Preview

The Argument In David Hume's Copy Principle

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1494 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Argument In David Hume's Copy Principle
In this paper I will do the following: I will explain Hume’s thesis and define the terms that Hume uses, I will discuss the characteristics of the principle that may cause doubt in philosophers, I will analyze the structure that Hume uses for one of his arguments that helps establish his copy principle, and, finally, I will evaluate this argument with adherence to the reasoning, the structure, and possible objections.
Hume’s thesis for his ‘copy principle’ is the following: “all our ideas or more feeble perceptions are copies of our impressions or more lively ones” (EHU section 2 paragraph 5; pp. 77). In order to discuss what Hume means by this, I will first define the words used by Hume. By “impressions” Hume is referring to the perceptions
…show more content…
The missing shade of blue problem is described by Hume as the presentation of every shade of the color blue except one shade that a man has never experienced. Hume states that it is possible for that man to formulate an idea of what that color looks like, without any prior experience of that missing shade. “Now I ask, whether it be possible for him...to supply this deficiency, and raise up to himself the idea of that particular shade, though it had never been conveyed to him by his senses,” is how Hume poses the question (EHU section 2 paragraph 8; pp. 78). However, Hume objects to his own objection by claiming that this example is so rare that it is not worth changing the principle. Hume states, “this instance is so singular, that it is scarcely worth our observing, and does not merit, that for it alone we should alter our general maxim” (EHU section 2 paragraph 8; pp. …show more content…
The reasoning behind it is sufficient in conveying the comparison between the blind man, colors, and experience with color is necessary for ideas of colors and his copy principle that sense experience is necessary for all ideas. Regardless of the missing shade of blue problem, I think that Hume’s reasoning is sufficient because the argument establishes the copy principle as a general law; a law positing a general truth about our thoughts and ideas being copies of our impressions. The fact that there is a singular exception to this principle is at most noteworthy, and is not sufficient enough to refute the widespread truth of the copy principle. The formulation of an idea of one shade of color before a perception of that shade does not speak to the inborn ability to formulate an idea of God or anything else of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hume maintained his criticism of Paley’s analogy of the watch by an analogy of his own. This analogy said that we can conclude that a house had a builder and an architect but we cannot,…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To discuss the argument of Hume on miracles, Mackie says we must first develop definitions of laws and miracles that does not automatically mean that the concept of a miracle is incoherent or is logically impossible the miracle occurs. ~ Mackie notes that if we define a miracle as a violation of a law of nature and set a law to be a pattern of how the world works, then it is impossible that the miracle occurs. These definitions imply that the bill violated the miracle was not really a law, because it is an exception; eZeentis thus not a miracle, because it does not violate any law. But that argument Hume and Mackie said that to dis- cuss Hume's argument we need different definitions of laws and miracles. We need an account of the laws and miracles…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If it were accurate, it would violate the arguments of Hume’s Copy Principle. However, I strongly feel that an individual cannot have a clear idea of a color they have never seen before. If they are given the two closest shades to that particular color, perhaps they could make a guess or prediction as to what the missing shade would be. But, overall, I don’t feel that would be a truly accurate representation of the shade. In agreement with Hume, The Copy Principle is so convincing that this counterexample does not devalue the overall concept that our ideas are copies of other thoughts or…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    16th century German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz is often credited as being the first philosopher to posit the principle known as the Identity of Indiscernibles (Loemker 1969: 308). This principle states that if x has exactly the same properties as y, then x is identical to y. An interesting consequence of this principle arises from the implication that no two objects have all of their properties in common; as such an implication suggests that perfect duplicates cannot exist. Perhaps the most famous opponent of the Identity of Indiscernibles is Max Black, who argued against the truth of this principle in his essay “The Identity of Indiscernibles” by postulating a world in which two exactly similar spheres (perfect duplicates) could exist. In this paper, I shall argue against the Identity of Indiscernibles by defending Black’s claim that perfect duplicates can exist. Our discussion will be focused on the argument below.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been a number of challenges questioning Hume’s sympathy. Some questioned the subjectivity of sympathy, since there should be an objective basis for moral evaluation, and sentiments, being the product of sympathy which is subjective to some extent, is not entirely an objective basis for moral evaluation. Some others challenged Hume with the “virtue in rags” argument, which suggests that sometimes good motives do not bring about pleasure in anyone, but we still approve of such motives, which is inexplicable by Hume’s sympathy. Another challenge is called the weak sympathy problem, which challenges Hume’s sympathy by pointing out that Hume only allows us to sympathize with others at a particular instant, and the object of sympathy is…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussing the principles from which we determine moral good or evil, virtue or vice, Hume argues that because the number of situations we may encounter is 'infinite' it would be absurd to imagine an 'original instinct' or individual principle for each possibility. (T3.1.2.6)1 Instead he suggests that, following the usual maxim of nature producing diversity from limited principles, we should look for more general principles.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume argues future matters of fact are considered knowledge on the basis of cause and effect relationships. He declares that in order to satisfy our knowledge of future matters of fact, it is necessary for us to foremost question how we arrived at the knowledge of cause and effect. Cause and effect relationships are plainly unattainable; we can only make inferences concerning future matters of fact. Hume suggests, “No object ever discovers, by the qualities which appear to the senses, either the causes which produce it or the effects which will arise from it; nor can our reason, unassisted by experience, ever draw any inference concerning real existence and future matters of fact” (Hume, 241). Humans have habit of visualizing one event following another, and declaring the first event causes the second. Hume rejects such an idea, arguing that we cannot declare any inferences taken from past experiences as knowledge of future matters of fact. As Hume addresses the principle of induction, he claims that there is always room for error when making and inductive inference.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intuitionist G.E. Moore whose work is influenced by David Hume argues that it is wrong to derive an ‘ought’ from an ‘is’. Although the…

    • 706 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sympathy, under Hume’s definition, clearly varies in terms of degree with the different connections the objects of sympathy have with us: we are more able to sympathize with a person close to us than with an indifferent stranger, and we sympathize more readily with our compatriot than with a person from another country with a different color of skin, as implied by the principle of association of ideas. Moral evaluations, on contrary, should not vary with the relationships the person, whose character trait is being evaluated, has with us. It is therefore counterintuitive for Hume to have his account of morality based on sympathy, which apparently possesses such a biased character. When two persons, with different relationships with us, share…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his work, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume presents a skeptical solution to the problem of induction and how we draw casual inferences. He conveys that we form inferences, not from reason, but from our experiences of cause and effect derived from the principle of custom or habit.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume and Matters of Fact

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hume denies reason any power because he is an empiricist. Instead three main principles exist that help humans form ideas; they are resemblance (when looking at a picture a person thinks of the object), contiguity (thinking of an object that is close spatially), and cause and effect (association). Hume claims that reason alone cannot establish matters of facts. There is no reason to believe that what happened one time will happen again. For example, there is no reason for Adam to believe that a rock will fall if he drops it unless he experiences it many times. Even with experience one cannot reason a matter of fact to be true, because the universe may not be uniform. There is a chance that because one thing happened many times, it makes it more possible that it will not happen again.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shinnors had come to the conclusion that many other artists (for example, Mainie Jellett) had come to before him, namely, that “the true work of art was creative, not just the precise representation or accurate imitation of an object, figure or scene” as that was not an expression of an authentic apperception (Thiessen 1999, 43). Bacon also stated that the purpose of art was not to ‘illustrate’ life, but to bring it closer to the imaginative and sensory; Bacon believed that “art is a method of opening up areas of feeling rather than merely an illustration of an object... A picture should be a recreation of an event rather than an illustration...” (Walsh 2009, 2). Deleuze (1981, 3) described how one of the inherent problems of representational…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume Skepticism

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    So we see that the past really only tells us about the past. Our real problem is does anything about the past tell us anything about the future? Hume believes that in nature, it does. He says that nature itself is uniform and constant in causing a particular effect and "no instance has ever yet been found of any failure or irregularity in the operation." But when it does fail, it is some secret cause in the particular parts. Since we are accustomed to transferring the past into the future, we feel compelled to make these secrets understandable in order to reconcile nature and mind.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay Utilitarianism written by John Stuart Mill, Mill presents the claim that happiness is the only thing that is good. Meaning that all happiness leads to pleasure through out our lives and can be noticed by the absence of pain. In this essay I will further explain Mill’s view on happiness and how it is connected to the Utilitarianism view. I will then define my own objection of Mill’s arguments and why it is a compelling objection to think about.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays