Preview

the Boston massacre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
486 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
the Boston massacre
The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770 between a “patriot” mob, throwing snowballs, stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. British troops in the city of Boston were not welcome. It was the culmination of tensions in the American colonies that had been expanding since Royal troops appeared in Massachusetts in October, to enforce a heavy tax burden imposed by the Townshend Acts. British Captain Thomas Preston, the commanding officer at the Customs House, to join the guard outside the building. The colonists responded by throwing snowballs and other objects at the British. This spiraled into a cluster of angry people fighting for what they believed, and not backing down, leading to what we know as the Boston Massacre.
Many witnesses acclaim that the British were to blame, but behind all of the soldiers stood a mastermind. Captain Thomas Preston. One of the many witnesses, including Daniel Calef stated that Captain Preston ordered his men to fire. “I turned about and looked and heard the officer who stood on the right in a line with the Soldiers give the word fire twice. I looked the Officer in the face when he gave the word and saw his mouth.” (Doc L). In the deposition of Robert Goodard, he claimed he heard

Captain Preston curse his men for not firing when ordered. “A Sailor or Townsman struck the Captain. He thereupon said damn your bloods fire think I'll be treated in this manner.” (Doc K).
Captain Thomas Preston was the British Redcoat who told his fellow Redcoats to fire. Without Capt. Preston’s “advice” on firing first, the massacre most likely could have been avoided. Captain Preston claimed he ordered his men to load their weapons. Meaning if there was a instance where he felt threatened he would fire on people with snowballs. (Doc C). Behind the red coats wad the heart and soul of it. Captain Thomas Preston. Captain hid behind his fellow Redcoats in order to cover himself, to insure he would leave

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the evidence was he was that, “there was no random discharge of firearms, the officer gave the orders. “ (Simon Winship) Simon describes how the Commander officer tells his men,”Halt, load and prime.” After that…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonel Campbell’s men were the first to charge up the hill and engage the Rangers (Alderman 36). The mountain was rough, but still they took charge. Campbell’s shouted appeal was, “Boys remember your liberty, come on, do it my brave fellows, another gun, another gun will do it.” When Shelby’s men approached the bottom of the hill, he yelled, “Now boys, quickly reload your rifles and let’s advance upon them and give them another hell of a fire.” More and more troops continued to take down the British. “The human slaughter was tremendous. The dead and wounded covered the mountain on the slopes and on the flat” (Alderman 38). Ferguson soon realized that he had pretty much lost, but he did not surrender yet. He broke his way through enemy lines; slashing his sword at whoever was in his way. Ferguson and two fellow officers were shot down by the creek. “Most historians have credited Robert Young with the deed. Regardless, the bullet that felled Ferguson soon brought the battle to an end” (Alderman 38). Captain Abraham De Peyster took charge of the British force after Ferguson died. Captain De Peyster continued to fight on, but he hopelessly realized there was not much more he and his troops could do, so he surrendered. A near tragedy occurred soon after the British surrendered. Tories, followers of King George III, grabbed their guns and fired at the patriots. The aftermath was very confusing…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The details regarding what followed have always been the source of debate, but that evening, a group of Bostonians approached a guard in front of the customs house and started taunting him. The situation quickly escalated. When a contingent of British redcoats came to the defense of their fellow soldier, more angry Bostonians joined the fracas, throwing snowballs and other items at the troops.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From this excerpt, we can see how Britain didn’t mean to make a “massacre”. A crowd of Boston boys and men surrounded a number of British soldiers and began taunting and cursing them while pelting them with snowballs. This was the reason of the Boston “massacre”.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “STAND YOUR GROUND. DON’T FIRE UNLESS FIRED UPON. BUT IF THEY MEAN TO HAVE A WAR, LET IT BEGIN HERE!”…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Richard Palmes, he asked the Captain if he intended to fire to which he replied "by no means" (Wheeler and Becker, 86). Another witness, William Wyatt, who was also very close to the disturbance, alleged that the mob was yelling fire and Captain Preston did reprimand his men for firing without his orders (Wheeler and Becker, 83). James Woodall confirmed that a stick causing the soldier to instantaneously fire struck a soldier. He ascertained that the Captain did not give the order to fire (Wheeler and Becker, 88). Consistent with all the testimonies, Edward Hill observed the Captain ordering one of his soldiers to put away his gun stating that he "have done mischief enough" (Wheeler and Becker,…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Defend your actions. Critical thinking 2 In the years leading up to the American Revolution, the British sought to establish firm control over their American Colonies. The Boston Massacre also known as “Incident on king street “occurred on march 5, 1770.On evening of the march 5, a lone British sentry guarded the entrance to the Boston Customs house where officials collected import duties for the king .The sentry got into an argument with a barber’s apprentice and swung his musket at him , hitting the boy on the head .Other…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bunker Hill Research Paper

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages

    During the first attempt at taking the hill, the British would stop to open fire twice from their lines. The american’s did not open fire back, instead they waited until they were no more than 30 yards away before firing. The first american gunfire was from Stark's position, where in only moments, every one of Howe’s officers were either killed or wounded. The british were forced to retreat after three successful attacks of musket fire (Dupuy 23). The rebels holding off their fire till the British were extremely close is because Prescott was presumed to have given his famous order of “Don’t shoot until you see the Whites of their eyes.” (The Battle of Bunker Hill.); with low supplies and better aiming chances most likely being the reason for the phrase (The Battle of Bunker Hill.). With the first attack failing, they rallied the men for a second charge. The second time had artillery, which was not used the first time due to incorrect supplies, now being used. The second charge did not go any better, with a result of 40 percent loss of the assaulting units ,resulting again in retreat. American fire was placed on the British again as a third attempt was carried out with heavy losses, with the British fighting through the hailstorm of bullets with bayonets fixed (Dupuy 23-25). People standing on rooftops from Boston watches as the British…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The colonists were throwing snowballs, sticks, and even stones at the soldiers. Furious the soldiers fired into the group of people, at that piont 3 people were killed and 8 people were badly injured. So, Captain Thomas Preston was taken on a trail there, John Adams and Josiah Quincey defend Captain Preston…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lexington Concord

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What does Lieutenant Gould testify as to who fired first at Lexington?he didn't know for sure.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Patrick Henry Dbq

    • 2948 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The Townshend customs commissioners there had been at risk as targets of public anger, but this anger now transferred itself onto the at times high-handed Redcoats, who were seen as the military arm of British encroachment. On March 5th, 1770, the Boston Massacre, the culmination of a series of clashes, saw eight British soldiers, pelted with ice and stones, open fire and kill five Bostonians. Though Parliament was subsequently quiet for 3 years, the mood in the American towns had changed to one of tension and imminent confrontation, and this soon spread to the countryside.…

    • 2948 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The soldiers scrambled to their places, eager to win the battle.The soldiers sloppily poured in the gunpowder in their guns, loaded them, and began to shoot at the barracks of the Hessians. BANG! Bodies were thrown to the ground, surrounded by blood, one of which was Col. Johann Rall of the Hessians. The Hessians tried to fight back, but failed to. In the end, it was the underdog Patriots who won.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there were many important topics covered throughout Chapter 7, I thought the most important was the Boston Massacre, and it has left a long lasting impression on history in America. On March 5, 1770, the redcoats began to be tormented by about sixty towns-people. Outnumbering a group of redcoats six to one, they threw snowballs, sticks, and stones at them, angry that an eleven-year-old boy had been shot during a protest ten days later. As a result to the towns-people's protest, the troops had to open fire, hurting or killing eleven people. The Boston Massacre caused many more fights and protests to break out around Boston, and the urge to be free from British rule.…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770 a specific event took place that had impacted many lives. This event is known as the Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre was considered to be a street fight that took place when a mob started to throw snowballs, stones and sticks at a squad of British soldiers. In the end, five colonists resulted in death. This was caused by the developing tensions in the American colonies that had been growing ever since the Royal troops had first appeared. I believe that the Boston Massacre was an act of self-defense. I say this because, the British soldiers’ lives were under threat and had to use equal force. In addition, a massacre is when many are killed and it consists of an innocent/defenseless side. In the Boston Massacre, both sides were not defenseless. This was not murder either because, this event was not planned or was meant to happen. The British soldiers weren’t intending to kill these colonists. Lastly, manslaughter wouldn’t be reasonable because, the British soldiers killed these colonists in act of defense/protection.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the trigger and set Captain Beatty on fire. "There was a hiss like a great…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays