Preview

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Administrative Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Administrative Theory
STRENGTH 1. It is the most comprehensive administrative management theory
Henri Fayol 's theory is extremely comprehensive as a way to deal with management techniques. It is also the most used because it has been proven to work. It’s being comprehensive as it covers just about anything one might need to do in a management position to ensure success.

WEAKNESSES 1. It is still based on human application
The weaknesses to the theory are that it is still based on humans. As humans we are naturally going to make mistakes. The theory works on the basis of having harmony among people in which unity forms to create a strong management team. However, when mistakes are made it can undermine the entire strength of the team.
Furthermore, if a person is found to be false and will not admit it, more problems can ensue. This is the same weaknesses of any system that relies on humans to be in control given various factors like personality and that mistakes can be made. 2. Reliance on experience Many of the writers in the management developed their ideas on the basis of their experiences as managers or consultants with only certain types of organizations. For instance, Fayol 's work came primarily from his experiences with large manufacturing firms that were experiencing stable environments. It may be unwise to generalize from those situations to others especially to young, high-technology firms of today that are confronted daily with changes in their competitors ' products. 3. Untested assumptions
Many of the assumptions made by classical writers were based not on scientific tests but on value judgments that expressed what they believed to be proper life-styles, moral codes, and attitudes toward success. For instance, the classical approaches seem to view the life of a worker as beginning and ending at the plant door. Their basic assumption is that workers are primarily motivated by money and that they work only for more money. They also assume



References: 1. http://www.vectorstudy.com/management_schools/classical_school.htm 2. http://www.vectorstudy.com/management_gurus/henri_fayol.htm 3. http://www.vectorstudy.com/management_schools/classical_school.htm 4.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fayol vs. Mintzberg

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I intend to investigate both of these men, who are prolific names within management and organisational theory, and have some contrasting views, but also some similarities and development on Fayol’s theories. I will look at the pros and cons of each argument, and the similarities, then explain my view on the more effective management style.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet others believe that Fayol’s elements and principles remain valid and in use today. Luthans et al. (1985) studied 52 managers at varying levels (Mintzberg observed five senior managers). They found that traditional management roles were frequently observed, particularly by successful managers at more senior levels.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fayol theory about management and administration was built on personal observation and experience of what worked well in terms of organization. His aspiration for an "administrative science" sought a consistent set of principles that all organizations must apply in order to run properly. Fayol argued that principles existed which all organizations must follow in order to operate and be administered efficiently. This type of assertion typifies a "one best way" approach to management thinking.…

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Fayol and Mintzberg

    • 2179 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nearly 60 years ago, since Fayol’s ideas (1949) about what managers should do appeared in English version and published as General and Industrial Management, debates about his theories have never stopped. Fayol is incontestable one of the most significant classical organisational and management theorists. Used to be a successful Managing Director in a French mining and metallurgical company, from 1918 to 1925, he summarized his amazing achievements on the basis of his 30 years career and devoted to perfect and disseminate these administrative theories (Fayol, 1949). According to…

    • 2179 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management Reflection

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fayol is also famous for the classical ‘school of management’ in which command and control is emphasized and published in “General and Industrial management” which is still highly referred to a century later. Fayol taught that management was comprised of five major components: Planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rodrigues, C.A. (2001), "Fayol 's 14 principles of management then and now: A framework for managing today 's organizations efficiently", Management Decision Vol.39, Iss.10, pp.880-890.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol also identified 14 general principles of management and organizing, which can be read about in the article: What are Henri Fayol’s 14 Principles of Management? In part, these 14 principles give normative guidance on how managers might master and execute their 5 managerial functions effectively.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rodrigues discusses in some detail how Fayol's principles of management individually are/are not used in modern management. He doesn't necessarily hold a contention or argument as he is ultimately comparing and contrasting the world of management in US organisations from early 1900's to now. However the result of each of his discussions fall in the same favour each time, which may potentially be viewed as a bias and further as a limitation of this journal. A further limitation of this article is that it blurs the line between positive and normative statements, as the statements Rodrigues makes is evidence-based though cannot be tested entirely. This article's involves describing what the principle is initially, then explaining how it is/isn't embraced in modern management before briefly summarising and comparing the current management world to the time when Fayol established these principles in early 1900's; prior to the discussion at the end which summarises the article entirely.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol's theory proposes that management consists of planning, commanding, coordinating, controlling and organizing. He states that power relationships are formed within this structure and led by a reward system offered by management. Attitudes within the organization are guided by how the management uses their authority to dictate the rewards. This is a basic approach use by management, however as the world change and expands on a bigger ground, Henri Fayol’s proposal has become a much of a challenge for the concept is basically base on the top management and that a certain organization’s success depends solely on the performance of the manager. Henri Fayol’s approach is base on a one direction organization which doesn’t take new roads; in my own opinion this approach will gradually be stagnant.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol published a book summarizing his management experience (4 functions & 14 principle of management) planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fayol’s theory falls under the category of administrative management, which is concerned with how an organization should be managed to maximize performance. Fayol’s theory is based on “personal observation and experience” and thus he formulated five primary management principles and fourteen organizational and management guidelines (Jarvis 2004). The principles and guidelines are dissimilar to other management thinkers’ theories, as they are not steps to achieve good employee performance; rather they are to assist in achieving optimal business planning and organization.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This topic paper covers the overview of the life of management theorist, Henri Fayol, the development of his key works, and looks into the environment which influenced Fayol’s development of theories. This paper also gives a review of relevance of his theories in today’s context.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evolution Management

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe the most important theory is the classical approach. My reason for choosing this theory is because I think that all the theories thereafter would not be in existence if it wasn't for the classical approach. Each theory are building blocks from the classical approach since the classical approach has two components, scientific management and administrative management. When these two components are blended it became known as shop management. Shop management is still utilized…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schools of Thought in Management Why knowledge of the evolution of management theories is important to managers • Contributions in management came from intellectuals with widely different backgrounds, so no unified theory of management • So over a period of time, various approaches for managerial analysis have been developed • These approaches are widely known as approaches/patterns/schools of management thought Time Line of Management Thought 3 Classical Management Theory It arose because of the need to increase productivity and efficiency. A theory that focused on finding the “one best way” to perform and manage tasks • Classical Scientific School : Focused on the manufacturing environment • Classical Administrative School : Emphasized the flow of information and how organizations should operate • It developed during the Industrial Revolution when new problems related to the factory system began to appear. Managers were unsure of how to train employees (many of them non-English speaking immigrants) or deal with increased labor dissatisfaction, so they began to test solutions Classical Scientific School 1. Charles Babbage •…

    • 2360 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Authority. The right to give orders and the power to exact obedience and the development of improvements in methods.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics