One side of the story, a young lawyer, argues that the death penalty is more immoral than life in prison. He argues that someone can still enjoy life and find a purpose while being in prison; however, if someone was to receive the death penalty, the ability to find a purpose in life ceases in an instant. In conclusion of “The Bet,” the young lawyer ends up finding meaningful experiences while being in prison for fifteen years. Anton Chekhov does a brilliant job of proving that the young lawyer was correct in the beginning of the story. The death penalty is more immoral than life in prison, because while in prison, the experiences you go through can shape who you are as a person and lets someone develop into someone that they may not have had the chance to be
One side of the story, a young lawyer, argues that the death penalty is more immoral than life in prison. He argues that someone can still enjoy life and find a purpose while being in prison; however, if someone was to receive the death penalty, the ability to find a purpose in life ceases in an instant. In conclusion of “The Bet,” the young lawyer ends up finding meaningful experiences while being in prison for fifteen years. Anton Chekhov does a brilliant job of proving that the young lawyer was correct in the beginning of the story. The death penalty is more immoral than life in prison, because while in prison, the experiences you go through can shape who you are as a person and lets someone develop into someone that they may not have had the chance to be