Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Territorial Expansion

Good Essays
465 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Territorial Expansion
In the period between 1800 and 1850 America experienced a marked change in national unity. Territorial expansion had a large effect on national unity in this period. Territorial Expansion was among the great subject of debates during the period 1800-1855. These debates discuss arguments in favor or non-favor of U.S. Expansion. The arguments express concerns, fears and advantages the nation will experience by the consequences of expansion. Documents A, C, D, H and I are against territorial expansion. Between 1800 and 1823 the Louisiana Purchase and the Treaty of 1818 boosted national unity. First, the Louisiana Purchase boosted unity because it helped spur the Era of Good Feelings and it displayed Western loyalty. The 1803 Louisiana Purchase helped spur the Era of Good Feelings because it marked the beginning of the downfall of the Federalists. The Federalists opposed expansion because they feared that new territories would drain off their New England population and compete with New England economically, which would decrease their potency in America. James Elliot, a federalist from Vermont states in document 'A' that the Constitution does not mention the subject of acquiring new land. The treaty does not state whether or not you can or can't acquire territory, therefore; the treaty is unconstitutional. “It is a great mistake.” John Calhoun states in doc. H. “..Very few, indeed, have had the good fortune of forming a constitution capable of endurance.” He continued. John believes that if the constitution allows people to acquire new land it would be a mistake due to their lack of ability to maintain a stable civilized state, and trust that all people are capable of self-government. The people that are against the expansion on see's it to be trouble and believe we can live without it. Documents B, E, G and J are in favor of territorial expansion. Document 'B' is a map displaying the distribution of votes in the House of Representatives on the declaration of war (June, 4, 1812). It shows that the voters who are against expanding land are mainly up north. The south and west are for it and want to expand and see the British removed from America. Benton was an architect and champion of westward expansion by the United States, a cause that became known asManifest Destiny. In document 'F' Benton favored the settlement of Oregon as he see's it will open trade to the asian trade. He considered unsettled land to be insecure, and tirelessly worked for settlement. His efforts against soft money were mostly to discourage land speculation, and thus encourage settlement. In conclusion, both sides have their reasons as to which they believe. The in-favors believes it hepls them with wealth and evolution and the non-favors say it's a bad idea, and pointless.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    During his presidency, Polk added many acres to the American territory. For instance, the most famous is Texas, which originally had been part of Mexico. A critical review of his controversial actions, as well as the philosophy of Manifest Destiny, attempts to present a review of his presidency, whose leadership led to various changes in the US topography. Thus, the memory of Polk’s…

    • 1271 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the treaty we acquire territory; therefore, the treaty is unconstitutional.” (Doc A) however, ironically, the federalists were known for having a loose interpretation of the constitution, and, instead, Jefferson was the one who had a hard time with the strict interpretation of the constitution on the issue. Other excuses brought up by the federalists against the issue of the Louisiana purchase were the threat that the, now bordering, Spanish now posed against the United States due to the standing army that Spain had, and because it would “destroy with a single operation the whole weight and importance of the eastern states”. Despite the opposition by the federalists, Jefferson was able to pass the Louisiana Purchase in congress, as the benefits of the extreme bargain far outweighed the excuses that the federalists were offering; thus, giving many citizens the hoped of a new beginning in the west and the start of the westward expansion. Although the war of 1812 did not acquire more land for the United States, it helped to clear the way for expansion by removing the British from United States territory, thus clearing the way for American expansion. Not only did the war remove the British but it also led to the demise of the Federalist…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2005 Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ID-2 Assess the impact of Manifest Destiny, territorial expansion, the Civil War, and industrialization on popular beliefs about progress and the national destiny of the U.S. in the 19th century…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Us History Chapter 21

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12. Proponents in favor of overseas expansion by the United States in the latter nineteenth century…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    HIST 117A Syllabus

    • 757 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This course surveys the history of the United States from precolonial times through Reconstruction (1877). C-ID HIST 130 (GC)…

