Preview

Texas and California Annexation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Texas and California Annexation
Texas and California Annexation

John O’Sullivan defined “manifest destiny” and used the term to promote the annexation of Texas and the Oregon Country to the United States. When he said, in a spirit of hostile interference against us, for the avowed object of thwarting our policy and hampering our power, limiting our greatness and checking the fulfillment of our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.... he was describing the painting depicting the different economic activities of the pioneers of that time that highlighted the changing forms of transportation and the belief that the United States was destined to expand from the Atlantic seaboard to the Pacific Ocean. The "Manifest Destiny" eventually became a standard historical term, often used as a synonym for the expansion of the United States across the North American continent.

According to O’Sullivan, Texas was acquired for many reasons one of them being slave labor needing to be “Drained Off” southwardly. It was sort of a pro-slavery measure calculated to increase that institution.

America can offer many things to the unsettled regions, especially California such as the alleviation of servile degradation. Seeing as how Mexico is very dependent on California and if California joins, Mexico will be forced to become independent.
I suppose O’Sullivan would respond the views express in “Tecumseh on White Encroachment” or “Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World” solely on his own personal views and beliefs of what the topics of the two documents discuss. Furthermore, without any previous knowledge of the content of the said documents, it is uncertain how accurate one can foresee what O’ Sullivan would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The historical relationship between the Texas government in the US government is the people of Texas really didn't want to join the United States. When Texas finally joined the United States the U.S didn't respect land agreements and were taking the Texans land. Then Mexico doesn't agree with the deal Santa Ana had made with Texas. The United States offers 20 million for Texas but Mexico denies it, which then causes the Mexican-American war which the US dominates most of Mexico's territory. Then Mexico agrees to the deal and signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo 1846 which sets the US-Mexico border at the Rio Grande River. Mexico was financially compensated for…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after gaining independence, Texas elected Sam Houston as their first president and voted for annexation. Andrew Jackson decided to wait a few years before adding Texas to the United States. Texas, being a slave state would upset the balance of slave states. He also knew that the addition could spark a war with Mexico. The annexation of Texas immediately caused tensions between the Mexican government and the United States. With the desire to acquire California and New Mexico, President James Polk sent troops to disputed territory to further upset the Mexican government. The American troops were quickly attacked, and the Mexican- American War was ignited. General Zachary Taylor led his men to victory at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stephen F. Austin’s father (Moses Austin) was the original person to pursue a settlement in Texas (which was part of Mexico). In 1821, he had been granted a significant amount of land in the territory, but died shortly after. That was when Stephen F. Austin became the one to move forward with the settlement. It originally attracted 297 US families and continued to grow. By 1830, the Mexican government was greatly concerned with the large population of US citizens moving to Texas, so they closed the border. When this happened, Austin took action to convince Mexico’s President to reopen the border, because many Texan settlers still had families in America who wanted to settle there. The President of Mexico listened to him and did as he asked.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1840s, Texan and its supporter were all focused on the Annexation of Texas. The Annexation was a must because Texas was no longer able to be an independent state. Texas need help, and that help was from the United States. The Annexation of Texas was a great thing for everyone because it offered Texas so much resources, but that did not mean it did not cause Texas problems or frustrations.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People think of Manifest Destiny as the official policy of territorial expansion and the idea that God had ‘blessed’ America to become an ocean-bound republic in the 19th century. The truth, however, is that presidents and secretaries of state never really used the phrase ‘manifest destiny’; it was the slogan of the journalist John L. O’Sullivan who created it in 1845 when he was writing editorials about the annexation of Texas and about the boundary dispute with Britain over the Oregon territory. He stated that it was blessed by providence – it was the manifest destiny of the country to become this continental power. It immediately sparked controversy at the time. The phrase itself ended up being used more by critics than supporters as a way…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision in which Texas should become annexed was an ongoing battle in which many people have many different beliefs. Henry Clay a famous speaker of the house believed that we should not annex Texas. One of the reasons was that he believed it would start a war with Mexico. He also believed that it would not help the Union at all. Another man John L. O'Sullivan believed that we should annex Texas. One of his main reasons is that it would add more land, power, and another state to the Union.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On March 2, 1836, Texas had become an independent nation from Mexico. It had named itself the Republic of Texas and proudly stood between a growing United States, and a conflicted Mexico. Immediately facing problems, Texas had many economic failures, had trouble with nearby Indians, and could not form a stable military. It is for these reasons that Sam Houston, a major political figure and President of the Republic of Texas, decided that Texas could not sustain itself as an independent nation. Sam Houston suggested to the United States to annex Texas. This caused a bit of disruption in the United States, as people who opposed Texas annexation and people who wanted Texas annexation clashed. Many people thought…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Almost everyone believed that America should extend from the Atlantic to the Pacific. The two words Manifest Destiny soon became in meaning that those who favored expansion had God on their side. It appealed to both the supporters of slavery, those who wanted Texas annexed, and to antislavery supporters who favored adding California to the Union. The Manifest Destiny claimed that the United States would benefit from trade, commercial advantages, and from lower tariffs. It was a belief that the United States was divinely mandated to expand from coast to coast, the country began to use any means necessary to expand. Among these were unprovoked wars, purchases from other countries, and…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Texas Involvement in Slavery

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages

    One of the most unique situations during the period of the Civil War in America was the involvement of the state of Texas in the Confederacy. Although it was once its own Republic separate from the United States of America through annexation, Texas was not entirely unique when it came to the institution of slavery. Just like in all other southern states, slavery, and the use of slave labor, was a major factor of the states agricultural economy. During the years around and through the Civil War, Texas became a home for many transient southerners in search of sanctuary from the almost enviable furthering of emancipation.…

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 19th century, Manifest Destiny, which is the idea that the United States’ expansion was inevitable and justified throughout the continent, became prevalent and was used a way to validate the nation’s acquirement of new territories. The idea brought forth a sense of nationalism and led to the nation working towards expanding and laying a foundation for an empire. However, as the US made an effort in developing a dominating country, the nation became divided as conflicts regarding the spread of slavery and the beginning of the Mexican war lead to disagreements and a lack of unity.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas being the second largest state in the US holds lots of resources that are more than sufficient for the survival of the people of this state. In comparison to my country Nepal, Texas is 8th to 9th times greater in its size. If a small country like mine, and other example like Singapore can survive by its own, then obviously we can say that Texas secede is a wonderful idea. But each and every fact has its pros and cons like the two sides of the same coin. There are some advantages as well disadvantages of being not part of the US.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas Annexation

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States did not start out as all 50 states united at first. They were all individual territories at first. There were many treaties and wars that led to the different territories being taken over and passed from form ownership to another. Sometimes there were territories that were taken back from previous owners. The United States obtained many territories over the years and Texas was one of the largest territories…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas took many steps toward independence and annexation. This all began with the idea of Manifest Destiny, which was the thought that God wanted white men to take land for their own pleasing. This idea was spread by Mountain Men, who in search for beaver and other furs for trade, probed the Rockies to explore more of the western part of the country. The most famous Mountain Man, Jedediah Smith, crossed the Great Basin and the Sierra Nevada to reach the California trail, which linked the U.S. to the Pacific coast. In 1842 an official government expedition led by John C. Frémont set across the western country, following these trails made by the Mountain Men. Most of nothing was found on this expedition but Frémont’s vivid and romantic accounts of the west drew settlers to the far west. Soon wagons of courageous and hopeful pioneers were making the demanding 2,000 mile and about 5 month journey west. With this great migration to the west American expansionists were seeking new territory. Though Mexico had most of the control of the south and west territories. Many provinces were located throughout the land the American migrants were hoping to settle in. Of all the provinces of Mexico, Texas was most vulnerable to the U.S. expansion. Texas had abundant, fertile land, and lay close to U.S. borders. It had a small population of Hispanics known as Tejanos to protect the province. To further grow and protect Texas, Mexico agreed to allow Americans settle in Texas. In return Americans had to become Mexican citizens, to worship as Roman Catholics, and to accept the Mexican constitution, which banned slavery. Mexico hoped that this would convert the Americans from a potential threat to an economic asset. Led by Stephen F. Austin, Americans began to settle east of San Antonio, in Austin founded and named by Austin. The Americans sought the economic opportunity of good farmland in large amounts, like many other settlers on other frontiers. By 1835, Texas was home to about…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Texas’s annexation was legal and only between the US and Texas. It was also a god given right to expand west and for no foreign nation to interfere with expansion. Also, according to the Monroe Doctrine, “The Western Hemisphere was to be off-limits to future colonization by any foreign power.” That means that no other foreign country can interfere with our nation expanding west. Also, the question if Texas should is going to be a state in the United States is only between the US and Texas. US president, vice-president, representative, and governor of Virginia, John Tyler said, “The question of annexation as belonging exclusively to the U.S. and Texas.” Texas also wants to be a state because Mexico is being unfair in the rights…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although only one in four families had slaves and were mostly in the East, Texans still supported slavery, thinking it was a vital part of a successful Country. It says in the Texas Ordinance "She was received as a commonwealth holding, maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery--the servitude of the African to the white race within her limits--a relation that had existed from the first settlement of her wilderness by the white race, and which her people intended should exist in all future…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays