This was a signifier of the important influence for new techniques of disciplinary technology which lead to surveillance. Foucault wrote a book ‘Discipline and Punish’, where he used Bentham’s design as an argument of knowledge and power. “The panopticon brings together power, control of the body, control of groups and knowledge (The inmate is observed and examined systematically in his cell).” [1]Foucault explains the use of the panopticon, the controller from the middle tower is able to see the individual inmates in their cells. He later in his book goes on to say, “The Panopticon is a marvellous machine which, whatever use one may wish to put it to, produces homogeneous effects of power.”[2, page 202] What he meant by this is, where ever you put the panopticon to use it can be in prison or in schools, the power will act in a certain way within it. Each person who is held within it, are constantly in the watchful eyes of the observer and are kept isolated. The reason why it is marvellous is because the concept is unusual as well as clever, whereby one single person is able to overpower many…
Michael Foucault’s work, a renowned French philosopher, has greatly influenced the study of politics. He began his career as a Marxist and went on to research about sociologically and politically valuable data. In 1961, for his doctoral thesis, Foucault wrote his first major work called the “The History of Madness.” In this book, he gives a historical account of a constitution (as he calls it) of experiences of madness ranging from the 15th to the 19th century in Europe. It involves studying effects of differences in treatments given to mad people so as understand the phenomenon of madness. This book illustrates his thoughts and research on the relations between reason and power, institutions and power and authority and power (Hacking, 2004).…
The idea in Panopticism is to convince society that their actions are monitored by others. Foucault’s point is that “power should be visible and unverifiable.Visible: the inmate will constantly have before his eyes the tall outline of the central tower from which he is spied upon. Unverifiable: the inmate must never know whether he is being looked at at any one moment; but he must be sure that he may always be so” (320). The Panopticon should make people believe they can never verify if someone is watching them, and so they portray themselves as authority wants. While this may contribute to most institutions involving surveillance systems in society, in Nurse Ratched’s ward she is not hidden from the patients. All day long, Nurse Ratched sits behind glass in her nurse’s station, observing the patients: “The Big Nurse looks out through her special glass, always polished till you can’t tell it’s there, and nods at what she sees” (29). The nurse is entirely visible through the glass to patients, and they understand they are being watched by her, and will be given repercussions if they choose to go against her. Further, they specifically know who is watching them. There is no confusion or curiosity as to who is observing; they know Nurse Ratched, understand her personality, and…
Foucault writes of the panopticon, “It is an important mechanism for it automatizes and dis-individualizes power. Power has its principle not so much in a person as in a certain concerted distribution of bodies, surfaces, lights, gazes: in an arrangement whose internal mechanisms produce the relation in which individuals are caught up”(202). Bentham attempts to make the panopticon comparable to a living thing, greater than the individual human, through its all encompassing nature, much like Big Brother in 1984. Foucault’s quote from the Panopticon coincides well with the examination of power in 1984, demonstrating the taciturn power that Big Brother holds over the…
According to Michel Foucault’s “Panopticism”, power has no physical presence. However, once it is inserted into the minds of people, it has a constant impact on the behavior of a society. For…
This idea is based on a drawing of a prison by J. Bentham; the prison is set up in a circular building with isolated cells, while a central tower in the middle houses guards who are able to watch the prisoners’ every move. However, because of the set-up, inmates can never see the guards. This causes a psychological, rather than physical, effect on them. Foucault believes this concept can be applied to modern society, as people are watched by cameras, monitored by the government, and warned by menacing signs. By letting people in society know they are being watched, it can influence their behavior. Therefore, Foucault states that these techniques guarantee control. But, Foucault states that this authority does not have to be a specific figure in society; just the mere idea of “unverifiable” (320) authority gives them power. Foucault creates this theory and applies it to modern day society, and how our heightened control by others is due to this idea of control. While prisons are strongly accustomed to a “Panopticon-like” setting, institutions today such as schools or stores use part of Foucault’s theory—mainly unverifiable figures watching them, keeping society in a democratic-like manner, and to shape society’s behavior so they not like likely to cause…
In a totalitarian country, any ordinary citizen’s powers are limited, if at all possible. Although any individual is treated like a part of the society, he has no chances to play a vital role in it. A person is to follow officially dispersed propaganda and obey the rules, which intend to control everything. The totalitarian system uses any means including manipulation, intimidation and even the worst forms of repression just to achieve the main goal - staying in power. George Orwell’s 1984 and Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest are very similar novels which describe two different societies being mainly focused on individuals opposing the existing systems. In Orwell’s novel, the State of Oceania is ruled by the totalitarian government, with Big Brother as the leader with absolute power. Similarly, in Kesey’s work, the mental hospital is portrayed as a kind of totalitarian society, which is controlled by a “watchful robot” (Kesey 42), Nurse Ratched. The systems represented by Big Brother and Nurse Ratched do not recognize needs of individuals. Those who have power demand total obedience without paying attention to anyone and gradually lead to downfall of those who are under control. In both novels, the efforts of those in charge, ultimately result in suffering and oppression of many individuals, where the effect of leaders, setting and rebellion of individuals directs to a negative impact of one’s psyche. However, at the end, Oceania’s government still stays in power and continues to have control over the citizens, the Mental Institution begings to slowly lose it’s power.…
In Michael Foiucault's "Panopticism" he breaks down our social/economical systems and explains societies mentality on the law system. He answers the "why's" in the way certain individuals act and think as they do. Many times his explanation is very much branched off of J. Bentham's "Panopticon". In one paragraph of "Panopticism", a disciplinary mechanism is described, which is considered the best way for one to be punished, in that new knowledge and learning is gained by every individual. In this paragraph on page 316, Foucault explains how he feels a person should be disciplined and he looks at it from many different angles. "This enclosed, segmented space, observed at every point, in which the individuals are inserted in a fixed place, in which the slightest movements are supervised, in which all events are recorded in which an uninterrupted work of writing links the center and periphery, in which power is exercised without division, according to a continuous hierarchical figure, in which each individual is constantly located, examined, and distributed among the living beings, the sick, and the dead-all this constitutes a compact model of the disciplinary mechanism." In this first sentence of the paragraph a description of how closely watched and evaluated the individuals are. All movements all actions everything would be analyzed. This is how he feels a disciplinary mechanism should be and is a key model for all to follow. In disciplining that way it would make the individual a better person, "excercising power without division" is an example. "The plague is met by order; its function is to sort out every possible confusion: that of the disease, which is transmitted when bodies are mixed together; that of the evil, which is increased when fear and death overcome prohibitions." Disease, definitely…
In other words, they have committed war on the sovereign state, as Foucault likes to claim. As stated, Foucault believes that the sovereign should seek revenge against these violators, but it should be private as to not angry the masses. This is the reason prisons exist, and for the worst violators of the laws, this is the reason supermax prisons exist. Here in solitary isolation even the worst prisoners become docile bodies with discipline. The key to forming these prisoners into “docile bodies” according to Foucault is through cautious supervision and not excessive force. This is the process that is occurring in long term solitary confinement. Each prisoner is being systematically controlled by the prison, until they give into the discipline and they become good citizens. Whether it be the many hours spent alone in a cell, the guards constantly watching them or the strict schedule the prisoners stick to, this process slowly forces them into submission. As Foucault (1995) states, “The body, is required to be docile in its minutest operation”, when speaking on the subject of discipline (p.156). This docile body in the supermax prisons represent the prisoners, who can be more easily improved and transformed through…
Under constant surveillance by a man known as Big Brother, the citizens living in the dystopian society in George Orwell’s 1984 are constantly monitored for betrayal of the government, also known as Thoughtcrime. Through people on the streets and devices known as telescreens, the government watches every movement, every word, every decision a person makes. Surrounding this concept of totalitarianism and Thoughtcrime is the idea that the government often manipulates and constructs the memories of a person, explaining some of the narrative improbabilities in the novel. This also strips the individuality of a person away, simply making them pawns that the government has complete control over in their society. Using this idea, the construction…
Its primary goal was to “generate a symbiotic relationship between the observer and the observed” and would provide those inside with a “clean, well-lighted, and relatively pleasant environment, and the warden with the most efficient means of control through minimal effort.” (Bak 40-41) Physically, the Panopticon is a wheel-like structure with a central tower and connecting cells protruding from its center, making it possible for a single person to monitor the populace. The directive of the structure was to make the authoritative power between inmate and warden irreversible by making “the subject visible and the observer’s presence unverifiable,” similar, in concept, to a two-way mirror. (Bak 41) The prisoner had no means of counter-surveillance while the observer would be able to keep each cell in sight at all times. The concept may seem effective, but only for the observer. In implementing the use of the Panopticon the psychological health of those being observed declined sharply. As a result, “panopticism grew literally from a "house of certainty" into a societal mode of inquiry and inquisition reminiscent of Orwell's Big Brother or Fitzgerald's Doctor T. J. Eckleburg.” (Bak 42) Beginning as a tool of benevolent control, the Panopticon developed into a disciplinary weapon. Whether it is present or merely threatened, surveillance proved to…
“Power can be defined as the possession of control, authority, or influence over others” (“Power”1). It is a term that has been passed down since the beginning of time or humanity that has led to the development of modern society today. Power is not necessarily used in a negative way. It can be used as a way to lead, similar to the president, as well as to set an example for people in the world. Throughout history, power has evolved from being utilized for violence and self-benefit, to the development and betterment of the general masses. In modern society today, it is a massive driving force in determining what is to happen next. This idea of authority is a continuous theme in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. In modern society as well as in…
Michel Foucault’s “Discipline and Punish: The Birth of a Prison” seeks to identify the origins of Discipline systems and the effects of these processes on society. Foucault focuses on the role of power in establishing societal norms, and the consequences that arise when individuals deviate from those norms. Foucault critiques the enlightenment’s effect on society through an examination of the processes for correcting these deviations. Foucault focuses on prison systems primarily, but also extends his analysis to question the processes of hospitals. He opens the door to question how the prison structure of deviation from norms and forms of correction can apply to other societal situations, especially the psychoanalytical studies. Looking…
This study will observe the juvenile participants throughout their adjustment period and examine how well they are able to cope will prison life, how well they interact with others and how they are able to cope once release from prison. This study will be a longitudinal study with a three-year reevaluation period giving the participants enough time to absorb their situation and to see if any changes occurred during those three months. Participants in this study will consist of a sample of 200 juvenile male individuals who are between the ages of 14 to 18 years of age who are to be sentence to an adult prison. All participants will have a choice of participation with full consent from each individual and with parental consent…
Reading the classical dystopian literature of ‘1984’ by George Orwell has led me to the conclusion that it functions as a warning of the dangers of totalitarianism. Orwell projects a negative utopia, or dystopia, of a future totalitarian society through ‘1984’ which uses psychological manipulation, surveillance, and a repressive bureaucracy to exert total power over the individual. After reviewing several critics, it is proven that all of them agree with this statement. Among these critics are Nicole Smith, Dr. Edmond van den Bossche, and Jem Berkes. “Orwell’s novel paints a nightmarish picture of a totalitarian system gone to the absolute extreme, but it is a novel that is fundamentally about psychological control of the public,” states Jem Berkes.…