Leo1 Week 4 Paper

Department of Business

Assessment on learning outcome LO1 to LO4

Submitted to
Irfan Jahangir

Submitted by
Tanvir Ahmed
ID: 2015121013
First Semester

Submission Date
March 8, 2015.
Table of Contents

LO 1.1: Compare and contrast different organizational structure and culture: 1
LO 1.2: Explain of the relation between an organization’s structure and culture can impact on the performance of the business: 3
LO 1.3: Discuss the factors which influence individual behavior at work: 5
Demographic Factors: 5
Ability and Skills Factors: 6
Attitude Factors: 6
Personality Factors: 6
Perception Factors: 7
LO 2.1: Compare of the effectiveness of different leadership styles in different organizations: 7
Autocratic Leadership: 7
Participative/Democratic Leadership: 7
Delegative/Laissez-Faire Leadership: 8
LO 3.1: Discuss the impact that different leadership style may have on motivation in organizations in period of change: 8
Example of Leadership styles- TESCO, UK: 8
LO 2.2: Explain of how organizational theory underpins the practice of management: 9
Contingency Theory: 9
Classical Theory: 10
Scientific Management: 10
LO 2.3: Evaluate the different approaches to management used by different organizations: 10
LO 3.2: Compare the application of different motivational theories within the workplace: 12
Vroom’s Expectancy Model: 14
LO 3.3: Evaluate the usefulness of a motivation theory for managers: 16
LO 4.1: Explain the nature of groups and group behavior within organizations: 16
Nature of Group: 17
Formal Groups: 17
Informal Groups: 18
LO 4.2: Discuss factors that may promote or inhibit the development of effective teamwork in organizations: 19
Forming: 20
Storming: 20
Norming: 20
Performing: 20
Adjourning: 20
LO 4.3: Evaluate the impact of technology on team functioning within a given organizations: 21
References: 23

LO 1.1: Compare and contrast different organizational structure and culture:
Burger n Boost based on flat, simple and informal organizational structure. Burger n Boost’s decisions making processes are centralized. There are no scope to take any decision by other person except owner. Burger n Boost is loosely structured that influence their employee’s performance. Burger n Boost’s structure based on simple and flat organizational structure as follows:

Figure: Burger n Boost organizational structure. [Source: http://www.burgernboostbd.com/]

On the other hand, McDonald’s is a very big organization based on tall and formal organizational structure. McDonald’s decisions making and management process is centralized and divisionalized. For divisionalized organizational structure, McDonald’s has succeeded to explore their expertise worldwide and accomplish customer expectation. McDonald’s structure based on Tall, divisionalized and formal organizational structure as follows:

Figure: McDonald’s organizational structure.
Because of the organizational loosely structure Burger n Boost lack of ideas, how to expand their business worldwide. No consolation taken from others. Burger n Boost is a small organization there are less chance to training and tendency to copy from other organization. In addition, the requirement process is in formal that can influence towards the progression of the whole organization. In that part McDonald’s is more professional training of employees and system of check and balance to everyone make McDonald globally recognized. For divisionalized section helped, McDonald has to expand their business by taking ideas from different management.
Cultures of organization is created on based on values, expectations, basic attitudes of all employees and the formal and informal interaction among management, employees, customers. In addition culture created by founder or owner of the organization. For example, Bill Gates has always work for long hours for this reason worker of the Microsoft have the same sense of culture. Likewise, Late Ray Kroc founder of McDonald’s have sense of culture that provide good food with friendly and family oriented restaurant and cleanliness. In Burger and Boost, owner’s created culture is very nonprofessional and stressful. Burger n Boost follows Power Culture where everything is centralized. McDonald’s follows Power Culture, Role Culture, Task Culture and Person Culture. McDonald’s culture is very friendly and professional where employees can empathies with each other. Employee’s attitudes towards McDonald’s and customer is dedicated. McDonald’s has culture to serve their guest within 120 second. And have a system name GABUSTER time where every Thursday inspector come to the store and check that weather service and behavior of employees are positive during work time or not. Organizations is known by their culture like McDonald’s team member are trained, friendly to customer and with each other, can share their ideas to management and all team member has job security. In Burger n Boost’s employees does not get proper training, does not right to take any decision and does not have professional approach towards customer and the organization.
In sum up, I believe that lack of organizational culture and structure in Burger n Boost’s growth is slow. However, if Burger n Boost follow proper organizational culture and structure like McDonald’s it can be a leading chain restaurant worldwide.
LO 1.2: Explain of the relation between an organization’s structure and culture can impact on the performance of the business:
To achieve their objectives adequately organizations constantly need to have a formal structure. This is essential to appropriate assignments into diverse groups to guarantee that no two individuals are chipping away at the same extend or undertaking so, we get the most yield for our information. Since organizations cannot be run without individuals, this has a tendency to make different casual structures or situations in the organizations which prompts distinctive mentality, recognitions, practices and attributes with parts distinctive sorts of aptitudes.
Business execution in a Functional Organization structure can be extremely influenced when it takes for the stream of correspondence through the diverse levels of the chain of command making the association moderate to hold fast to the innovation, the political circumstances, the economy, social changes or social components and legitimate issues. The level of motivation employees have will influence their yield influencing business execution. Employees may not comprehend the greater situation and the significant of their individual work. Employees may have a terrible observation towards work or in light of the fact that everything are characterized and correspondence is restricted, this could bring about an indifferent nature and state of mind much more prominent influencing representative relations, influencing motivation, bringing about low business performance.
Cultural aspect are those that advance in discourse and are in change, always adjusting. Numerous cases hierarchical society portrays what things connote, whether great or terrible, right or wrong, and how to gain them when cannot be set-up by formal step.
Then a Divisional Organizational structure has more noteworthy adaptability because of low levels of administration. This quick ascribe to change makes it focused, ready to conform to clients’ needs and providing for it better performance. Better correspondence supports individual through activity and force to settle on choices giving the inclination of adaptability toward oneself, bringing on exceptionally energetic representatives, which influences business in a decent manner.
Matrix being the more up to date authoritative structure, it is a bit unique in relation to the old thinking about the commonplace supervisor; it likewise rethinks the thought of progressive system or people utilization of hierarchical force to settle on choices however that of skill force of employees.
LO 1.3: Discuss the factors which influence individual behavior at work:
Human behavior is very complex and reaction depends on situations. If we understand how people behave on different situation then we can manage people on workplace for achieving set goal in organizations. In an organization, management use the existing resources for given task and have to understand individual behavior. Individual behavior at work depends on five factors according to John Lvancevich and Michael Mattson. These are:

Figure: Five Factors of Individual Behavior at Work
Demographic Factors:
The demographic variables are financial foundation, training, nationality, race, age, sex, and so on. Organizations favor persons that have a place with great financial foundation, decently taught, youthful and so forth as they are accepted to be performing superior to the others. The youthful and element experts that have great academic foundation and powerful relational abilities are constantly in incredible interest. The investigation of demographic components is noteworthy as it helps managements to pick the suitable employer for a specific occupation.
For example, In KFC there are no discrimination for requirement of employees. There are no rules for individual employees. KFC follow international labor law. In addition, there is no certain rules for particular race, sex, color etc. For this reason, KFC is an organization where we can find different types of people where everybody are willing to share their knowledge according to their ability. Nowadays KFC is giant leading organization in the world of hospitality. In KFC every employees consider as a potential candidate for providing ideas and employee’s friendliness makes KFC internationally recognized and different from other organization.
On the other hand, in Burger n Boost, Bangladesh has some problem about sex. In Bangladesh, female are not contributing properly on hospitality industry because of abuse and discrimination & salary issue. Male get paid more than women are though women work same job and hours.
Ability and Skills Factors:
The physical limit of a single person to do something can be termed as capacity. Ability can be characterized as the capacity to act in a manner that permits an individual to perform well.
Such as in KFC management know, individual ability and skill, which will help KFC, achieve goal and fulfil expectations.
Nevertheless, in Burger n Boost employees are work only for money so they do not have any permission to talk over management or showing their knowledge because of informal and centralized organization system.
Attitude Factors:
According to psychologists, attitude can defined as a tendency to respond favorably or unfavorably to certain objects, persons or situations. A positive attitude can reach an organization to its desired point.
Likewise, KFC arrange training session for their every single employee. This training can improvise the negative attitude of an employee and grow can do attitude on them.
There no formal training session arranged by Burger n Boost management to examine the attitude of employees.
Personality Factors:
Personality depends on different aspect in different individual. It can be social, economic, religion or geographic.
Personality is very personal factor in workplace because we only see people from outside, we measure people by their personality that heading to whether he/she can fulfil the task or not. Sometimes well-groomed person has poor personality. Negative personality can be barrier of an important task, which will effect on the job performance.
Perception Factors:
The cognitive methodology implied for deciphering the ecological boosts in a significant manner alluded to as recognition. Each person on the premise of his/he reference can compose and translate ecological boosts. Numerous components influence the impression of a single person. The investigation of observation assumes critical part for the directors. It is vital for troughs to make the great workplace with the goal that workers see them in most positive way. The workers are prone to perform better on the off chance that they are going to see it in a positive manner.
Perception, whether misunderstanding the situation or there any awkward information avoiding.
LO 2.1: Compare of the effectiveness of different leadership styles in different organizations:
Leadership is a vital subject that will dependably pull in consideration because of its importance in molding the fortunes of organizations as everywhere as possible. Leadership is defined as “the process of influencing others to understand and agree about what needs to be done and how to do it, and the process of facilitating individual and collective efforts to accomplish shared objectives” by Yukl. The requirement for leadership styles may contrast as per the circumstances and organizations. There are so might initiative styles we can consider like Autocratic, Democratic/Participative, Delegative/Laissez-Faire.
Autocratic Leadership:
The autocratic leadership style permits managers to settle on choices alone without the info of others. Managers have absolute power and force their will on workers. Nobody challenges the final decision of autocratic leaders.
Participative/Democratic Leadership:
Frequently called the democratic leadership style, participative initiative values the data of colleagues and other workers, yet the obligation of settling on an official choice rests with the participative leader. Participative leadership supports worker resolve in light of the fact that employees settle on commitments to the choice making methodology. It makes them feel as though their feelings matter. At the point when an organization needs to roll out improvements inside the association, the participative leadership style helps workers acknowledge changes effectively because they assume a part simultaneously. This style meets challenges when organizations need to settle on a choice in a very short time.
Delegative/Laissez-Faire Leadership:
This style, likewise called laissez-faire leadership or delegative leadership style, which is commonly viewed as the slightest compelling alternative. A glaring difference to the next essential styles, delegative leaders seldom decide, surrendering this capacity over to the team. These leaders occasional offer direction to the group and employee choice making to trusted colleagues. While offering few focal points, this style frequently makes a few weaknesses.
LO 3.1: Discuss the impact that different leadership style may have on motivation in organizations in period of change:
Example of Leadership styles- TESCO, UK:
Tesco is a client-orientated business. It plans to offer items that give quality to cash for its clients and to convey astounding administration. To keep at the highest point of its amusement what 's more to keep up its number one spot in the business sector, the organization needs talented staff whatsoever levels and in all parts. Tesco plans to build up the authority characteristics of its kin all through the association, from executives and client aides to the leading group of chiefs. Authority is about impacting, persuading and motivating individuals. It is about instructing and creating individuals, approaching them with deference yet difficult them. Pioneers look to make solid groups, with individuals focused on the association 's general objectives. The business journalists Tannenbaum and Schmidt categorized different leadership styles. They suggested that leadership styles could be explained on a scale ranging from ‘Autocratic’, ‘Democratic/Participative’, ‘Delegative/Laissez-Faire’.
Some Leadership approaches interest up to a point. Nevertheless, the managers claims all authority to settle on an official choice. Managers receiving an 'I sell ' rationality will attempt to convince their groups to acknowledge their perspective. Managers adopting an ‘I consult’ methodology will look for the suppositions of subordinates before taking a action. The vote-based methodology is described by an 'I share ' reasoning. Choices are made inside groups, with every part having equivalent information. Stephen 's favored initiative style is to take a democratic methodology. He counsels broadly, as he feels that staff react better to this methodology. Case in point, when arranging a significant stock diminishment program, he urges his managers to advance thoughts and create plans. This expands group inspiration and energizes imagination. A few oversights may be made, however they are utilized as a learning knowledge.
Laissez-faire is at the other side of the range from autocratic. Laissez-faire managers take a ‘hands-off’ approach and trusts groups to take fitting choices or actions with expansive concurred limits. Case in point Martin, Tesco 's Program Manager for Education what 's more Skills in the UK may leave an accomplished departmental supervisor to build up a preparing plan. This could be because of he trusts that the supervisor has a decent information of the needs of the division and of the business.
LO 2.2: Explain of how organizational theory underpins the practice of management:
A contingency approach to administration is focused around the hypothesis that administration viability is contingent, or dependent, upon the interchange between the application of administration practices and particular circumstances. As it were, the way you oversee ought to change relying upon the circumstances. One size does not fit all.
Contingency Theory:
Fred E. Fiedler 's contingency theory focuses on the conviction that there is no ideal path for administrators to lead. Distinctive circumstances make diverse initiative style necessities for directors. The style that works in one environment may not work in an alternate. According to the hypothesis, we can evaluate situational idealness by three elements: Leader-member relations, Task structure and Position power.
Classical Theory:
The Scientific school hypothesis was produced by Frederick Winslow Taylor, the hypothesis is focused around the accept that there is “one best way” to do a job and the scientific methods can be used to determine that “one best way”.
An alternate donor of the scientific management is Henri Fayol (1841-1925). A French engineer, he built his own particular study in light of the Managing Director and worked downwards. Fayol 's hypothesis was focused around "general theory of organization". Fayol then again did not accept that there was a situated of quantities of approaches to deal with the organizations and its employees; he constructed an individual perception and experience of what functioned admirably as far as association. Nonetheless, he proposed fourteen standards of administration. There are some principle as follows: Authority, Discipline, Unity of Command, Unity of Direction, Subordination of individual interest, Remuneration, Scalar Chain, Initiative, Equity, Stability of Tenure of Personnel, Order, Esprit de Corps.
Scientific Management:
The third stream is the scientific management. However, organization and authoritative theory concentrated on macro parts of the structure and techniques of human organizations, scientific management worried about micro viewpoints, for example, physical exercises of work through time-and-movement study also examination of men-machine connections. Dissimilar to in the other two, the scientific management and built its inductive prevailing upon respect to point-by-point study and observational proof. In juxtaposition, the standards of organization and authoritative theory were formed by synthesizing knowledge and perception with unique thinking.

LO 2.3: Evaluate the different approaches to management used by different organizations:
Both McDonald’s and Burger n Boost take after two or more management approaches as some of them change relying upon the circumstance, when we say Classical approaches is underscores on the organizations formal structure, specialized necessities and set of standards and in both organizations we can see the formal structure furthermore the standards on how everything is carried out. There is a guideline for everything and a standard way that things are carried out. In McDonald’s, management team always take care of other employees or guide them to achieve given goal. McDonald’s is a very large organization so it has strong management approaches to it. Beside Burger n Boost is a very small organization which is based on informal structure so it management approaches is not that much strong like McDonald’s.

Figure: Management approaches of McDonald’s
[Source: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/management]

The Human Resource viewpoint to management proposed that occupations ought to be intended to meet more elevated amounts needs by permitting laborers to utilize their maximum capacity. In McDonald 's they treat all employees similarly, open doors are given to everybody, the employee’s thoughts, and new advancements are taken into thought. The individuals working under McDonald 's is persuaded by the protected workspace, benefit offer pay and different profits. They additionally verify that the workers are issue free from any viewpoint at all times, as though any individual issue it will influence the execution of the worker. Nevertheless, in Burger n Boost, they do not treat employees equally because of centralized and small organization. Burger n Boost does not take any decision from general employees. The contingency approach to management is an augmentation of the humanistic point of view, which is in light of the thought that in an organization there is nobody ideal path in the management process (organizing, leading, planning and controlling) to effectively resolve any customized circumstances. On the grounds that organizations, individuals and circumstances change and change over the long haul. Therefore, the correct thing to do relies on upon a complex mixture of basic ecological and interior contingencies. In the food industry numerous things rely on upon the client needs and needs consequently numerous circumstances vary starting with one client then onto the next so relying upon the sort of issue the arrangement will be based and this approach is regular in McDonald’s and Burger n Boost.
LO 3.2: Compare the application of different motivational theories within the workplace:
Motivational scholars consider that for every single thing we do there is a principal reason; as such it impacts our conduct ', our decision of conduct and its permanence, and the measure of effort put into it. Employees additionally accept that energy about the reasons will empower expectation and consequently take into account impact on those practices or actions. Motivational research today concentrates mainly on the determination of what goads motivation - what boost is obliged to expand motivation - and takes both inborn and outward motivation into thought. Inborn motivation as per Oudeyer & Kaplon (2007) is best comprehended when appeared differently in relation to outward motivation, which identifies with any movement that is attempted due to some of sort of prize or discrete result. Inherent motivation by helpful definition alludes to exercises that are attempted exclusively for joy with no value or quality forced on it. There are diverse motivational theories for work environment to execution management, which are talked about in impending discourse.
Maslow’s hierarchy of Needs Model:
As indicated by A. H. Maslow human need are not of equivalent quality, and they rise in a clear succession. Specifically, as the essential needs get to be sensibly decently fulfilled, an individual places more accentuation on the secondary needs.
Maslow 's progressive system of requirements centers consideration on five levels, such as:
Figure: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Need Model [http://www.ukessays.com/essays/management]
Herzberg’s Two Factors Model:
On the premise examination with engineer and accountants, Frederick Herzberg added a two factors model of motivation. He solicited his subjects to think from time when they felt particularly great about their occupation and time when they felt uncommonly awful about their employment. He likewise requested that they portray the condition that prompted those emotions. Herzberg found that employees named diverse sorts of conditions that created great and awful emotions. Herzberg reason that two different sets of elements that affected motivation at work environment. Those are:

Source: www.practical-management-skills.com
Vroom’s Expectancy Model:
Vrooms hope expectancy theory accept that conduct result from conscious choices among choices whose reason it is to amplify joy and to minimize pain. Vroom understood that a worker 's execution is in light of individual variables, for example, skills, personality, experience, knowledge and abilities. He expressed that effort; execution and motivation are connected in an individual 's motivation. He utilizes the variablesEffor, performance and reward to record for this.

Source: Google
Motivational factors in workplace depends on organizations size, employees, environment etc. Maslow’s motivational theory are more demonstrated briefly than Herzberg and Vitor Vroom’s motivational theory.
The greatest quality of Maslow 's need theory identifies with its natural nature. It just simply understandable well that one will most likely be unable to appreciate higher-order needs when they have no spot to live and nothing to eat. While one may briefly seek after a more elevated amount require, the craving for sustenance and asylum would most certainly turn into the essential concentrate once more. Maslow fail to possess the cement meaning of the needs, the importance of safety, steem, and different components that make up Maslow 's theory making it hard to test. Additionally, generally as standards between people fluctuate, so do standards between societies. Components like esteem and self-actualization may have immensely distinctive implications crosswise over diverse societies making it tricky to sum up Maslow 's hypothesis. Because of these difficulties, there is minimal experimental confirmation that backings Maslow 's theory.
On the other hand, the two-element theory ignores situational variables. Herzberg expected a relationship between satisfaction and productivity. In any case the exploration directed by Herzberg focused upon satisfaction and overlooked productivity. No far reaching measure of satisfaction is used. A worker may discover his employment adequate in spite of the way that he may despise/question an aspect of his responsibilities. The two factor theory is not free from inclination as it is in view of the characteristic response of workers when they are enquirer the wellsprings of fulfillment and disappointment at work. They will accuse disappointment for the outer elements, for example, pay structure, organization strategies and companion relationship. Additionally, the workers will offer credit to themselves for the fulfillment component at work.
Vroom 's expectancy theory varies from the substance theories of Maslow and Herzberg in that Vroom 's expectancy theory does not give particular recommendations on what motivates organization individuals. Rather, Herzberg’s two factors model gives a methodology of cognitive variables that reflects singular contrasts in work motivation.
For example, TESCO PLC started its journey in 1991.
Now TESCO has 2,200 with 468,000 employees. Being a world largest organization TESCO has to follow different types of motivational theory to motivate its employees. Mostly TESCO use Frederick Herzberg two factors model of motivational theory. Herzberg demonstrated that to motivate an employee a business needs to make conditions that make him or her vibe satisfied in the work environment. Tesco expects to motivate its employees both by paying attention to hygiene factors and by enabling satisfiers. Case in point, it motivates and empowers its employees by fitting and communicating, by designating obligation and including staff in choice making. It holds discussions consistently in which staff can be a part of the discussions on pay climbs. Tesco always ensure employees safety on workplace. Tesco always give its employees benefit who are able to work hard for it. Likewise TESCO has pay system, who works after 11:00 pm means night sift they will be paid £11.67 per hour but who are working in normal sift get £7.64 per hour. On other hand TESCO, employees get FREE SHARE as benefit who work hard and fulfil TESCO’s desire
goal.

LO 3.3: Evaluate the usefulness of a motivation theory for managers:
Motivation makes human assets accessible for activity, as every activity obliged physical, financial and singular contribution. Through utilization of Motivation managers can turn assets vigorously in this manner they can use those assets for advancement and development. Motivation enhances the level of effectiveness in organization as employee 's puts full efforts disregarding their capabilities and learning they are included to pick up the advantages of motivational factor. In this manner, motivation in organization enhances execution level for upper level employees. It helps in increment in productivity, enhances the proficiency of staff and lessens the expense for operations. It drives organizations and managements to attain to the set organizational objectives by the usage of accessible assets adequately and in better way. Builds collaboration at work, makes better workplace and functions as empower for higher execution level. Motivation assembles inviting relationship among supervisors and staff as staff meets a few advantages for their execution. It builds the staff fulfillment level at work and creates trust and certainty at working environment because of financial and non-financial motivations. So also, motivation gets to be essential for business on the grounds that it motivated staff, engages director and teams, makes collaboration environment, makes feeling of having a place and obligation among staff, diminishes operational expenses and sets aside time effective activity.
For example In TESCO PLC store there are devisionlized managers everyone follow different types of motivational theory. TESCO managers mostly follow Maslow 's Hierarchy of Needs because they believe in self-actualization needs because managers get many benefit, which motivate them to do their job properly and influence other employees to work, heard. TESCO always value hard worker who deliver unquestionable world class service to its customer.
LO 4.1: Explain the nature of groups and group behavior within organizations:
Teams are vital and significant feature of business associations. Work at organizations is isolated into sub-units that are comprises of bureaus of groups. These groups shape the conduct of organizations and are in charge of exercises at organizations. It is critical for management to create seeing about the way of groups inside organizations. The collaboration level among groups indispensable for organization exercises. Along these lines, individuals with distinctive aptitudes and conduct designs with in groups influence the level of group execution. The administration style of managers is having vital impact over these groups and prompts achievement or disappointment of groups endeavors. The arrangement of group’s advances cooperation, coordination, collaboration, experience imparting, direction accessibility for new staff and collective outcome of business action.
Nature of Group:
Organizations create groups for an assortment of reasons. Diverse traditional theory of groups endeavor to clarify why supervisors form groups. The theory of nearness proposes worker 's closeness as the reason in light of the fact that people who working at spots placed near to each other have a tendency to structure groups. As indicated by balance theory, group arrangement results from the similarity of state of mind and values between individuals. People with normal investments maintain their relationship by an equivalent harmony between their demeanor and common interests. An alternate theory of group development is the trade theory. It recommends reward-cost results of cooperation as the reason. By getting to be individuals from groups, people finish their requirement for affiliation. Groups can be build two way within organizations likewise:

Figure: Nature of groups within organizations.
Formal Groups:
These are the units that are secured by management of an organization as a component of an organizational structure. They are characterized as far as their motivation and parts. They are official as in they have fitting power and they are given financial and physical resources to achieve certain goal.
Informal Groups:
Informal groups, structured by the staffs themselves. The purposes behind the development of Informal groups can be the requirement for closeness, customary hobbies, growth or support. There are two sorts of Informal groups: friendship groups and interest groups. Individuals from friendship groups have a benevolent association with one another, regular diversions and are comparable in age and perspective, yet interest groups are structured to deal with a movement and are brief.
For example, In BURGER n BOOST can define two types of group like nature of groups. However, being a small organization it is very hard to find any formal group within BURGER n BOOST. Nevertheless, there is existence of informal group where employees share their emotions, interest etc. All staffs are very much cooperative among them to job done. In BURGER n BOOST there is a small formal group which form every year during the winter season to change their menu by conducting all three store managers. That formal group is small but effective to the BURGER n BOOST.

LO 4.2: Discuss factors that may promote or inhibit the development of effective teamwork in organizations:
French & Bell said that the enthusiasm for teamwork has expanded in the later past, and there is added weight to create managed toward oneself and coordinated groups to enhance quality, adaptability and employee morale. Numerous components, for example, physical, social and mental make individuals unique in relation to each other, and this may cause challenges in team building successfully. Comparable hobbies and foundations among the colleagues would result in the cohesiveness of the group to increase, and build the possibilities of accomplishment inside the groups. Similitude in foundation would clear path for more compassion and understanding among the colleagues. The steadiness and permanency of the group as well, assumes some part in this. A perpetual group would be more likely to get on well with one another. Comparable expertise levels and preparing are likewise positive contributors in assisting the groups to get. There are some stages about group or team building like:
Figure: Group Formation. [Source: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/management/organisation-and-behaviour-report-management-essay.php]
Forming:
Forming is the first stage is making a group, it is the choice process and can be, as we would like to think be a standout amongst the most imperative steps when searching for individuals. People make inquiries of each other to make sense of whether a select number of individuals would be useful to the group. Individuals at this stage do not totally open up and carry on with professional skill as they are searching for acknowledgement in the group.
Storming:
Amid this stage, individuals are starting to voice their individual contrasts, join with other people who offer the same beliefs, and racer for position in the group. Subsequently, it is essential for individuals to keep on being profoundly included with one another, including to voice any concerns to feel spoke to and caught on.
Norming:
In this stage, individuals are starting to impart a typical responsibility to the motivation behind the group, including to its general objectives and how each of the objectives can be attained to.
Performing:
In this stage, the group is working viably and productively to accomplishing its objectives. Amid this stage, the style of leadership gets to be more indirect as individuals tackle stronger interest and contribution in the group process. Preferably, the style incorporates helping individuals to think about their encounters and to gain from them.
Adjourning:
Adjourning is called Closing and celebration. Adjourning is a final stage of group function process, which was included in 1977. Adjourning is the last stage and is the group meets up to praise the endeavours of each other for finishing the undertaking. Adjourning group will dependably meet up towards the end of a project and complement one another for their performance, in light of the fact every comprehends that parts of the undertaking cannot be finished without the other.
Case in point, McDonald’s have great leadership and this helps them to propel and even motivate the colleagues to get included in making a positive workplace, alongside high levels of commitment. McDonald’s group leader not just focus all alone point and bearing of the group, additionally verifies that alternate individuals from the group share this interest. Likewise, they are able to advance a high level of morale between the colleagues with the goal that they feel upheld and esteemed. McDonald’s train their workers to have great and successful communication in light of the fact that communication is an imperative variable of interpersonal connection.
On the other hand, BURGER n BOOST does not follow such group dynamic to form a group. There are no such formal group who work for particular objective but some informal group can be seen in BURGER n BOOST, which is built by nature or by organization needs. For this reason TESCO PLC are more successful than BURGER N BOOST. All assignment given by organization in McDonald’s, there will be a group, which are combination of different, colour, and race or can be different successful people. Therefore, they can share ideas, feelings or knowledge that can boost the given objective to be fulfilled.
LO 4.3: Evaluate the impact of technology on team functioning within a given organizations:
Work environments are adjusting new innovation at an exponentially expanding rate throughout the most recent few decades. Organizations see innovation as a game changer to build their benefits. Organizations use advancements likewise mobile phone, messenger, Email, Personal desktop partner, tablets and live conferencing applications etc. for consistent communication in their organizations. As innovation has its merits, additionally has its disadvantage and faults. Virtual collaboration has been consolidated by the greater part of the organizations.
E-mail is based on internet which is most quickly spreading manifestation of communication which organizations are embracing quickly to help their groups. The utilization of email helps groups to impart and hold data for best execution.
Mobile phones additionally have their immense effect on business and groups inside organizations, as it is speediest and dependable approach to impart in the middle of groups and get help on time.
Groupware are new innovative apparatus help groups in arranging meetings, build coordinated effort and work in a virtual domain with preferred results over emails and telephones.
PCs are mainstream in business as apparatus for administration, communication and record keeping. The utilization of laptop is extremely famous in business group and helps the ceaseless organization among colleagues through utilization of internet and its ability is greater and better than beforehand said devices.
Burger n Boost use many types of technological equipment that help in communication among employees. Most effective source is smart phone because todays smart phones contain everything. Now Burger n Boost use only one PO system entry order which is effective for running the in store operation. Nevertheless, McDonald’s has PO system, which, is connected to all internal stakeholders, which helps it tracking everything. McDonald’s has a system name smart messengers, which is used for communicating with management within a second. McDonald’s use employees entry system to track who are going off or who are coming to the work. Burger n Boost is way behind compare to McDonald’s in term of technological uses in workplace.

In this way, one can plainly propose from all the above talks that undoubtedly a sound organizational culture and organizational structure plays the deciding variable for the achievement or disappointment of the organizations. In this focused business environment, all the organizations are continually attempting to enhance their organizational culture so they can have an edge over their competitors. Employees are an imperative part of organizational culture and hence there are different elements that impact singular conduct at the working environment. By analyzing multinational organizations likewise McDonald’s, Tesco Plc. very organized in term of professionalism. They have functional organization culture and structure and their leaders are much more concern about how to operate the organizations and how to be in business field respectfully. Though Burger n Boost is based on loosely structured and leadership skill of leader has lack of knowledge because, Burger n Boost is centralized in one point. McDonald’s follow Maslow’s motivational theory on the other hand Tesco Plc. follow various theory to motivate employees who are main engine of their success.
In sum up, I want to suggest Burger n Boost, if Burger n Boost want to expand its footstep to worldwide Burger n Boost has to concentrate on organizational structure, and motivate the employees by offering benefit, job security, hire knowledgeable employees and safe work environment. Burger n Boost has an option to be a world renewed food chain.

References:

Burger n Boost. 2015. Burger n Boost. [ONLINE] Available at:http://www.burgernboostbd.com/about.html. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

Divisional Organizational Structure | Chron.com. 2015. Divisional Organizational Structure | Chron.com. [ONLINE] Available at:http://smallbusiness.chron.com/divisional-organizational-structure-71784.html. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

Employee motivation. Motivation in the workplace- theory and practice. 2015. Employee motivation. Motivation in the workplace- theory and practice. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.accel-team.com/motivation/. [Accessed 28 February 2015].

EVALUATING ORGANISATION VALUES AND STRUCTURE AND THEIR EFFECT. 2015. EVALUATING ORGANISATION VALUES AND STRUCTURE AND THEIR EFFECT. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/evaluating-organisation-values-and-structure-and-their-effect-business-essay.php. [Accessed 06 March 2015].

Fred Luthans, 2004. Organizational Behavior. 10 Edition. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Group Dynamics: Basic Nature of Groups and How They Develop. 2015. Group Dynamics: Basic Nature of Groups and How They Develop. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.managementhelp.org/groups/dynamics-theories.htm. [Accessed 06 March 2015].

Herzbergs Two-Factor Theory of Motivation. 2015. Herzbergs Two-Factor Theory of Motivation. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.managementstudyguide.com/herzbergs-theory-motivation.htm. [Accessed 28 February 2015]. http://ir.uz.ac.zw/jspui/bitstream/10646/653/1/group_%26_groups_behaviour.pdf. [Accessed 28 February 2015]. http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Luneneburg,%20Fred%20C%20Expectancy%20Theory%20%20Altering%20Expectations%20IJMBA%20V15%20N1%202011.pdf. [Accessed 28 February 2015]. https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&sqi=2&ved=0CDUQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.businesscasestudies.co.uk%2Fretrieve_tesco_16_dGVzY28vdGVhY2hlcnMvMTYvbGVzc29uLXJlc291cmNlLWxlYWRlcnNoaXAtc3R5bGVzLnBkZnx8&ei=MtTYVOS8LOTwmAXwo4CYCw&usg=AFQjCNF2aNDYR3J8d68fOnKDtoSAQz5V9g&bvm=bv.85464276,d.dGY. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

Individual Behavior in Organization. 2015. Individual Behavior in Organization. [ONLINE] Available at: http://practical-management.com/Organization-Development/Individual-Behavior-in-Organization.html. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

John W. Newstrom, 2006. Organizational Behavior: Human Behavior at Work. 12th Edition. McGraw Hill Higher Education.

John W. Newstrom, 2006. Organizational Behavior: Human Behavior at Work. 12th Edition. McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Legal | KFC.com. 2015. Legal | KFC.com. [ONLINE] Available at:http://www.kfc.com/about/legal.asp. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

McDonald’s Corporate Leadership :: AboutMcDonalds.com. 2015.McDonald’s Corporate Leadership :: AboutMcDonalds.com. [ONLINE] Available at:http://www.aboutmcdonalds.com/mcd/our_company/leadership.html. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

Mcdonalds Structure And Culture Business Essay. 2015. Mcdonalds Structure And Culture Business Essay. [ONLINE] Available at:http://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/mcdonalds-structure-and-culture-business-essay.php. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

Motivation in the workplace | UK Essays . 2015. Motivation in the workplace | UK Essays . [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.ukessays.com/dissertation/proposal/management/motivation-in-the-workplace.php. [Accessed 28 February 2015].
Motivation Theories For The Workplace. 2015. Motivation Theories For The Workplace. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.practical-management-skills.com/motivation-theories.html. [Accessed 28 February 2015].
MS-10 Organisational Design, Development and Change: Describe different approaches to organisation and their relevance. Explain 7Ss Model and it’s significance in organisations.. 2015. MS-10 Organisational Design, Development and Change: Describe different approaches to organisation and their relevance. Explain 7Ss Model and it’s significance in organisations.. [ONLINE] Available at:http://organisationaldesign.blogspot.com/2009/06/describe-different-approaches-to.html. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

Need Theories - PSYCH 484: Work Attitudes and Job Motivation - Confluence. 2015. Need Theories - PSYCH 484: Work Attitudes and Job Motivation - Confluence. [ONLINE] Available at: https://wikispaces.psu.edu/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51544190. [Accessed 28 February 2015].
Organization Behaviour - Tesco Vs Siemens AG | Syed Momin - Academia.edu. 2015. Organization Behaviour - Tesco Vs Siemens AG | Syed Momin - Academia.edu. [ONLINE] Available at: https://www.academia.edu/9333841/Organization_Behaviour_-_Tesco_Vs_Siemens_AG. [Accessed 06 March 2015].

Pippa Riley, 2011. organisations and behaviour: business essentials series. Edition.
Relationship between organisations structure and culture. 2015.Relationship between organisations structure and culture. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/relationship-between-an-organisation-s-structure-and-culture-business-essay.php. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

Relationship between Organizational Structure and Culture. 2015.Relationship between Organizational Structure and Culture. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.ukessays.com/essays/business/relationship-between-organizational-structure-and-culture-business-essay.php. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

Robert A. Baron, Jeral Greenberg, 2000. Behavior In Organizations. 5th ed. India: Prentice,Hall of India Private Limited .

Situational Approaches to Leadership . 2015. Situational Approaches to Leadership . [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.cliffsnotes.com/more-subjects/principles-of-management/leadership-and-management/situational-approaches-to-leadership. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

The Advantages of Divisional Structure in Organizations | Business & Entrepreneurship - azcentral.com. 2015. The Advantages of Divisional Structure in Organizations | Business & Entrepreneurship - azcentral.com. [ONLINE] Available at: http://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/advantages-divisional-structure-organizations-11194.html. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

The Difference Between Organizational Culture and Organizational Structure | Chron.com. 2015. The Difference Between Organizational Culture and Organizational Structure | Chron.com. [ONLINE] Available at:http://smallbusiness.chron.com/difference-between-organizational-culture-organizational-structure-25206.html. [Accessed 09 February 2015].

What Are The Factors Which Influence Individual Behaviour At Work? - Blurtit. 2015. What Are The Factors Which Influence Individual Behaviour At Work? - Blurtit. [ONLINE] Available at:http://employment.blurtit.com/1944668/what-are-the-factors-which-influence-individual-behaviour-at-work. [Accessed 09 February 2015].