The Birth Of Spider Man Analysis
Did you know that Spider-Man was created by Stan Lee? The articles “The Birth of Spider-Man” and “Stan Lee and Spider-Man” both explain how Spider-Man was created. While the two articles may seem the same, both have many differences regarding the author’s purpose, the points of views, and the facts appeared.
There are many similarities and differences between the two article’s points of views. Both the authors want the reader to understand that Martin Goodman didn’t deserve credit for the creation of Spider-Man. However, the authors both included different details to support this claim. In the article, “The Birth of Spider-Man” it states, “Lee maintains that Goodman thought Spider-Man was a terrible idea” (Bruno 194). This justifies the identified …show more content…
Both of the articles include the fact that Steve Ditko created the art for the character of Spider-Man. However, one of the articles says that Jack Kirby wanted to make a superhero that appeared like an insect and one did not. In the article, “Stan Lee and Spider-Man” it states, “Lee reassigned the project to Steve Ditko, who used a more subtle and stylized style of drawing” (Patel 193). This justifies the identified answer because it shows that Lee appointed Ditko to draw Spider-Man and this fact appeared in both articles. In the article, “The Birth of Spider-Man” it states, “…artist Jack Kirby also wanted to draw an insect superhero” (Bruno 194). This sentence also validates my claim because this fact only appears in one of the texts, not both. These are some resemblances and diversities between the facts that appear in the articles.
There is no doubt that there were an overwhelming amount of similarities and differences between the two articles, “Stan Lee and Spider-Man” and “The Birth of Spider-Man”! There were similarities between the author’s purpose, the points of view and the facts that appeared. After reading these articles I learned that teamwork is very beneficial because Stan Lee couldn’t have made such a comic blockbuster if it weren’t for his editor, illustrator, etc. It’s true what they say: “Teamwork makes the dream
There are many similarities and differences between the two article’s points of views. Both the authors want the reader to understand that Martin Goodman didn’t deserve credit for the creation of Spider-Man. However, the authors both included different details to support this claim. In the article, “The Birth of Spider-Man” it states, “Lee maintains that Goodman thought Spider-Man was a terrible idea” (Bruno 194). This justifies the identified …show more content…
Both of the articles include the fact that Steve Ditko created the art for the character of Spider-Man. However, one of the articles says that Jack Kirby wanted to make a superhero that appeared like an insect and one did not. In the article, “Stan Lee and Spider-Man” it states, “Lee reassigned the project to Steve Ditko, who used a more subtle and stylized style of drawing” (Patel 193). This justifies the identified answer because it shows that Lee appointed Ditko to draw Spider-Man and this fact appeared in both articles. In the article, “The Birth of Spider-Man” it states, “…artist Jack Kirby also wanted to draw an insect superhero” (Bruno 194). This sentence also validates my claim because this fact only appears in one of the texts, not both. These are some resemblances and diversities between the facts that appear in the articles.
There is no doubt that there were an overwhelming amount of similarities and differences between the two articles, “Stan Lee and Spider-Man” and “The Birth of Spider-Man”! There were similarities between the author’s purpose, the points of view and the facts that appeared. After reading these articles I learned that teamwork is very beneficial because Stan Lee couldn’t have made such a comic blockbuster if it weren’t for his editor, illustrator, etc. It’s true what they say: “Teamwork makes the dream