    • 757 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert Morgan Analysis

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Robert Morgan claims that the problems caused by westward expansion were not the fault of a few famous people but of common citizens.The claims of Robert Morgan are reasonable. To support this claim,the three text used will be, “ Thomas Jefferson’s America, 1801” --Stephen Ambrose, “Reporting to the President, September 23- December 31, 1806” (pages 418-21) -- Stephen Ambrose, and “ Chief Joseph Speaks…” --Chief Joseph.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | -Federalists argue that the Constitution does not touch on territorial expansion at all.-The issue therefore, should not be touched onit will just stir the pot unnecessarily-If issue is dealt with, a war (standing army) will undoubtedly come about.-Since treaty is unconstitutional, territorial expansion is unconstitutional.-Acquiring land requires an army because Louisiana territory borders Spain.-If the country continues to grow, the Eastern states will not be important anymore.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The territorial expansion also known as Manifest Destiny in the United States during 1830s to 1860s was an important element for the country. The enlargement or expansion of the US, helped the US become unified through economic, political, and social. Territorial expansion would help the economy because it would become more stable and have more jobs opportunities. Politically, there would be more people to encounter in the West which cold gain more political gain. Also socially because slavery was still an issue and moving west would bring the question if slavery should continue west or not. With economic, political, and social power the US became more united as a whole country.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around the 1840s, the US aspired to annex Texas and incorporate it as a state within the Union. However, gaining Texas had its consequences as it lead a war with Mexico. William Ellery Channing, an abolitionist and pacifist, saw that the policy regarding obtaining Texas would led the “nation into war” as it severed as “encroachment,” and a way “to propagate the curse of slavery.” (Doc 2) The annexation of Texas was seen invading Texas’ link to Mexico as in document one, the American Review stated the annexation “shall dissolve the slight bounds that now link the province to Mexico” (Doc 1) This served as a situation for Mexico, who had refused to recognize Texas’ independence and its takeover by the United States, although President James Polk, a strong supporter of the annexation of Texas as seen in his Inaugural Address- where he stated “none can fail to see the danger to our safety and future peace if Texas remains an independent states,” attempted to aid Mexico in coming to an understanding. Therefore, the Mexican War broke out, out of the effort for Texas to break free its bond to Mexico. Eventually, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the war, and came to an agreement that included setting boundaries for Texas and the acquisition of new territory- California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The North American Republic has already absorbed territories pertaining to Great Britain, France, Spain, and Mexico. It has employed every means to accomplish this - purchase as well as usurpation, skill as well as force, and nothing has restrained it when treating of territorial acquisition. Louisiana, the Floridas, Oregon, and Texas, have successively fallen into its power” (Alcaraz).…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate the extent to which differing ideas of national identity shaped views of United States overseas expansion in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the United States began to prosper domestically and internationally due to America’s second Industrial revolution and their advancement towards becoming a World Power. America’s emergence as a World Power brought about ambitious ideas of imperialism as opportunities for America dwindled within their grasp. The idea of America being associated with imperialistic desires caused conflicting ideas about America’s national identity. America was divided between Republicans and Democrats on the issue of expansion due to questions of founding beliefs, viable opportunities, and the effect on American morale. Republicans were proponents for imperialism and advocated an aggressive approach to foreign affairs, while Democrats were opponents for imperialism and advocated focusing on domestic issues and maintaining the status-quo of tradition identity.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    That whole time, they continued to debate whether the President had the right to make such a purchase. After October of 1803, congress began debating the details on governing the territory. They could not decide whether or not it would be given the same rights as the states, and whether or not the citizens should be allowed to govern themselves. They also debated the exact boundaries of the purchase and whether the purchase was constitutional. Much of the time debating was spent on An Act erecting Louisiana into two Territories and providing for the Temporary Government thereof. The other bill that took a very long time to get through congress was An act giving effect to the laws of the United States within the Territories ceded to the United States by the treaty of the thirtieth of April, one thousand eight hundred and three, between the United States and the French Republic, and for other purposes. Also, Thomas Jefferson himself requested congress to discuss the fact that rich landowners were claiming and monopolizing all the land in the new territitory. One act that actually helped with funding the purchase was passed on March 3, 1804, which said all revenues and taxes from the new territory would be put into the United States Treasury, rather than a separate treasury for the…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many opposed the growth of America and attempted to keep Americans boxed in east of the Mississippi River. Prior to becoming a part of America, the Louisiana Purchase was used as a tool to halt the expansion of the United States of America. Without the insight of Thomas Jefferson, the greed of Napoleon Bonaparte, and a Revolution in Sainte-Domingue the deal may never have happened. Thanks to these events America was able to almost double the amount of land that it owned and paved the way for expansion into the west.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vietnam War

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Carnes, Mark C. and, Garraty, John A. The American Nation A History of the United States. New York: Pearson Education, Inc., 2008.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The south region remained overwhelming rural while in the North the region was transformed into an “integrated economy of commercial farms and manufacturing cities”. The spread of market relation, “the westward movement of population and the rise of vigorous political democracy all reshape the idea of freedom, and identity, evermore closely with economic opportunity, physical mobility and participation in a vibrantly democratic political system.” the market revolution and territorial expansion were “intimately connected with a third central element of American…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics