She has paid her due, put in the hard work. But instead of vetting her objectively, the so-called Berniebots or Berniebros (who are mainly inexperienced young people behind the unsuccessful “Occupy Wall Street” movement) have joined and/or fueled by clandestine conservative groups to mount attacks on the credibility of the former Secretary. It is indeed sickening to hear arguments against Hillary Clinton as being a hawk and other disingenuous criticism of policies she worked on while at the State Dept. People seem to forget that even as head of the State Dept., whatever policy she advocates is subject to the president’s approval. How can we justifiably separate her from the president she worked for? When you criticize her stewardship at the State Dept., one is effectively saying Obama is the same. But that is not what we’ve been hearing is
She has paid her due, put in the hard work. But instead of vetting her objectively, the so-called Berniebots or Berniebros (who are mainly inexperienced young people behind the unsuccessful “Occupy Wall Street” movement) have joined and/or fueled by clandestine conservative groups to mount attacks on the credibility of the former Secretary. It is indeed sickening to hear arguments against Hillary Clinton as being a hawk and other disingenuous criticism of policies she worked on while at the State Dept. People seem to forget that even as head of the State Dept., whatever policy she advocates is subject to the president’s approval. How can we justifiably separate her from the president she worked for? When you criticize her stewardship at the State Dept., one is effectively saying Obama is the same. But that is not what we’ve been hearing is