Preview

The Battle Of Kadesh: The Uneniable Proof Of War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
781 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Battle Of Kadesh: The Uneniable Proof Of War
Is it greed? Or even possibly power? Or even just for the enjoyment? Nobody knows why war has started but we do know that war has been going on since man was born, there is an undeniable proof of war all throughout history. War has been compared to as a chest match, the whit and strategy of one general versus another army to army; some generals chose to just try to outpower their enemies, while others tried to outsmart them. Phillip De Souza in The Ancient World at War writ “Once people have invested in one location, there is something to be both lost and gained through combat.” Jebel Sahaba was a burial site that was discovered in Sudan containing fifty-eight skeletons with almost half of them having stone marks and penetration marks in …show more content…

The battle was fought between Egypt and the Hittites. Kadesh was a city that is now located in modern day Syria, it was often known as one of the most important trade centers during the ancient times. The Hittites were a small nation in Anatolia but eventually grew and around 1530 BC replaced the city-state Babylon. The battle began in 1275 B.C.E. The commander of Egypt was Ramses II who has been known as one of Egypt’s greatest warrior to have ever lived. “Ramses II turned his attention on Palestine and Syria and undertook a series of military incursions that brought him into direct conflict with the Hittites and resulted in the battle at Kadesh.” (Richard A. Gabriel). In this war he showed that he was a very bold and optimistic commander being outnumbered yet still giving the orders to attack and he expected to win. The commander of the Hittites was Muwatallis II he was considered more of a tactician, using ambushes and surprises as his main technique in war rather than straight man to man …show more content…

The Hittites had around 50,000 men. During this war they used spears, bows, swords, as well as shields; but their most important piece of equipment during this war was the chariot. Also like I mentioned above Commander Muwatalllis was a tactician, he started the war off with a sneak attack sending a bunch of soldiers on chariots to quickly take out small groups of the invading Egyptians scouts. And because of this the location of the Hittites became hard to keep track of. There is knowledge of a scout reporting that the Hittites were 200km away but truly they were only 11 km away. Another way that the Hittites got an advantage was that Ramses split up his army and marched them further out (which also increases the distance between the groups) thinking he had time to send reinforcements if needed before battle. The Hittites were of course closer than expected and instantly wiped out groups of soldiers before back up could arrive. Ramses at this point knew that the only way to have a fighting chance was to just try to overpower their enemies, which just so happened to be their strong suite. This was extremely effective because the Hittites thought that Ramses and his army were practically gone and they were looting their camps making them very vulnerable to attacks. The Egyptians

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    An Athenian hoplite carried a heavy 9 foot spear, wore a solid breastplate and carried an almost body-length shield. The Persian infantryman, contrast, wore little more than robes and carried a shorter sword and a wicker or cane shield. Therefore, close-quarter combat favored the Athenians. The Persian disadvantage was exacerbated by the Greek use of the Phalanx formation, an eight hoplite by eight-hoplite square.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of thermopylae was an important battle for both the persian and greek army, the leader of the persian fleet was Xerxes whose army was far more larger than King Leonidas, leader of the Greek army, but Leonidas was a far more tactical and smarter war general than Xerxes.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The biggest challenges they faced was the wind the weather and the talbanian army hiding out they showed diligence by working hard everyday to protect the people. They showed kindness…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12. The Hittites who were the most influential ancient Indo-European migrants into southwest Asia are credited for…

    • 4373 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greek offensive, although contributed to Miltiades as a brilliant strategic decision, is an important historiographical issue for modern historians. Herodotus tells us that opinion among the Athenian commanders was divided with some opposed to attacking with their heavily outnumbered force. Others, especially Miltiades supported an offensive strategy. Miltiades is credited with persuading the war archon Callimachus through a stirring speech to cast his deciding vote in favour of an offensive strategy. Herodotus in his narrative has Miltiades say ‘If we refuse to fight, I have little doubt that the result will be bitter”. However it has also been suggested that the Greek offensive was based on the apparent absence of the Persian cavalry which Herodotus fails to mention. This is puzzling as most modern historians acknowledge that a Persian cavalry force had already disembarked from the fleet onto land and Herodotus said the Persians chose Marathon because it was “the best ground for cavalry to manoeuvre in.”. It has also been assumed that Miltiades deployed the Greek phalanx with strong wings and a weak centre, a strategy that secured…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Meggido

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thebes (now Luxor). Not only is this the first extant, detailed battle description, but it is the…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To a very large extent Themistocles did play the key role in bringing about a Greek victory against the Persians in 480-479BC. His efforts in the pre-war years, his leadership and tactical skills at Artemisium and Salamis, and his persuasive arguments all combined to offer the Greeks hope of victory. However, Themistocles, alone, could not determine the fate of the war. It would be a mistake to suggest that other people and events did not play important roles in the defeat against the Persians as well. To gain a complete understanding of why the Persians were defeated, one needs to look at the roles of the Spartans and Pausanias, the importance of the Battle of Plataea and the mistakes of the Persians themselves. To a reasonably large extent, Themistocles contribution brought about a Greek victory, but not to full extent.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle Of Hamel

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    today I will be talking to you about the battle of Hamel. How it is considered to be Significant and the significance of the role Australians played in it.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though war’s main and only purpose, is to kill for the sake of control and power. While…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On a much more dangerous scale, wars are always started to obtain what another country already has. Many greater nations have all this wealth, yet they have no idea of how it should be handled so it can be a blessing rather than a curse. A major problem is that wealth is advancing but justice and wisdom are moving at a much slower pace. “Wealth useless without virtue and wisdom… Witness those ancient empires of the earth, in height of all their flowing wealth dissolved: but men endued with these have oft attain’d in lowest poverty to highest deeds” (Milton 433-438). As a matter of fact, ancient historians such as Plutarch, Sallust, and Cicero wrote on the fall of the Roman Republic and explained why the wealth had collapsed because of the actions…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The definition of conspiracy is defined by the Cambridge Dictionary as “a secret plan made by two or more people to do something bad, illegal, or against someone’s wishes.” The word conspiracy is often paired with the word theory because people have been conditioned to believe that no conspiracies can be true, they are simply theoretical. But what happens when evidence is suplementary to a theory? A theory can no longer be a theory when there is evidence to back it, it then becomes a possibility.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although all wars are conflicts, not all conflicts are wars. Conflicts don’t always have the involvement of armed hostiles, battles or even the involvement of the military. Conflicts can range from anything as little as an argument between politicians, all the up to an official war. Many people believe since World War 2 there have been less conflicts; however there has simply been less conflicts between nations and more within nations. One of the biggest reasons for this is that 90% of countries are made up of different ethnic groups and cultural groups. Some people do not like different types of people in their country which leads to conflict.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three weeks later, The Second Battle of Gaza had started on April 17, 1917 where the Turks had ameliorate their defences. Dobell fired frontal assaults on Turkish troops. He used up to six or seven tanks, deadly gases and also gas shells. The gases and tanks were a dejected dereliction. After a few days of conflict the attack was cancelled, no land was gained from either sides.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People believe that there is no benefit to war. Others believe that there is benefits to war. War is necessary and beneficial for many reasons, those reasons are; to maintain alliances, to make new allies, and to provide jobs.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Battle of Khe Sanh

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Khe Sanh, a plateau in the northwest corner of South Vietnam, was a U.S. Marine Corps base and airstrip. Located where North Vietnam, South Vietnam, and Laos came together, the Khe Sanh base was important for American forces, as it enabled troops to gather information about the traffic on the Ho Chi Minh Trail. However, the Communists also admired the region around Khe Sanh, since it could act as an avenue into Southern Vietnam. General Westmoreland, who would come to play a major role in the future battles, immediately felt this “crucial importance” (Brush) of Khe Sanh when he first arrived there.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics