Preview

Autocratic Leadership

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Autocratic Leadership
Autocratic Leadership Style
Can an authoritarian/autocratic/directive leadership style be appropriate in American companies currently? If yes/no, why?

It is first important to clarify what the term leadership means. According to Kinicki & Fugate (2012), “leadership is defined as ‘a social influence process in which the leader seeks the voluntary participation of subordinates in an effort to reach organizational goals’” (p. 364). This means leadership involves exercising authority at individual, group, and organizational levels. Bass (2008) identifies positive leadership traits to include task competence, interpersonal competence, intuition, traits of character, biophysical traits, and personal traits. With this basic understanding of leadership, it can be said that the appropriateness of an autocratic leadership style depends on the type of company and situation at hand—the idea of situational leadership (Kinicki & Fugate, 2012, p. 370). Even though the United States is a democratic country, an autocratic leadership style fits some but not all companies, depending on what the company wants to accomplish and what the company’s circumstances are. A manager with an autocratic style of leadership typically does all the decision-making without getting input from his/her subordinates (Rao, 2010, para. 3). Therefore, the manager is the authoritarian while all the subordinates are to simply follow instructions without giving their own thoughts or concerns about the task given to them. A benefit of this style is it can help provide structure and discipline to an otherwise inexperienced team, and also help a team stay on top of strict deadlines. Since the manager makes all the decisions, there is no time “wasted” on decision-making if there’s a time constraint. This type of leadership is also helpful when the manager has the highest amount of knowledge and could therefore specifically guide the subordinates on how to complete a task (Cherry), or when a type of



References: Bass, B.M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press. Cherry, K. Lewin’s leadership styles. About.com: Psychology. Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/leadership Cherry, K. What is autocratic leadership?. About.com: Psychology. Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/leadership Kinicki, A., & Fugate M. (2012). Organizational behavior: Key concepts, skills, and best practices. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Leadership styles: Autocratic leadership. (2008). Leadership-toolbox.com, pp. 3-4. Retrieved from http://www.leadership-toolbox.com/autocratic-leadership.html Rao, M.S. (2010). Is autocratic leadership relevant today?. Chief Learning Officer: Solutions for Enterprise Activity. Retrieved from http://clomedia.com/articles

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Robbins, P. S., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 3836 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article is really enlightening on the way autocratic managers affect their subordinates. I was always under the impression that even though an autocratic leader may be frustrating, they are at least very effective. This article shows that they can be for a while but it brings into perspective the underlying prey-predator relationship between the autocratic manager and his subordinates and how that can tear…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Autocratic leader benefits those employees who require close supervision. Creative employees who thrive in group functions detest this leadership style.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leo1 Week 4 Paper

    • 4436 Words
    • 18 Pages

    LO 1.2: Explain of the relation between an organization’s structure and culture can impact on the performance of the business:…

    • 4436 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mgt311

    • 3831 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.…

    • 3831 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kinicki, A. Kreitner, R. (2009). Organizational Behavior: Key Concepts, Skills, & Best Practices. McGraw-Hill Companies…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personality Assessment

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior (15th ed.). : Prentice Hall.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    * Autocratic – leaders who follow this style of leadership tend to make unilateral decisions, they limit their employee knowledge by only telling…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an autocratic leadership style, the person in charge has total authority and control over decision making. By virtue of their position and job responsibilities, they not only control the efforts of the team, but monitor them for completion –often under close scrutiny…

    • 6512 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Leadership Styles

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first style of leadership is called the authoritarian style. The characteristics of this leadership style are when an individual controls all the decisions with little or no input from the group. This type of leader is like a dictator in that he dictates all the decisions by the group and rarely trusts input from the group. This style is usually used when there is a strong leader, a quick decision is needed, a definite time limit, and there is a stressful situation such as a military conflict. Members of the group might prefer this style because it allows the group to concentrate on the task and not on how to do the task. Although this style of leadership may be useful at times there are several downfalls to this style. Since leaders who use this style do not consult there group on decisions they may be viewed as a dictator or as bossy, causing the group to dislike the leader which then hurts the overall performance of the group. While the authoritarian style has several downfalls, leaders can use this style wisely. The best time to use this style is when the leader is the most knowledgeable member of the group or is the only member that knows how to get more information on the situation. An example of when to use this style is in a combat situation when the combatant leader knows best. Using this style could be disastrous when used at the wrong time and with the wrong obstacles. The wrong time to use this style would be a situation such as repairing a vehicle or explosive devise in which the leader…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Management Styles

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages

    An Autocratic or authoritarian manager makes all the decisions, keeping the information and decision making among the senior management. Objectives and tasks are set and the workforce is expected to do exactly as required. The communication involved with this method is mainly downward, from the leader to the subordinate. The main advantage of this style is that the direction of the business will remain constant, and the decisions will all be similar, this in turn can project an image of a confident, well managed business. On the other hand, subordinates may become dependent upon the leaders and supervision may be needed.…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Management Styles

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In contrast to the above an autocratic manager dictates orders to their staff and makes decisions without any consultation. The leader likes to control the situation they are in. Decision are quick because staff are not consulted and work is usually completed on time. However this type of management style can decrease motivation and increase staff turnover because staff are not consulted and do not feel valued.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics