Preview

The Benefits Of The Missouri Compromise

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
421 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Benefits Of The Missouri Compromise
In the year 1820, congress passed a law called the “Missouri Compromise”. This law stated: any state below the border of Missouri that wanted to join the Union would be a slave state, and any state above the Missouri border would be a free state. The law also allowed anyone to cross either side of the border to capture African Americans and sell them back into slavery. When the Missouri Compromise was passed,there were three states above the border that were already slave states, and the law allowed those states to keep slavery. There were several reasons why the Missouri Compromise gave the South an advantage over the North.
The Missouri Compromise allowed the Southern states to leverage slavery for labor and ultimately expand their economy
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise
    • 263 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise

    Give two ordered pairs that are solutions and two ordered pairs that are not solutions.…

    • 263 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    The Missouri Compromise was also important because it was successful, unlike future compromises. The Missouri compromise was successful for a number of reasons, not just because Congress was perfectly willing…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    History Of Civil War Law: The Compromise Of 1820
    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    History Of Civil War Law: The Compromise Of 1820

    In addition, there were some major Civil War laws of the Western Expansion, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an effort to conserve a balance of power between the slaveholding states and free states, by the U.S Senate and the House of Reps. The slaveholding states feared of being outnumbered in the Congressional Representation. They feared because they would lack the power to protect their interest in property and trade. After much debate the law passed the Senate on March 2nd, 1820 and passed the House of Reps on February 26th, 1821.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    LEading up to Civil War, North vs. South
    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    LEading up to Civil War, North vs. South

    One of the major exports of the south is cotton, and while the north invested in factories and railroads, they invested in slaves to tend to their crops. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 stated that all territories about the 36’30 line must enter as free states, and all territories below must enter as slave. They also enter as pairs, one free/one slave, to keep balance. Many inventions, such as the Cotton Gin, led to an increased need for slaves. All the while, the North was moving away from slavery for both moral and economic reasons. Popular Sovereignty allowed citizens of each new territory to vote and decide if their area would be slave or free.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary: The Compromise Of Henry Clay
    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary: The Compromise Of Henry Clay

    The Compromise of 1850 eventually overturned the Missouri Compromise, when Texas applies for statehood after the Mexican-American War. Henry Clay, also known as “The Great Compromiser” allowed Texas to be declared a slave state, by writing this. To balance out the addition of a slave state to…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott The Question Summary
    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott The Question Summary

    As the Missouri Compromise was outdated and didn't set a hold on slavery in the western territories, it ended having slave states argue that land in the west didn’t apply to the…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Of The Missouri Compromise
    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of The Missouri Compromise

    The intent of the Missouri Compromise was to solve the problem of unequal representation between slave and free states in the Union and, hopefully, bring peace between the North and South.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings
    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

    The North predominantly relied on trade and mercantilist profit making, whereas the South depended on labor-intense plantation industries that mostly required use of slavery. As the borderline states became the hotbed of slavery debate, the North and the South attempted to reach consent by Missouri Compromise, which is quintessential evidence that depicts the conflict on the practice of slavery. After Missouri was denied from joining the union because of its headstrong persistence on keeping slavery, the North and the South were able to reach a compromise that first accepted Maine to the union as a free state and then accepting Missouri as a slave state. The compromise not only ended up with a geographical line of 33'30'' that dissected the union but also signified the intensifying sectionalism ((F)). Even if Missouri Compromise was able to bring forth a temporary loosening of tension, it was rather an evanescent remedy of sectionalism that only foreshadowed the worsening conflict between the two parts of the…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Louisiana Purchase
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Louisiana Purchase

    While there had already been tension building between the North and the South, the addition of new territory added new fuel to the fire. If the new states that emerged from the Louisiana Territory were all free, then the balance of power in the U.S. Senate would tilt decisively against slavery or vice versa . From the moment that the expansion of the United States emerged, there was conflict. Eventually after many years of debate the Missouri Compromise came to be in 1820. The Missouri Compromise was devised by Henry Clay . It was an attempt to defuse the tension causes by the addition of the Louisiana Purchase. It gave the pre-slavers the decisive state they needed to hold their position in congress. After much debate was had about which states would be free or slave states with the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, a compromise was worked out. To appease both sides Missouri would be admitted as a slave state and Maine (which used to be apart Massachusetts) would have the status of a free state, and minus Missouri, slavery was to be excluded at a certain latitude . With the Missouri Compromise; all states south of Missouri would be slave states and all states north of it would be free. The addition of Missouri as a slave state just ignited the already hot debate about the legitimacy of slavery. While the Louisiana Purchase would eventually help to…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Role of Compromise in Delaying the Civil War
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Role of Compromise in Delaying the Civil War

    The Missouri Compromise was a good plan in theory. It made one state a slave state and another state free. It alternated between the two to keep it even. The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state, and made Maine a free state. Eventually, they split slave states and free states along the 36-30 parallel, which divided the states into North and South. The North became free states and the South became the slave states. The Missouri Compromise helped keep things neat and even but split the states.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Could The Mexican-American Civil War Been Avoided?
    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Could The Mexican-American Civil War Been Avoided?

    The Missouri Compromise affected the start of the Civil War for different reasons. The major reason was that it divided where slavery was legal or not at a line, known as the 36o30’ line, 36th parallel, or the Mason Dixon line. When Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine entered as a free state. The 36th parallel separated the North from the South, making the North all free states, and the South all slave states. The North and South basically became their own separate countries, but ruled by the same government. Many people wanted to break away from their slave state, and move to a free state, which caused the outbreak of the Civil War.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Missouri Compromise's Role In The Civil War
    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise's Role In The Civil War

    Sectional tension between the slave south and free north arose over the control of the vast western lands, in 1819. During that year, Missouri, the first state entirely west of the Mississippi River and carved from the Louisiana Purchase, wanted admission from the Congress to be recognized as a slave state. The territory contained a sufficient population to become a state, yet the House of Representatives withheld passing Missouri as a state. At the moment, the Tallmadge amendment was passed, declaring that no more slaves could be brought into Missouri. Slaveholding southerners argued aggressively that the sectional balance between states was being threatened. In 1788, the Constitution granted the northern and southern…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Study
    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott Case Study

    The Supreme Court in this case, essentially threw out the Missouri Compromise, which was essentially only legislation keeping the battle between free states and slave states at bay. The Missouri Compromise was the only remaining bandage left covering the wound between the northern and southern states, due to the division of slave ownership. The reason behind labeling the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional is due to the fact that congress has no power to pass any legislature concerning personal property, and by doing so would infringe upon individuals personal rights. However, if all of the above was not enough to frighten the state rights fighters, then the fact that this Supreme Court decision essentially stripped states the right to decide whether or not they wanted to allow or ban slavery would most likely be the cherry on top. Due to the fact that the Missouri Compromise was deemed unconstitutional, the federal government could no longer ban slavery in certain states, therefore allowing for any state to support or ban slavery at will. The problem with this initiative was the fact that there would not be an imbalance in the house and senate due to the unequal influx of free and slave states, which means less state representation.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott's Argumentative Essay
    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dred Scott's Argumentative Essay

    Removal of the Missouri Compromise upset a decision that took place years before the case even appeared before the Supreme Court, when the United States acquired a mass of land west of the Mississippi River from France in 1803 during the Jeffersonian administration. Even though the majority of Americans believed that acquiring land was crucial to securing America’s position on the world stage, the topic of slavery in these states was still a heavily debated subject. During this time the United States had 22 states, 11 of which were free and 11 of which were slave. These states preserved a delicate balance of power in the Senate. In 1817, when Missouri requested admission into the union, this balance was threatened. Congress, in 1819, contemplated legislation that would allow Missouri to construct its own state constitution, which led James Tallmadge, a representative of New York, to add a stipulation that would ban slavery in the new state to the legislation. The amendment passed in the house, which was controlled by northern representatives, but failed to pass in the senate which was equally divided between northern and southern states. The senate adjourned without having resolved the issue. The issue of slavery in the newly acquire land led to heated debates…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics