Abstract:
This study is a psychoanalytic approach to the Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison. The previous research of psychoanalysis to this novel was always by using Freudian psychology. Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis focuses on determinism that human Nature is not flexible. But he doesn’t emphasize much on one’s self-realization and self growth. Freud was pessimistic and believes that neurosis is present in every Human being. But Karen Horney’s theory of neurosis focuses on free will that human Nature is flexible. Everyone has capacity for self growth and all can consciously shape their lives and can achieve self realization. She was optimistic and believes that humanity is relational and instinctual drives do not criticize persons to neurosis. The author chooses Horney’s theory of neurotic human Nature to employ in this thesis. According to Horney, Human Nature and each person is unique and is not destined to basic conflicts. When …show more content…
Pecola believes that people will value her more if she has very blue eyes, and she will be loved. Soon thereafter, Pecola falls into her imagination-her idealized self. Pecola drives herself into conflict by her consuming obsession for blue eyes, the bluest ones. The Bluest Eye is a book made for pity and compassion. The characters in this book deal with such issues mostly readers face everyday in their life and mostly not. While some people can personally understand incest and rape, but on the other hand racism and a cultural standard of beauty is a human anxiety. The people of Lorain, Ohio are cruel, selfish, and horrible to Pecola, and that has unpleasant effects. Ohio people make mistakes in The Bluest Eye. The effects of The Bluest Eye are the ruin of Pecola. Her baby comes too soon and dies. As a result, she loses her