which was described by Professor JC Smith as ‘a rag bag of offences brought together from a variety of sources’. This view is widely shared throughout the legal system, although some argue that the law works in practise and so no reform is needed. However the law does not include the common offences of Assault and Battery, providing another call for reform. The first Bill to reform this act was put forward in the 1980s, along with more drafts in 1990s, which shows the Law Commission’s dedication to modernising the Act. Despite these obvious intentions no government has passed it as of yet.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TASK 3

    • 329 Words
    • 1 Page

    In my opinion, one of the many benefits of using spreadsheet to Fireball Technology company is it allows the company to carry out simple or complicated calculations using numerical data and formulae. The many functions Microsoft Excel provides such as tools to analyze and visualize data sets in accessible ways. If you have a set of data statistical, numerical or financial information, you can use a spreadsheet not only to store this data but also to manage it, perform analytical processing on it and present it. Spreadsheets provide complex processing in ways that even people with little technical experience can access.…

    • 329 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Unit 03 Aqa

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Malicious Wounding or Inflicting Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH): s20 Offences against the Person Act 1861…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Task 1

    • 2863 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Managing Organizations and Leading People Task 1 Dustin Fogt
Western Governor's University Managing Organizations and Leading People BIP 2…

    • 2863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did He Commit Crime

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He did not just happen upon her by chance. As he was banging on the door and cursing he was also acting in a disorderly and threatening manner. By lunging at her twice, he committed the crime of assault. Even though he did not physically strike her the act of lunging towards her constitutes an assault. Furthermore, since the two had a prior dating relationship, had children together, and based on his actions and the circumstances he also committed an…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rape In Scots Law

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    HM Advocate , the charges were rape and assault with intent to ravish. Fraser having intercourse with the complainer by deceiving her that he was her husband. Fraser objected to the charges, due to the absence of force and that the complainer did not refuse to consent. The court agreed and the objection was sustained because of the absence of force. Lord Cockburn stated that consent, was actually given, albeit mistakenly and only withdrawn after the act, when the deceit was apparent. In Sweenie v. HM Advocate Lord Abdmillan’s opinion stated that force is an essential element in the crime of rape. He also stated that it must be force employed to overcome will. Lord Cowan concurs stating the act must have been perpetrated forcibly. The charge of rape was dropped due to the absence of force. Both Fraser and Sweenie set the precedents with regards to needing force and actual refusal of consent for the charge of rape. HM Advocate v. Grainger regards consent. The accused claimed the crime cannot be committed unless a woman is in a condition, physically and mentally, to exercise her willpower and offer resistance. The complainer was highly intoxicated and unable to give or refuse consent. Lord Anderson stated this contention seems to me to be well founded and on that basis the charge of rape was dropped. Barbour v. HM Advocate the complainer did not offer any physical resistance; normally this was a requirement that showed the accused overcame the will…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Task 1

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Over the centuries there have been many different environmental and geographical factors that have shaped the development of the United States. Two of these factors that I feel are extremely significant to this development are the Irish Potato Famine and the discovery of gold in California. The Irish Potato Famine began in Ireland in September 1845. The famine was caused by an airborne fungus, phytophthora infetans, which attacks the leaves of the plant, turning them black, causing them to curl and rot, ultimately killing the plant. The rotting plant makes the perfect environment for the fungus to multiply. The wind then carries the fungus spores to more healthy plants. (Irish Potato Famine, 2000) This famine caused such dire conditions for the families. The main source of food and income withered away before their eyes. Since families could not make ends meet, half-a-million people were evicted from their homes. The landlords used a method of getting rid of their poor tenants by promising them food, money and prosperity in America. The families left with nowhere to go fell for the empty promises and migrated to America. The famine caused around 650,000 Irish emigrants to come to America in huge waves. 52,000 arrived in New York City in 1847 alone. (Irish Potato Famine, 2000) The California Gold Rush began in January 1848, when gold was discovered in the American River near present day Sacramento by James Marshall. News of this discovery traveled to New York City. In August 1848 the New York Herald announced the discovery, kicking off the migration west with dreams of striking in rich in California. By December 1949, San Francisco’s population jumped to 100,000. Prior to the Gold Rush, California’s population was 25,000, but by 1852 the total population was 223,856. This population growth ensured California’s incorporation into the United States of America as the 31st state and the first western state. As a result,…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Task 1

    • 2610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Describe the type of business, purpose and ownership of two different businesses. Describe the different stakeholders who influence the purpose of the two different businesses.…

    • 2610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Task 1

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arose from the green paper “Every Child Matters” and identifies five outcomes for all children.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    ASSAULT

    • 2985 Words
    • 10 Pages

    A mere omission to act cannot constitute an assault unless it is part of a continuing act (Fagan).…

    • 2985 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays