Preview

The Boeing 7e7

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1238 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Boeing 7e7
The Boeing 7E7

WACC Estimation
In order to evaluate the prospective IRRs from the Boeing 7E7, we first try to estimate an appropriate required rate of return for accepting this project. The capital asset pricing model is applied to estimate the cost of equity of the commercial aircraft division:
R_EC= β_EC*(R_M-R_f )+R_f where REC is the cost of equity capital of the commercial aircraft division. βEC is the beta for the commercial division of Boeing. This beta is used instead of the company’s overall beta is because the 7E7 project is a project on the commercial aircraft section. It will help to improve the evaluation process when comparing the WACC with the IRR. Rm is the market rate of return in US and Rf is the risk-free rate.
According to Table 1 shown in the Appendix, the market rate of return for US large stocks between 1926 – 2005 is 12.15%, which is a statistical research done by CRSP. Since 2005 is close to our evaluation period 2003, we try to assume market rate of return equals to 12.15%. The risk-free rate used is the given 30-year Treasury bond yield, which is 4.56%. The long-term rate is used since we are now estimating a project which will have a long-term effect on the business. Thus, equity market risk premium (EMRP) is:
12.15%-4.56%=7.59%
For the beta of the commercial division, we try to derive it with the following formulas: β_U= 〖W_D*β〗_UD+〖W_C*β〗_UC where βU is the unlevered beta of Boeing as a whole company. βUD is the unlevered beta of the defense aircraft division derived from other comparable firms. βUC is the unlevered beta of the commercial division. WD and WC are the weights given to the betas of defense and commercial divisions respectively.
From Table 2, you can see our calculations of βUC. βUD of Boeing defense division is approximated by using the 5-year βU of Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. The reason of using these 2 firms is because of their high revenue contributions from government (93% and 91%). That’s why

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Finance Case

    • 483 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Venture Capital Division of Boeing has four projects on the table with three additional leverages of debt. As the financial analyst for the division I was given the task of evaluating the four capital budgeting projects. After evaluating each project I will recommend which project will bring the most value to shareholders and the firm.…

    • 483 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ProblemSet10 solutions v1

    • 1689 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The dividend is expected to grow at 5% annually. BP’s beta is 0.87. The risk-free rate…

    • 1689 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ameritrade Case Write-Up

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even though the project will invest in advertising and technology, but these investments will bolster Ameritrade’s position in the deep-discount brokerage market and from this market the company will generate all its revenues. And thus we should not use an internet firm as a comparable twin for beta calculation. Ameritrade wants to be a leader in deep-discount brokerage. Other firms in similar business with are Charles Schwab, E*Trade, Quick & Reilly and Waterhouse Investors. Charles Schwab, E*Trade and Quick & Reilly have very low debt to value ratio and majority of their revenue is coming from brokerage. Also Charles Schwab and E*Trade have…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    515 Week 3 Hw

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6. Booher Book Stores has a beta of 0.8. The yield on a 3-month T-bill is 4% and the yield on a 10-year T-bond is 6%. The market risk premium is 5.5%, but the stock market return in the previous years was 15%. What is the estimated cost of common equity using the CAPM?…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We also used the Ibbotson estimate for market premiums based on data from 1926-2009. Specifically, we decided that over the long run, geometric mean is more reflective of true risk premiums than arithmetic mean (since arithmetic mean fails to incorporate year-over-year returns, thus producing an overly optimistic result). According to Ibbotson, the geometric mean for returns for large-company stocks was 9.6%. The market premium is therefore 9.6%-4.6% = 5%.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Telus: the Cost of Capital

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In calculating the cost of equity, we will use the average between the dividend growth model and the CAPM. Since R-squared = 0.13 we know that the correlation is not strong enough and the sole use of the beta given to us will prove unreliable. For this reason, we choose to take the average between the dividend growth model and the CAPM model if possible. Also, as described above, we decide not to count the underwriter fees in our calculation.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boeing

    • 1302 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Boeing Australia Limited (BAL) is relatively new company and a global extension of the US firm, the Boeing Company. The BAL developed capabilities in the areas of space and communication, site management and the upgrade and maintenance of military aircraft and equipment. As BAL grew, it had developed various systems to support the procurement operations at four key divisions and 12 sites that made up the organization. However there is no interface of these systems and they operated autonomously, resulting in a lot of administrative redundancies, low productivity, and high processing time for the procurement processes.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Per calculation, Torrington’s stand-alone valuation is 192.789 million dollars (see Exhibit X), with the assumption that NWC equals 13.5% of sales. All of the numbers in this Exhibit are from the attachments of Timken case. EBIT, capital expenditure, net sales, and depreciation expense are from Exhibit 5 of the Timken case. Tax rate is calculated based on Timken Corporate Income Statements from Exhibit 1 of the Timken case. For the WACC calculation, cost of equity is calculated the assumption of a risk premium of 6.5%, since the market premium decreased over time from 7.1% to 4.7% and it is reasonable to assume that the market premium would be close to 6% by 2002. Risk free rate and cost of debt is from Exhibit 9 of the Timken case. With the assumption that Torrington and Timken are similar to each other, beta is drawn from Exhibit 8 of the Timken case. Then, the weights of equity and debt are…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ust Case Study

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Using the WACC method, we first derived UST’s return on assets (rA). Since we are given the firm’s market capitalization, debt and cash, we calculated the current Enterprive Value of UST. We were then able to derive the return on asset as a function of UST’s market value. Specifically, we followed the below steps:…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boeing 707

    • 2133 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In 2004, Boeing was one of the United States' largest manufacturers, with nearly 160,000 employees and a net income of$I.87 billion. It was the world's largest acrospace company, and, for decades, had dominated the world's commercial Copyright © 2006 President and Fellows of Harvard College. Harvard Business School Case 807-011. Professors Lynda M. Applegate and Joseph S. Valacich (Washington State University) and Research Associates Mara E. Vatz and Christoph Schneider prepared this case as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate effective or ineffective management.…

    • 2133 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cost of equity 1. Formula Risk Free Rate + (Market Premium x Overall Company Beta)…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spyder Sports Case

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1.a) To value Spyder Active Sports Inc., we decided to use the WACC method since we can easily value its cost of assets with the data immediately available to us in the case. We first unlevered the beta’s of 7 comparable companies and took the average to get a comparable unlevered beta for Spyder (Exhibit 1). Since we are assuming Spyder is entirely equity financed, its unlevered asset beta is equal to the beta of its assets. We now have a rough estimate of Spyder’s asset beta, we can use CAPM to calculate the cost of assets of the firm (Exhibit 2). With an appropriate discount rate, we can use the WACC method to discount the company’s projected cash flows. Again, since the company is entirely comprised of equity, the cost of assets is the cost of the entire firm, so we will use it in place of WACC. Using Spyder’s pro-forma income statement, we then calculate the FCF’s for the next 4 years and discount those using our cost of assets (Exhibit 3).…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Aswath Damodaran equity risk premium in the US in 1979 was 6.45%, thus…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcdonalds Stock Essay

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    7. The 2011 U.S. Equity Risk Premiums from Academia and Practitioners (MRP, 2011); Retrieved from CXO Advisory Group website…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Star Appliances B

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In addition to the estimation of the cost of equity, Star Appliance Company is also considering increasing their current debt ratio of 9.5% to the industry average of 19%. With a higher current debt ratio the WACC will be lower, at a rate of 8.24%. The cost of equity of each product was valued using the beta from the industry averages. The beta of the home appliance industry is 0.95, while the beta of the agricultural machinery industry is 0.88. Through the use of the CAPM model, these betas yield a cost of equity for the home appliances of 11.29% and for the agricultural machinery of 10.7%. The WACC of each individual project is then compared to the project’s IRR. The WACC of the home appliance project was found to be 10.4% and the WACC of the agricultural machinery project was calculated as 9.92%, while the IRR’s of the appliance and agricultural machinery projects were 11.29% and 10.7%, respectively. Therefore, both projects should be accepted based on the notion that the internal rate of return of each project is greater than the weighted average cost of capital.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays