Preview

Terra Nullius Role In Aboriginal History

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1048 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Terra Nullius Role In Aboriginal History
Terra Nullius is Latin for the Ancient Roman of “land that belongs to no one”. This term is used in International law to describe any area or landmass that is not or has never been subject to the sovereignty of any state. The term Terra Nullius plays an undeniable large role in Australia history, both to the colonizing European and British settles and the native indigenous population.

In 1788 the colonization of Australia commenced. With the arrival of British and European settlers to Australia Terra Nullius was declared. With the declaration of Terra Nullius this meant that every that all native Aborigines to Australia no longer had the right to any land, animals and to a greater extent the very way that government themselves. There are
…show more content…

That meaning in areas such as Brittan or Europe history had been recorded in books and literature for future generations and important information, this was seen as not the case in Australia amongst its Aboriginal population. This can now be seen as fiction as much of Australia Aboriginal history is told and recorded through movement such as dance and the passing down of stories from generation to generation. The same can be said for the argument of representatives and politics. Although it is true that the indigenous population at the time didn’t have a universal legal system such as those found in more western cultures it is clear and evident that the land was divided into different areas, states if you will, and belonged to different clans. Not so different to country’s such as Scotland just a couple of century’s prior. Each tribe had its own laws governing its people, from punishments for crimes committed to interaction and political relations with other …show more content…

But not just the country itself this also included all its natural recourse along with its plants, animals and now essentially its indigenous population. This would in term cause much conflict, debate and arguments both legally and politically in the future. One of the major issues that would eventually arise from this the decision of invoking Terra Nullius would be land rights. With Australia now being owned by the crown of Brittan the Aboriginal natives could fall pray to laws they didn’t even know about in relations to trespassing and hunting that they had never previously encounter. It wasn’t until Eddie Mabo took his case to court in 1981 stating that the Meriam tribe had “cultivated” the earth and there for Terra Nullius should never had been declared as cultivation is a clear sign of inhabitance and ownership of land. The Mabo cause showed that not only did tribes own and cultivate land but areas where also more privately cultivated and owned by families and individuals with clear property boundaries. In regard to the Mabo case the declaration of Terra Nullius was rejected but only so far as to state that the common law had fail to protect the Meriam tribe during the colonization of Australia. This means that the Meriam people were in tern given their land back however the decision of Terra

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mabo Case Study Australia

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The term Mabo refers to all issues relating to the Australian High Court judgement in the Mabo v. Queensland case. On the 3rd of June, 1992, after a decade long lawsuit, the High Court ruled that the land title of the Indigenous Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders is recognised at common law. This Indigenous Peoples land title comes from the continuation within common law of their rights over land which pre dates the European colonisation of Australia. In the absence of an effective extinguishment by the crown, this title presents through heritage the original occupants right to possession of their traditional lands in accordance with their customs. The judgement has, at long last, rejected the "Terra Nullius” bringing Australia in line with remaining common law countries. Eddie Mabo had died of cancer in February 1992 so he was not alive to see the final ruling that would become so historic because it completely overruled the idea of Terra Nullius. Nobody could have predicted the changes it made on Australian land law.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    deem it timely from 1912 on to have aboriginals release the right to which they could lay claim"…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The legal fiction upon which Australia was founded refers to the British doctrine, “terra nullius”. The phrase translates to “land without ownership”. When Australia was founded, even though the colonisers acknowledged the presence of the Indigenous they considered the Aboriginals too primitive to be actual owners. The Aboriginals were considered too primitive with no identifiable hierarchy or political structure. This legal fiction had a significant impact on Australia with the widely known Mabo Case. In May 1982, Eddie Mabo and four other plaintiffs of the Murray Islands pursued confirmation of their traditional land rights in the High Court of Australia. Their claim had been that Murray Island (Mer) had been previously inhabited and had been possessed by the Meriam people with their own social and political organisations. After 10 years and the death of Mabo, on June 3 1992, the High Court ruled that the lands of Australia were not terra nullius when European settlement occurred and the Meriam people were entitled to the lands of Murray Island. Then in December 1993, the Native Title Act was produced as part of the Commonwealth’s response to the High Court’s decision to protect the native lands of Aboriginals. The legal fiction has therefore had a major impact on Australia’s legal history with the introduction of the Native Title Act where the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders were compensated for the dispossession of their lands.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this journal article Mercer, discusses the on-going debate surrounding Indigenous Australians land rights claims from the mid-1980s onwards. He then goes on to discuss that the law surrounding land always adhered to the principles of Governor Bourke’s’ Proclamation, until the landmark decision handed down in the Mabo case. However, he concludes that in regard to political climate little else has been done in the advancement of land rights’ legislation in regard to the Indigenous Australian population. He also provides a comparison between how Australia and Canada have responded to Indigenous claims of land, saying that Canada has acted far…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mabo V State

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mabo and others v State of Queensland (No.2 (1992) HCA 23, is arguably one of the most famous native title claims in Australian history. This case was the first in Australian history to successfully overturn Terra Nullius and essentially led to the creation of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (‘The Act’). Terra nullius means land belonging to no one or land that has never been subject to sovereignty of any state and is a part of International Law. The majority of Indigenous People view terra nullius in a negative way, as this term had been used as a means for justifying invasion or takeovers of traditional land. The result of terra –nullius on ATSI (Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islanders) meant that they have suffered countless wrong doings and injustice towards them.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1788- Arrival of first white settlers in Australia on the assumption that Australia was “terra-nullius” (empty land) -1970s term…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Redfern Jarjum Speech

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1778 captain James Cook discovered Australia claiming ‘Terra Nullius’ meaning land belonging to no one, since then Aboriginal Australians the original inhabitants of the land have struggled for land and social rights as well as the freedom from persecution and the capability to be educated. Redfern Jarjum College has opened its doors to 24 Aboriginal children who were unable to thrive in the mainstream education system with a program specially designed to accommodate their unique cultural needs.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Mabo brought forth a new yet logical approach to land ownership within Australia through utilising the courts of Australia and it is with this that he and others brought forth a case to the high court of Australia. This case did not only affect Mabo’s land as it would affect all of the indigenous people’s right to land as with the passing of the case it would remove the once placed terra nullius on Australia and allow for aboriginals to once more take ownership of their land. This is evident in a news article from the time titled “Court's ruling destroyed idea of terra nullius” where it states, “The High Court found in favour of the Murray Islanders and overturned the doctrine accepted until then that Australia had been terra nullius”. Henceforth, the methods of Eddie Mabo challenged previously set out laws and regulations and compelled the high courts of Australia to modify it so that the aboriginals would have their rightful ownership of their…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Sugar Play Analysis

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An Indigenous person, who legitimately works for payment, gets less as a result than a white person does for literally doing nothing. From this example, it can be inferred that in some cases the Indigenous were used as a resource for the Europeans gain, even at the expense of the Native’s livelihood. Additionally, another example of othering within the 1905 act comes from section 12; “Ministers can dictate where Aboriginals in terms of reserves and boundaries”. Ironically enough, this section is one of the primary forces of conflict driving the play, the gentrification of the Indigenous reserve in order to benefit white authority figures in a political sense. The othering of Indigenous Australian’s predates the 1905 act and is even evident at the very roots of the Australian nation through the establishment of the Australia constitution, section 51, part 26 states; “the people of any race for who it is deemed necessary to make special laws”. Furthermore, it is clear that the marginalisation of the Australian Aborigines came from a systematic, institutionalised sense through the 1905 act, and indirectly through the Australian…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australian history has been tied to British history since its discovery by James cook in 1778, and its colonial occupation, this creates issues of identity for Australians reading their history. To an 18th…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terra Nullius

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Captain Cook first came to the shores of what became known as Australia, he encountered inhabitants of the land … but despite that evidence of occupation he nevertheless proclaimed it ‘terra nullius’, or ‘uninhabited land’. It is ironic, indeed absurd, that such a term could be applied to peoples whose lives were so intimately integrated into and a part of ‘place’. By comparison, the European ‘discoverers’ were transients—wanderers with far fewer ties to their own homelands.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Mabo Decision

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Mabo Decision was the goal to overturn the idea of Terra Nullius so that Aboriginal peoples would be recognised…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terra nullius is a Latin expression deriving from Roman law meaning "nobody's land", which is used in international law to describe territory which has never been subject to the sovereignty of any state, or over which any prior sovereign has expressly or implicitly relinquished sovereignty. Sovereignty over territory which is terra nullius may be acquired through occupation, though in some cases doing so would violate an international law or treaty. (Wiki) Using the expression of Terra Nullius to condone this action Aboriginal people were then forcibly removed off their land. They were uprooted not only from their land but also from resources and control over their lives and movement. Violence and massacres were inflicted on Aboriginal communities. Another way this was done was through the introduction of disease by the Europeans was inflicted upon Indigenous peoples. The next contributing factor is Colonialism which is known as the removal of Aboriginal children from their families, or refers to the imposition of a political, economic and social system onto a sovereign people. Colonialism means to conquer, to dominate, to render submissive. It was the formation of Missions and Reserves. Along with the Denial of Citizenship Rights. There was no acknowledgment in the Australian Constitution. It was in this time that the creation of protection and welfare boards and state Ordinances took place. Colonialism revolved around Cultural, Political and Economic domination. Racism is the final factor associated with the stolen generation. Racism is Discrimination and Exclusion from all sectors of society, such as (education, training, employment,). Non-Aboriginal control of Aboriginal administration and policy. It is based on the notion of cultural and racial superiority. Racism assumes that certain groups are culturally, biologically, genetically, and…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Australian Aborigines were the first people to live on the continent Australia, being here longer than the White Australians. During that time, the Aboriginal people made a special bond with the land and their kinship to their families. After the invasion of the Europeans settlers, laws were introduced to take away the land traditionally owned. Protectionism was one of the first policies meaning that Aborigines and the European settlers were separated and ‘protected’ for their own good. This was failing and that’s when assimilation was introduced which meant…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Captain cook arrived to Australia in 1770 and it was believed that there was at least 750 000 Aborigines living in 600 different tribes in Australia. Aboriginal people formed their own way of living with their isolation of external influences with dreamtime, their religious and spiritual belief. The Aboriginal people believed in terra nullius (meaning 'land belonging to no one') and soon after, the Europeans took away terra nullius and claimed to own the land. The European colonial governments started to grant, lease and sell land to white settlers and made money from it.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics