Preview

The Apology Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Apology Analysis
John Hoogerhyde

In the beginning of this section of Apology of Socrates, the jurors find Socrates guilty by a 281 to 220 vote. Socrates begins his next speech by revealing that he is not grieved by this decision, and that he is surprised only by the ratio of guilty to innocent votes, thinking the majority would have been against him. He tells the audience that the proposed penalty is death, yet he does not feel that is fair in his belief that he had never wronged anyone. He believed that what he was doing was a job given to him by God, and that he was instilling, or attempting to instill, the seeking of wisdom and virtue that he thought led a man to righteousness. Socrates then lists all the possible alternatives for penalty, being a fine, imprisonment, or exile. He follows these alternatives with reasons against these, being that he has no money, does not wish to be the slave to magistrates in prison, and will only continue his practices and be exiled at each new place he travels, in that he will not cease his tongue as it would be a disobedience to God. The jurors then vote to condemn Socrates to death, and he retaliates with the stating that he would never act as they wanted him to in order to receive acquittal, and that he would rather be true to himself and die for it. He further explains that he is convinced that death cannot be evil, for the oracle did oppose him from saying any one thing during his trial, as it normally does when something Socrates is about to make an error or slip in any way. Additionally, death can be of two beneficial things, a state of nothingness and unconsciousness compared to a sound sleep, or the migration of the soul to from this world to another, in which Socrates can question and be amongst the heroes of the Greek history. Socrates finishes by asking the jury for one last favor, being that when Socrates sons grow up, he asks for them to be punished if they ever value riches or anything other than virtue, and pretend

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his essay “from Fighting Words” Richard Wright wrote about words used specifically to incite violence. Wright was interesting to discover what was hiding in this written indictment from H.L Mencken that lot readers in that moment disagree. In relation to Wright words can be used as a powerfully weapon. Wright demonstrated that courage is the main factor for using fighting words.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates looks to the priest to tell him what exactly is pious so that he may educate himself as to why he would be perceived as impious. Found in the Apology, another of Plato's Five Dialogues, Socrates aims to defend his principles to the five hundred and one person jury. Finally, the Crito, an account of Socrates' final discussion with his good friend Crito, Socrates is offered an opportunity to escape the prison and his death sentence. As is known, Socrates rejected the suggestion. It is in the Euthyphro and the Apology that it can be deduced that Socrates is not guilty as charged, he had done nothing wrong and he properly defended himself. However, in the Crito, it is shown that Socrates is guilty only in the interpretation and enforcement of Athens' laws through the court system and its jurors. Socrates' accusations of being blasphemous are also seen as…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    And so as Socrates questions people he makes them aware of their own ignorance and so by providing them with wisdom he is making them more “virtuous”. The reason why Socrates refused the options raised in court is because by exile he wouldn’t be able to teach people and hence wouldn’t be able to make them wiser and so failing his “duty from gods”. In the same sense; Crito suggests, that if Socrates accepts the fact that he will be executed he will be depriving his sons from his wisdom leaving them to their own ignorance, uneducated. Another concept that Socrates aims to teach is that “no one ever does wrong doing consciously”; however, Crito suggests that as Socrates awaits his death he would only be helping his enemies do wrong doing and so “consciously” doing a wrong doing. Based on the previous analysis of Crito’s arguments we come to realize that Socrates might be doing harm by not escaping prison.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that Socrates has made the absolute most just decision with everything he could have done. It still remains remarkable to me that he had turned down such an easy and pleasant life of exile to take on his execution that he is innocent for. Although it seems like such a hard thing to pass on, I know I would have done the exact same thing after some deep thought about how it would impact myself along with the rest of the community. I fully stand behind Socrates’ decision by staying in prison and taking on his…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that these laws has given him birth, have educated him, raised him and have shared the wealth of Athens with him. Socrates thinks that the people of Athens are free to leave if they find the laws unjust, but if they want to stay then they must abide by the laws of Athens. The only thing that he points out are the people in power. He thinks that the people who are in power have changed the original laws for their own benefit. “been wronged, not by the Laws, but by men” (p 54). Socrates accepts death penalty because he wants the laws should be remain in place. Given opportunities such as exile or apology, he argues that if he escape from the prison, it will destroy the laws of the city and, eventually, the city because according to Socrates no city can survive without its laws being enforced. Therefore, Socrates steadfast by his believes of not violating any…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interlocutor Vs Meno

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this dialogue, Socrates is attempting to defense himself at the trial and prove his innocence, while others are trying to put him to death for introducing strange gods and corrupting the youth. Socrates's first sentence sets the tone and direction for the whole dialogue. Socrates, in addressing the men of Athens, states that he almost forgets who he is because of…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous charges against Socrates in the reading of The Apology. The basic charges against him include impiety, corrupting the youth, and theorizing about unknown topics. He does not believe in the gods that the state does, and therefore seeks for natural explanations to processes that occur in the world around him. He did not recognize the gods and introduced other new divinities. Socrates was charged with corrupting the youth. Due to the constant asking of questions and inquiry, it lead him to try to discover new things about life. Since he looked for natural reason, he began to teach others about his understandings. His followers soon began to imitate his methods and expose other people as unwise which was a threat to the order…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates believed that his purpose, as a moral individual, was to achieve true wisdom of virtue and justice. With this considered, one may ask, "Then why did he accept punishment for crimes he didn't commit?" Socrates didn't care for fate, because he was only concerned for whether or not he and others were doing the right thing. This belief is shown to be evident when Socrates says, "You are sadly mistaken, fellow, if you suppose that a man with even a grain of self-respect should reckon up the risks of living or dying, rather than simply consider, whenever he does something, whether his actions are just or unjust, the deeds of a good man or a bad one." (Defence of Socrates, 28a).…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Apology Play Analysis

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Apology, an Artslink Queensland production, is a powerful, realistic play incorporating the issues of bullying experienced in this modern era. It increasingly deals with the effects that physical and verbal abuse can potentially have on the victim both in the present and the future. Within this essay, the review of multiple dramatic skills and styles along with the dramatic elements (relationship, mood and symbol) will be thoroughly discussed, in order to explain if these were manipulated at great lengths during The Apology. This will therefore allow the decision to be formed whether or not this was enough to engage the audience’s attention, revealing whether the message was conveyed; did it impact on them in such a way and was dramatic…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    the apology analysis

    • 1344 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fuelled with intensity, Zeal theatre company's The Apology, fused physical theatre techniques, multiple role-sharing and live music into a visceral and dynamic piece of theatre, professionally and interactively expressing a searingly honest storyline, distinctively relatable to the young target audience. The thought provoking performance was astutely executed by seasoned company performers Sam Forster and Hayden Jones, amplified through the employment of dramatic conventions, creating Zeal theatres desired dramatic effect to create mood, enhance subtext and deliver a thoroughly entertaining, hard-hitting piece of interactive theatre containing a delight balance of comedy and drama.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates lived during a time period where the transition from the height of the Athenian empire to its decline took place. Such a decline took place at the hands of Sparta where Athenians faced defeat in the Peloponnesian war (2006). Thus this was a time period where the Athenians were recovering from the humiliating defeat from Sparta. This was also a time in culture where Greeks believed and thought of gods and goddesses as being associated with protecting particular cities. They believed that Athens was protected by the Greek goddess Athena (2006). These aspects have great significance in shaping up the death of Socrates. Because most of the teachings and beliefs of Socrates went against the belief of Athena and her godly existence, the people of Athens became quite irritated and frustrated with Socrates. The last thing they desired was to have one man in the form of Socrates questioning Athena and subjecting all Athenians to yet another painful punishment at her hands. Thus the entire false accusations were built around this aspect and Socrates was brought to trial. (2006). Even though Socrates had strong valid arguments against the accusers it all fell in deaf ears and the unfortunate, wrong verdict was brought forward declaring that Socrates is guilty and that he was to be sentenced to death by drinking a cup of hemlock. The court stated that Socrates was…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument in the Apology

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main argument in The Apology by famous ancient Greek philosopher Plato is whether, notorious speaker and philosopher Socrates is corrupting the youth by preaching ungodly theories and teaching them unlawful ideas that do harm to individuals and society. In his words Socrates quoted the prosecution's accusation against him: "Socrates is guilty of corrupting the minds of the young, and of believing in supernatural things of his own invention instead of the gods recognized by the state." 1 Further Socrates consistently introduces tediously compiled number of examples to provide valid and sound arguments to prove that he is innocent of the charges brought up against him to the court.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Platos Apology

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though Socrates is proven guilty he has no regrets. He believes he did nothing wrong and is happy to share his knowledge with people. Socrates says, “is not to avoid death but to avoid unrighteousness.”(168-169) In this he is saying he is not upset about dying and he did the right in life. Again he shows this is true when he says, “I would rather die having spoken after my manner, than speak in your manner of life.”(163) He’s saying again he did the right thing and rather die than not have shared his knowledge and be a wise man. Socrates makes it clear he did the right thing in life, at least what he thinks the right thing is. He wants to help people in his life and succeeded in doing so, so he is not afraid of death. He is smart and wise and wants to keep teaching his knowledge. He states this when he says “ You will not easily find another like me, and therefore I advise you to spare me.”(110-111) Socrates makes it clear teaching his believes was obviously not a crime and has no regrets of doing so.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apology Paper

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Apology by Plato, the scene is set up on the jury; Socrates is standing in front of his accusers, Meletus, Lycon and Anytus. He is defending for himself against the four charges brought by the accusers. Socrates is charged with inquiring the heaven and searching things beneath the earth, a Sophist, not believing the god of Athens, and corrupting the youth. Therefore, surrounding him was a group of wealthy young audiences. In the Apology, Socrates is defending for himself as well as prophesies to those who condemned him. Although Socrates died, but he never convicted of his charges; even at the last moment, he warns the condemners and accusers will soon be punished by his son. In my opinion, if I were on the jury, I would also find Socrates as not guilty. Socrates violates none of the four charges, and by his eloquence, he embarrassed his accuser in front of the public, especially the wealthy young group of people and leading the defense on the jury and trap the accuser.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Time For Outrage Analysis

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When 9/11 occurred the world reacted in a split second to the social matter, would our young generation react the same? Today’s younger society is seemed to be less interactive with social matters, than the olden day society. An author by the name of Stephane Hessel states that our young society is not doing anything about our social issues that are rising and we are neglecting the important matters. In, Time for Outrage! his argument is all about: indifference, outrage, unawareness, and non-violent matters that should be taken action towards. Hessel believes that today’s young society is lazy and does not take action towards important matters that make a huge impact on society. Well, that is true our young society must take action towards…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics