This book is about a Jewish girl named Annie. Her life completely changed around 1941. When Hitler had started to do the bad things to the Jewish. She had two sisters, Rachael and Sini. They lived in Winterswijk. They weren’t safe living there, so they moved to the woods. Their mother was sick, so she didn’t want to go to America. She ended up in the hospital. But she died a week before they were taking Jewish people from the hospitals. The Germans wanted more people to go to the concentration camps so they had to hide. Their dad went to a friends hiding place because they only had space for one. Rachael, Sini and Annie were supposed to go to the Hanninks. Rachael did not want to go. Sini had to die her hair to go so they wouldn’t know she was a Jewish. Annie had to cut her hair and dress like a boy to go. When they got to Usselo she met Dini Hannink, they went to her house together. They stayed there for about to two weeks. Then they had to go to the Oostervelds. They were really nice people. Johan was a farmer, Dientje, and Opoe (Johan’s mother). They were supposed to stay there for at least a week because Mr. Hannink thought a German followed him. Annie’s legs were getting crooked and couldn’t walk that much so she had to exercise. She really hated to do that. After a year and a half they haven’t even seen how the house looked. And Sini really wanted a tan. So Johan let them go out. He was going to pick them up around dinner. But then Dientje’s sister came and they couldn’t get in. Annie got real sick that day. A nice doctor came and helped them. The Germans came to inspect their house but Johan made a hiding place in the closet. The Germans caught one of their friends. They knew who had told the Germans so they told Johan to kill him and he did. He went to hide for a while in somewhere else. Then one day Germans come and tell them they want to use their house for headquarters. They tried…
While the theories on the artist intent are of plenty, there is no mistaking that this piece provokes deeper contemplation on the depiction of beauty and the power of “ugly” imagery in this painting. One can argue that over vast time periods and amongst culture the defined interpretation of beauty has seen many profound depictions and interpretations displayed in infinite works of “beautiful” art. We must ask ourselves, can only works of “beauty” be aesthetically pleasing to the eye or can we find it in a variety of work through…
Max Nordau creates an well written and interesting essay asking the question: what makes art appealing? What is considered beautiful, and what is considered heinous?…
In the article First Paper Assignment, Robert Bagley questions the rationality of Professor X’s assignment “just look carefully and describe what you see” (Bagley, 49) for college freshmen. He believes that an artwork is unable to generate meanings by itself, and therefore, the description of an artwork could only be supported by putting it in some sort of context. Such context can be gained by multiple ways, including but not limited to, comparing with similar artworks, analyzing the effect played by different features consciously, thinking of its cultural and historical context, and comparing across culture.…
If someone likes a pair of sneakers and that pair of sneakers is sketched to perfection and hung on a wall, the person will more than likely gravitate towards realizing the intricate stroke patterns of the artist while examining his or her infatuation with the sneaker in a new light. Berger says that “looking” and “seeing” are two extremely different words used “a bit loosely” (Berger 12). Most people often go to museums and galleries and just “look” at paintings of so much worth, value, and meaning instead of “seeing” the bigger picture. Seeing, to Berger, understands the intentions of the artist and some sort of respect. “People who respond immediately and surely to works of art… are often quite as incapable of talking sense about aesthetics”, meaning they concluded “seeing” too quickly, causing them to fail in appreciating the art (Bell 58). Despite their common views on respect towards understanding, Berger viewed everyone’s seeing capabilities as partially influenced by setting unlike Bell, who believes that their appreciation is based off of their personal respect and interest in whatever the object is in the work of art or how they can specifically relate to…
The author suggest that we ask ourselves: “What is the purpose of this work of art (and what is the purpose of art in general)? What does it mean? What is my reaction to the work and why do I feel this way? How do the formal qualities of the work-such as color, its organization, its size and scale-affect my reaction? What do I value in works of art?”…
People often toss around the notion that “art is subjective.” We have heard the phrase “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” one too many times growing up. We all understand that everyone holds different perspectives, but maybe we have become numb to the actual meanings behind these words. We are the ones who succumb to the aesthetics of art without truly understanding the contexts in which it arises from. We seem to think we know all about a culture once we possess or even create a certain “stereotypical” work of art. We get so caught up in the beauty of it all, but we need to question what exactly aesthetic values do in creating a false sense of reality. Writers like Teju Cole understand this urge and give us a wake-up call that we are living…
In this paper, I will discuss the form, content, and subject matter of three different paintings. Each of the paintings represents the following: representational painting, abstract painting, and a portrait. The paintings I have chosen are: Edward Hopper’s Nighthawks 1942, Wassily Kodinsky’s Colour Studies: Squares and Concentrentic Circles 1913, and Pablo Picasso’s Self-Portrait 1907.…
It is important, before looking at the painting, to first understand the purpose and direction modern art usually has. “The entire gamut of modern art can be viewed from the vantage point of the artist’s attitude towards the object, an examination which should throw some light on the larger problem of how the modern artist chooses to interweave art and reality and, ultimately, of what constitutes reality for him (Johnson 11).” A major part of interpreting modern art lies within determining that reality. Viewers search for their own meaning in the painting since the simplicity of most modern works leaves much room for imagination. When the modernism phase of artwork began it was not exactly obvious to the public, but over time there “came about a general awareness that there was such thing as a modern sensibility, and that that sensibility had the key to modern life (Russell 126)”. It was thought that if one was modern they had to easily be able to notice changes of life and be accommodating of “the unconscious and the irrational” side of humans (Russell 126). These aspects will later influence the works of Walt Kuhn in his various oil…
Understanding art forms affects individuals in different ways. Such as, informing individual’s art is in the eye of the beholder. It also depends on the art piece—how the viewer interprets the piece. Art comes in all shapes, sizes, and forms, and no art form should be held above another…
This frame focuses on the personal relationships that both the artists and the audience have with an artwork and with writings about art. It looks at the way the audience will attempt to understand the personal ideas of the artist and the different ways people will respond to the artworks.…
It is often wondered what an artist was thinking or what message they are trying to convey when they create an unusual or even a masterpieces of art. Now it is also safe to say that such beauty and talent might only be in the eye of the beholder, and many will never appreciate or understand the views that others have towards an artists work.…
During traditional times, art towards the viewer was often seen as something objective, but during this zeitgeist art has become relatively subjective.…
Four renowned artists who have explored both the visual and emotional qualities of their art have been Pablo Picasso, Jackson Pollock, Claude Money and Piet Mondrian. In this essay The Frames and The Conceptual Framework will be used to gain a greater insight into their art and explore how the thesis statement is relevant to each of them.…
Art is different from most areas of knowledge primarily in terms of its objective and also the means by which it reflects, transforms and expresses them. For art, like philosophy, reflects the reality in its relationship with man, and represents the latter, his spiritual world, and the relations between the individuals and their interactions with the world. Pablo Picasso was known for representing his work in a non-realistic manner. However, the audience could relate to his works; Guernica is an example of his success, since it represented the tragedies of war, which the audience could sympathize with. Hence, we shall ask if by distorting our perception to reality, how art is a lie and how it brings us nearer to the truth?…