Preview

Teenagers Right To Medical Decision-Making

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Teenagers Right To Medical Decision-Making
This brochure contains an outline of a teenagers legal rights when it comes to medical decision making.
The health care guidance your child needs at 12-14 years will be different from what they need when they are 15-17 years or 18-19 years. As your child matures with becoming a teenager, health professionals such as GPs, specialists, psychologists, physiotherapists and dentists will start taking into account your child’s opinions and ability to make independent health care decisions. The age at which a young person can consent to simple health care treatments without involving a parent or guardian is around 14 years.
Dependants have the right to participate in decisions that affect their life, and as they mature to teenagers they gain the right to make their own medical decisions.
Generally, teenagers can give their own
…show more content…

Provided that a medical practitioner, believes that it is in the best interests of the child and that the child is capable of understanding the nature, consequences and risks involved in the particular treatment, that child is able to consent to their own treatment.
Although teenagers are able to consent to treatment, they do not have the right to refuse medical treatment ordered for them.
When it is unclear as to who is in position to consent to treatment, or where the parents’ wishes conflict with that of the dependants, the courts guardianship jurisdiction may be used to resolve the confusion or dispute. The decision then made by the court will always be based upon the best interests of the child.
Teenagers can also get their own Medicare card when they are 15, or younger if you personally request it. You can also choose to stay on your family Medicare card and have a copy made to keep for


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Young 17 year-old Cassandra C., from Connecticut refused to continue her chemotherapy treatment for her Hodgkin’s lymphoma diagnosis. Since Cassandra is only 17 year’s old, she is still considered a legal minor. Her parent’s are her legal guardians and are able to provide her…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    MPII 002: Task 1 (part 1)

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Getting a written consent off the child’s parents protects the children and practitioners because if anything happened to that child then you have proof that the child’s parents have given you consent that you can give them medication; so the practitioner isn’t to blame.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We all enjoy our right to autonomy, the freedom to express what can be done to us, the right for self-determination. “Autonomy is based on a person’s ability make rational choices concerning their own life and choose for themselves. They must be treated with respect without interfering with their ability to determine their own paths and make decisions for oneself” (Vaughn 9). The freedom of autonomy gives patients the right decide their healthcare decisions without the influence of the values of their physicians, their colleagues, or society (Schwartz 105).…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question at hand, “Legislated parent-child relationship vs. Open parent-child relationship?” The legislated parent-child relationship can be summarized as a biased approach for the child when it comes to their healthcare decisions. For instance, a teenager would have to have consent from their parents if they wanted to be treated for STIs, mental health counseling, pregnancy prevention and substance abuse. On the other hand, an open-parent-child relationship permits teenagers to seek treatment with or without the consent of their parents. Some teenagers are not comfortable talking to their parents about certain healthcare decisions therefore; it should not be required by law.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is important for practitioners to be aware that all parents have individual needs and circumstances thus needing an individual response. Whilst doing so, it is important to remember to carry out inclusive practice and not to judge or show any prejudice attitude, but instead to show genuine care and interest in helping them. A way in which practitioners can respond to parents is to make sure they know to make appointments for a set date to discuss matters unless it is an emergency. Practitioners must also maintain that they keep to this format and do not let parents change the procedures, as this would not be beneficial to…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    make arrangements for that child to be sent to a hospital, with the consent of their…

    • 680 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I require written permission from parents to get emergency treatment for their child if it is needed.…

    • 2678 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Camerin, even though I did not mention autonomy in my post, I as well believe it’s an important ethical principle. Everyone has the right to make their own decisions and others should respect that. This is very important in healthcare because in many situations patients will refuse treatment or procedures regardless of the benefits. Even though many will think that’s absurd, we just have to learn to respect and move on. Not everyone will agree and that’s okay.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study Abraham Cherrix

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My policy would be fairly similar. It should be the parents responsibility to chose if their child, whom is the patient, will undergo cancer treatment but only under the circumstance that the child is not mature enough or does not fully understand the treatment and the possible outcomes of the treatment. If the patient is fifteen years or older than they should have the responsibility of chosing whether or not to undergo cancer treatment. I say this because fifteen year olds are old enough to know right from wrong and be able to start making some decisions as long as they are mature enough. This would give the child autonomy: a right to choose what they want to do to try and rid their diagnosed cancer. The child who would be receiving the treatment needs to have a full understanding of what the treatment will do to them and the outcomes of it. The outcomes of some cancer treatments are very good which means they have a high chance of killing and getting rid of the cancer. The child, or patient, must be able to fully understand what this treatment can do for them in the long run and be mature enough to make a possible life changing decision. Within my policy, if the child is not mature enough or does not fully understand the treatment being fifteen years or older then the parents should have the…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why is it important to have a parent or guardian present when treating minors, under 16 years of age?…

    • 5714 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teenage girls should be allowed to get birth control without a parents’ permission, because for starters it reduces the number of teen pregnancies, teens have a safer home life, and shows teens are responsible. According to the article, “Some Basic Truths About Teen Sex”, Teens are less likely to use a condom properly, condom slippage and leakage is higher in younger users and only 38.9% will use a condom. This means if girls were on Birth Control, they would be having safer sex by reducing the chance of getting pregnant. Many teens are afraid of being disowned when parents find out that they are having sex. Most teens don’t want their parents knowing that they are having sex plus some parents will say no to having sex. Most teens are mature enough to take precaution towards having safer sex, they are smart enough to think ahead to get birth control. Though many teens are scared to go to a parent and prefer getting it on their own. The writer of ‘Birth- control access irks conservatives” points out that Family planning groups say that notifying parents would rip away traditional confidentiality of the program. Teens might be afraid to come in for help. Andrea Young, a spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood of metropolitan Washington said “unfortunately, teens may or may not have parental permission to become sexually active- it’s a difficult thing to prevent- but we feel they should not be discouraged from doing what’s responsible.” Therefore Doctors respect confidentiality. In the article “Younger teens may get birth control pill; Doctors push for easy access” states that research shows that teens will use the pills if they have them, said Dr. Breuner. “The goal, of course, is to encourage sexually active youths to use regular birth- control methods.” It’s a doctors responsibility to explain the helath risks and and a teenage girl should…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A common and controversial issue facing many medical professionals is medical paternalism versus patient autonomy. At the heart of every practitioner/patient relationship is trust, and the duty to uphold the patient’s best interest both ethically and privately. These foundations seem basic on the surface, but underneath lies a much more complex issue. Medical paternalism can be defined as the intervening of a person’s decision making or actions for her own good.1 Oftentimes, medical paternalism can be considered as interfering with the patient’s autonomy and right to make an intentional, uninfluenced decision regarding her own medical care. Such interference can come in the form of decisions regarding the patient’s physical or psychological care. However, there must be certain caveats in which medical paternalism is unavoidable, and therefore acceptable as an act done in the patient’s best interest, while still holding true to the clinician’s obligation to the patient. This type of paternalism is referred to as weak paternalism.2…

    • 1377 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Feeding Tube

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    All patient’s in the United States have all been equal to one right. The Patient’s Bill of Rights apply to this situation because an individual has the right to make their own decisions as long as they have the right mind and is fully competent. The Patient Bill of Rights is simply a statement that entitles the patient to medical care. A statement that articulates the rights in which the doctors and hospitals ought to provide patients, thereby providing information, offering fair treatment, and granting them autonomy over medical decisions. There are six values that are commonly applied to medical ethics (Showalter, 2010). The Bill of Rights include: the right to exercise the freedom of speech, to practice religion, be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures, bear arms in an organized militia, demand a jury trial, to be protected against self- incrimination and be accordance substantive and procedural due process of the law. This also applies to June because she has the right to choose her own path in life. In this case, June is suffering from a dangerous disease.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plastic Surgery

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Decisional capacity of the minor and avoidance of coercion are at least two general categories of ethical issues in this controversy that must be confronted by both physicians and patients. First, minors are not generally considered ready to make such decisions either by social convention or law. (Occasional exceptions have been recognized--for example, terminally ill children for whom conventional treatments have failed are sometimes permitted to refuse further burdensome treatment.) Also crucial is the tremendous influence that social pressure from the advertising and entertainment media can have on susceptible young persons. This is not to say that all adolescents lack decisional…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certainly, teenagers are old enough to make decisions about things that concern them. It is at the end of the teenage that a lot of decisions are made. Decisions made include the courses of study they wish to undertake, the career paths they wish to follow, and, perhaps, select the persons that each of them want to have as life companions. These are all important decisions. What usually happens is that parents will want to barge in on all these three decisions and if possible make the decisions for the teenagers. The reason: Parents know better; they have been that way before; they are older; they are wiser and so on. But as often happens, especially in these fast moving times, parents train their children to live in their (the parents ') time rather than in the teenagers ' time. Teenagers should be given the right to make decisions that affect their lives; after all they are the one who are going to live with them.…

    • 681 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays