Preview

Teamwork and Leadership: Approaches, Challenges, and Best Practice

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1805 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Teamwork and Leadership: Approaches, Challenges, and Best Practice
In today’s organisational world, success is dependent on the quality of the employees’ skills, efforts, and innovation. There are varying approaches to gather these employees on a team, usually headed by a leader. On that note, Marcousé (2005 p. 234) states that “[l]eadership, at its best, means inspiring staff to achieve demanding goals.”However, leader types and team structures can face a number of challenges which restrict positive outcomes. This can be prevented by attaining best practice, which is “a ‘set’ a human resources practices that have the potential to enhance organisational performances when implemented”(Beardwell, 2007 p. 669). Hence, with the various existing approaches on leadership and teamwork come challenges which can be avoided if the limiting factors are controlled to create a well-operating team.

People in the organisations implement various types of leadership. However the main ones that are likely to be introduced nowadays are autocratic, democratic or paternalistic types.
Autocratic leaders run things their own way without taking into consideration what their subordinates feel about certain aspects of the business. They have a clear idea of how they want a task to be completed and therefore do not include employees in the decision-making process. Leaders which use the autocratic approach do not delegate responsibilities to the team members and prefer to stay in control over the business. (Malcolm Surridge, 2005, p.181)
Alternatively, paternalistic leaders are open to the opinions of their subordinates and allow for dialogue between people on the higher lever of hierarchy and the junior staff. However, the leader will still be the one who makes the main decisions. (Malcolm Surridge, 2005, p.182) Leaders who use the democratic approach, however, tend to communicate with the employees down the hierarchy and consider their points of view. They delegate responsibilities within the organisation allowing subordinates to actively participate



Bibliography: Beardwell, J. Claydon, T. Human Resource Management: a contemporary approach. 5 ed. . Great Britain: Prentice Hall, 2007. Print. Belbin, R. Meredith. Management Teams Why they succeed or fail. 3rd. Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2010. Print. Belbin, R. Meredith. Team Roles at Work. 2nd ed. Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2010. Print. Cottrell, Stella. Skills for Success. China: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. Print. Gordon, Judith R. Organizational Behavior A Diagnostic Approach. 7th ed. NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2002. Print. Marcousé, Ian. Business Studies. 5th ed. LDN, UK: Hodder & Stoughton, 2005. Print. Mitchell, Kusy. Toxic Workplace! managing toxic personalities and their systems of power. 1st ed. USA: Jossey-Bass, 2009. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Authoritarian and democratic leadership styles are similar because both of these leaders get to decided what team final say is. But the way that they make the final decision is different because an authoritarian leaders strict and you have to listen to them no matter what they say, because they have the authority over all of the group and whatever this type of leader says is always the final say as you can't argue back. However, a democratic leader is less strict as this type of leader is somebody who gets everybody involved and listens to what they have to say. Although they still have the higher authority but not as much as an authoritarian leader they still have the final say.…

    • 3008 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Management author Resis Likert identifies four patterns of leadership that correspond to the four types of organizational climate. Pattern one of leadership is exploitive. This type of leadership is autocratic and hierarchical, with virtually no participation by members. Leaders make all decisions and show little confidence in others and other members are expected to comply. These types of organizations rarely survive due to people characterizing them by a lack of loyalty. Impoverished leadership is the second leadership pattern which makes some attempt to avoid being completely autocratic. Power remains at the top, but members are given occasional opportunities for participation in the decision-making process. These types of organizations also typically fail due to their lack of benevolence.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ant Colony

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Leadership can be categorized in three different ways. These ways are Authoritarian, Democratic, and Laissez-Faire type leadership. Those who lead in an authoritarian manner are those who give orders and have things done their way and their way only. Democratic leaders strive to gain a consensus from others and are open to others ideas before making there final decisions. A leader who demonstrates laissez-faire type leadership is one who is highly permissive and provides little or no direction and gives others as much freedom as possible.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Services

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    AUTHORITARIAN: This style is also know as Autocratic Leadership, it is a dictatorial method of leading, low concern for followers and high emphasis on task, typically reinforced with threat, punishment, and often ruthless exploitation of workers, who have little or no freedom to resist or desert. This style is used when the leader dictates policies and procedures, decides what goals are to be achieved, and directs and controls all activities without any meaningful participation by the employees.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The structure of an organisation and its operating mechanisms could dictate the style of leadership used. Some organisations desire and encourage contributions from their employees, requiring an open and perhaps a transformational style of leadership, whereas other organisations may demand a more dictatorial style.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ilm level 3

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group. It can also be derived as a dictator, domineering and aggressive behaviour. An autocratic leadership can be beneficial in some circumstances such as that decisions have to be made quickly without consulting anyone, also when projects sometimes require strong leadership so that things can get accomplished quickly and effectively. Some team members may actually prefer the autocratic style this can let the team focus on performing tasks without worrying about the decisions that have to be made, this style of management does have its problems managers / team leaders can learn to use the elements of this style wisely and correctly. As an example autocratic management can be used effectively when the leader has the most knowledge and has access to information that can make the task more productive. This style of management is best used when the team are primarily unskilled workers, casual workers or new starters.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is first important to clarify what the term leadership means. According to Kinicki & Fugate (2012), “leadership is defined as ‘a social influence process in which the leader seeks the voluntary participation of subordinates in an effort to reach organizational goals’” (p. 364). This means leadership involves exercising authority at individual, group, and organizational levels. Bass (2008) identifies positive leadership traits to include task competence, interpersonal competence, intuition, traits of character, biophysical traits, and personal traits. With this basic understanding of leadership, it can be said that the appropriateness of an autocratic leadership style depends on the type of company and situation at hand—the idea of situational leadership (Kinicki & Fugate, 2012, p. 370). Even though the United States is a democratic country, an autocratic leadership style fits some but not all companies, depending on what the company wants to accomplish and what the company’s circumstances are.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Provides clear expectations for what needs to be done, when it should be done, and how it should be done. There is also a clear division between the leader and the followers. Authoritarian leaders make decisions independently with little or no input from the rest of the group. Decision-making is less creative under authoritarian leadership. It is more difficult to move from an authoritarian style to a democratic style than vice versa. Abuse of this style is usually viewed as controlling, bossy, and dictatorial. Authoritarian leadership is best applied to situations…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A critical reflective analysis of my own and my colleague’s performance during our class based teamwork.…

    • 2247 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Working in Teams

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Chong, E. (2007). Role balance and team development: A study of team role characteristics underlying high and low performing teams.. Journalof behavioral & applied management,, 8 (3), 202 217 . Retrieved March 10, 2008, from EBSCOhost database.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership characteristics can be generalized as either autocratic or democratic. The autocratic leader tends to lead by authority and uses coercive power. Oppositely, the democratic leader will delegate authority and use expert and referent power to influence employees. One difference between a mechanistic structure and an organic structure in an organization is the chain of command. Similarly, a difference between an autocratic and a democratic leader is how decisions are made. At the one end of the spectrum, the autocratic side, the manager makes a decision and announces it. This is similar to the mechanistic organizational structure where there is a strict hierarchy of authority and the decision-making is centralized. At the other end of the spectrum, the democratic side, the manager defines limits but lets the group make the decision. This is similar to the organic organizational structure where the decision-making tends to be informal and decentralized within a relaxed hierarchy.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Leadership Continuum model of Tannebaum and Schmidt (1973) suggests that autocratic leaders are more likely to make their own decisions and not engage their subordinates, whereas a more democratic leader (laissez-faire manager) gives subordinates a greater degree of delegation in decision-making.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Autocratic: Managers like to make all the important decisions and closely supervise and control workers. Managers do not trust workers and simply give orders (one-way communication) that they expect to be obeyed. However, it can be effective in certain situations. For example:…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays